Cayman Islands: Application Granted For Sanction To Enter Into A Litigation Funding Agreement

Last Updated: 6 November 2018
Article by Ben Hobden, Róisín Liddy-Murphy, Paul Smith and Kevin Butler

In the recent decision of in In the Matter of the Companies Law (2018 Revision) and In the Matter of Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P. (In Official Liquidation) the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands granted an application seeking sanction to enter into a litigation funding agreement.


The application was brought by the joint official liquidators (the "JOLs") of Platinum Partners Arbitrage Fund L.P (the "Master Fund") for sanction to enter a litigation funding agreement with LL Finance LLC ("LLF"). Some of the creditors of the Master Fund purport to hold non possessory security interests in the Master Fund's assets (the "PSCs") in respect of liabilities which are considerably greater than net realisations to date. The JOLs informed the Court that funding was required in order to carry out investigations and to pursue litigation for the benefit of the Master Fund's stakeholders. There was a real possibility that, without litigation, no distributions would be made to the unsecured stakeholders of the Master Fund.

An unusual aspect of the application was that the JOLs sought an order that amounts due to LLF would be paid as an expense of the liquidation (thus granting those amounts due statutory priority) save for when amounts may be due to the PSCs. In such an occurrence, the JOLs said, the sums due to LLF should be paid as an expense incurred in realising the proceeds of the litigation. This was necessary as the JOLs had been unable to determine whether certain claims belonged to the secured or unsecured estate.

White Rock Properties LLC Dispute

The application was opposed by White Rock Properties LLC ("White Rock"), one of the PSCs. The submissions filed were brief and were not supported by evidence. They noted that White Rock did not oppose the principle of funding being obtained by the JOLs to enable them to pursue litigation; rather their concerns related to certain terms of the Funding Agreement and the failure, in their view, of the JOLs to provide sufficient information to allow White Rock to satisfy itself that its rights and position as a PSC were adequately protected.

The Court was advised that the other PSCs were on notice of the proceedings and did not support White Rock's opposition or appear at the hearing, but they also did not consent to or support the JOLs' application.

The Issues Arising on the Application

The following issues were considered by the Court;

  1. The impact and effect of the Funding Agreement on those who claim to have security interests over some or all of the Claims covered by the Funding Agreement (the PSCs) and whether the Court should sanction the Funding Agreement in the absence of the consent of the PSCs or where they object (the "PSC issue").
  2. Secondly, which powers the JOLs seek to exercise and whether in the circumstances the JOLs have satisfied the Court that it should exercise its discretion to sanction the exercise of these powers having regard to the applicable principles, in particular the principles set out in the Judgment of the Chief Justice in Re DD