Cayman Islands: Now That It Is On The "White List," Will The Cayman Islands Remain A Key Player In Investment Funds? Probably So!

Last Updated: 29 September 2009
Article by Sophia Harris

There has been a great deal of attention focused on the Cayman Islands these past few months, more so than usual. Much of the debate as to what to do about the so called "tax havens" has ranged from the White House, the G8, the G20 to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD"). For those of us who work in the Cayman Islands financial industry, the debate seems to centre around the generally successful and meaningful role of the Islands in the global financial industry over the years, in the face of the steadily declining economic health of some of the onshore jurisdictions. Whilst we can look to the increasing tax burdens and unwieldy government systems as contributors to the ill health of most onshore jurisdictions, perhaps it is fair to say, however, that the current and sudden global economic crisis was spawned by perpetuating a culture of debt that became the catalyst for the failure of the US economy. That in turn had unprecedented and devastating global ramifications that brought just about everyone to their knees.

Whilst the unprecedented global economic crisis has generated what appears to be the "perfect storm" for the offshore financial centres, it is unfortunate that, perhaps for political reasons, no distinction seems to be made for those well regulated offshore jurisdictions. Perhaps what is even more indicative of a political bias is that there has been little said to address the real identified factors behind the crisis. As a result, the Cayman Islands Government was forced to feverishly fight being 'Grey-listed' by the OECD. Cayman however, on the signing of its twelfth Tax Information Exchange Agreement with New Zealand this month was placed on the 'White List'.

As an offshore pioneer, Cayman can argue that it has secured itself as the jurisdiction of choice primarily through the crafting of visionary laws and regulations and has become a meaningful contributor and player to global industry by also ensuring that those laws and regulations evolved as necessary and remain well honed. Cayman has also played by the rules and ensured that the business that does go through its jurisdiction meets the international anti-money laundering requirements, and in this respect, it has exceeded the standards of most onshore jurisdictions. A strong private sector which includes buoyant associations such as the Bankers Association, the Directors Association, the Company Managers Association, the Law Society, the Cayman Islands Financial Services Association, the Society of Professional Accountants and the Alternative Investment Managers Association, has worked with the Cayman Governments of the day to ensure that the Cayman financial industry, particularly the banking and investment funds industry, remains at the pinnacle of the global industry.

The current efforts of the EU and the US, against the so called "tax havens" and businesses established offshore, particularly those that are well run and well regulated offshore jurisdictions, seem to require thwarting capitalism and fair market trade in the private sector, especially onshore. The level of backlash to the draft EU Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers ("Directive") designed to further regulate alternative investments, should have been perhaps therefore anticipated, as the Directive definitely seems to run contrary to capitalism and fair market trade, attributes of most democratic societies. A bemused observer made the comment that he was unable to understand why the G20 finance ministers who met in March 2009 had focused on the hedge fund industry in particular, notwithstanding that there was no indication that the hedge fund industry played any part in the current global economic woes (Bernie Madoff aside, (although, in any event, he was not a hedge fund manager) and in that instance the failure of the SEC to do their job as a regulatory body seems well established). Since then, the EU Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Charlie McCreevy, has admitted that most commentators agree that alternative investments were not the primary cause of the crisis but stated publicly that there has been "strong political pressure" for more regulation. Such a confession should be of concern to all in the global market. The Financial News1 has reported that some of Europe's leading institutional investors have said they will oppose the draft Directive, hedge fund managers and private equity firms have formed steering groups to focus their calls for change to the draft Directive and City minister, Lord Myners, has urged investors to join the protest. The editorial of the Financial News points out the obvious: it is unfair to single out the hedge funds as they are, as a general rule "one of the victims of the crisis, not one of the culprits".

The Directive is viewed as imposing yet another burden that fund managers do not welcome. At the forefront of the battle against the Directive, is the Alternative Investment Management Association ('AIMA'), whose membership is certain to be the most immediately and heavily impacted. AIMA has launched a major campaign against the Directive which they have warned could potentially have devastating consequences, including to Europe's pension fund industry which they warn could lose up to €25 billion a year if implemented in its current form!2 Their efforts have not been in vain as a broad alliance has evolved right across the global industry, from the global banks to the UK commercial real estate industry. Ironically it is reported that the US are quietly petitioning against the Directive.

The International Fund Investment's research department3 interviewed UK based alternative fund managers and their consultants earlier this summer, as well as institutional investors and family offices to get their views on domiciliation on the heels of the Directive and the recent income tax increases. Ultimately, when asked if they will relocate their funds as a result of the Directive, most interviewed indicated that it is the rules, resources, reputation and regulatory infrastructure that are the critical factors in domicile satisfaction – not so much that they are in the EU. Cayman currently hosts 80% of the world's hedge funds. The fact that the Cayman Islands has as strong an infrastructure to support the investment fund industry as most onshore jurisdictions, has kept the Cayman Islands at the pinnacle of success in the hedge fund industry to date. It might prove to be a critical factor to enable it to weather the storm. When asked to rate the service they receive from their offshore service providers, the report showed that auditors came top, lawyers came second and administrators came last. The fact that the Cayman Islands continues to host almost all of the top accounting firms and more leading law firms than most of its competitor offshore jurisdictions, allows Cayman to continue to be favourably viewed for domiciliation of funds.

Whilst the research was geared mostly to investment managers and their own domiciliation, the statistics and overall information that the report generated was quite enlightening. Some 84% view the current draft Directive as negative to the industry and managers and advisers alike were "unremittingly hostile". The prediction by most in the industry particularly in the UK is that, if the Directive goes through anywhere near its current form, the migration out of the UK and out of the EU will be almost certain. The Financial News quoted Lindsay Tomlinson, the incoming chairman of the National Association of Pension Funds and European vice-chairman of asset manager Barclays Global Investors, as commenting on the Directive "if implemented as drafted, would have many consequences that in aggregate do not seem to benefit investors. The problem in amending this draft is to decide where to start." Only 22% of managers ruled out leaving the UK if the Directive is not substantially amended. But whilst many are predicted to launch new funds in the EU moving forward, most managers will, it is predicted, keep their current offshore fund structures. The EU Funds will be additional and will mirror the offshore structures. The fund managers have made the point that EU based funds will be 'expensive and time consuming' and most predict the failure of the draft Directive. If it goes through, regardless of its objective, it seems clear that it will deal a lethal blow to the European fund managers and the industry. Any relocation of the funds themselves to Europe as a result of the draft Directive is not one that most are willing to make. Most who have worked in the industry believe the move will mean being forced to work in a jurisdiction that is less user friendly, with less efficiency, less flexibility and more set up costs and overall expenses than setting up in the Cayman Islands which is known for striking the right balance with effective and appropriate legislation. This includes the more likely jurisdictions such as Ireland and Luxembourg that they will consider if they are forced to relocate. They see themselves as being forced into a system that is bound for failure, which is a high price tag that the industry, including the investors, cannot afford. In fact a significant majority show that they will continue to use offshore funds for all of the aforementioned reasons in spite of having to take into account the potential threats and penalties levied at the industry. Perhaps, rightfully, they do not see the blame for the current economic woes and the Madoff type sagas as resting with the offshore industry. NO ONE interviewed was looking to relocate their funds voluntarily and most said they would not, even if they were required to relocate themselves to another jurisdiction. But even Ireland, one of the jurisdictions expected to gain in the hedge fund re-domiciliation of hedge fund managers if the draft Directive goes through in its current form, is protesting the Directive because of the negative impact it will have on the Irish Pension schemes and their investments.

Ultimately, all agree it is too soon to know how things will look once the dust has settled. In the meantime, much will depend on proactive measures to ensure that the Cayman Islands remains a key player in the industry. At a Chamber of Commerce luncheon held in July, the Leader of Government Business for the Cayman Islands, the Honourable McKeeva Bush, announced that the Cayman Islands Government was "...seeking legislative support to encourage fund managers to physically set up operations in Cayman." Mr. Bush continued, "To this end, I will shortly announce a working group to produce a comprehensive strategy for attracting these fund managers here. I also intend setting up a similar group to encourage international businesses to establish a physical presence locally." This is heartening and encouraging news as it shows a willingness to continue to evolve to meet the market conditions, although this also seems to require a paradigm shift in local policies including Cayman's Immigration laws and policies.

It is imperative that other key stakeholders in the global industry also speak up and underscore the importance of the role that the well regulated low-tax jurisdictions, such as the Cayman Islands, play for the continued welfare of the industry as a whole. The Institute of Directors' bold statements of warning to the UK Government and its criticism of the G20 nations of the continued attacks on low tax jurisdictions as without basis and "may not be the most productive [choices]", are welcomed. Richard Baron, the Head of Taxation at the Institute of Directors commented, "There are some bad jurisdictions, which facilitate tax evasion or worse crimes. But we must also recognize that low-tax jurisdictions can oil the wheels of commerce. It is perfectly reasonable for other states to act to protect their tax revenues, but they must be careful not to throw grit into the mechanism." An article published on, written by Jason Sharmon4, author of "Behind the Corporate Veil: A Participant Study of Financial Anonymity and Crime" detailed a study to determine which countries were more rigorous or lax in applying international rules of due diligence for corporate vehicles as well as opening of bank accounts. The study brought home what those of us who work in the industry in Cayman have long known: "On average the US and the UK have a worse record of compliance than the offshore financial centres... Corporate service providers in jurisdictions like... [the] Cayman Islands... were punctilious in their customer due diligence."

Mr. Sharmon summarises the political nature of the assessment made by the OECD and G20 in stating, "the G20 and OECD have fixated on the problem of willingness to exchange financial information between countries. This ignores the prior issue that unless countries enforce the obligation to collect information on those entering the financial system, there will simply be no information to exchange. It is hardly credible to say that major OECD centres lack the means to enforce the 'know your customer' standards they have designed, committed to and imposed on others. Instead, it seems that these countries have simply chosen not to comply with important international benchmarks..."

The recent significant income tax increase in the UK has caused concern with almost all fund managers (94%). Most London based fund managers have said that they would consider having an additional office elsewhere as a result of the tax increase. The tax increase might be the last straw for fund managers in the UK. It was commented that because of the high income and capital taxes, legitimate tax planning and offshore structures have increased and will continue to increase. This again, might be good news for the Cayman Islands, which may prove to be a benefactor.

For the Cayman Islands however the task of finding a level playing field to stand up and defend itself has always been a tall order. This time around it seems that Cayman might have allies in the private sectors onshore, which have quickly surmised that everyone's bottom dollar is at risk with the implementation of the Directive and the general attack on the offshore centres.

We invite you to visit for a summary of the Investment Funds legislation in the Cayman Islands which has allowed Cayman to play a leading role in the industry.


1. Financial News, 13th July, 2009

2. AIMA media release 4th August 2009

3. An Industry in Transformation, 2009

4. STEPJOURNAL , July/August 2009

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.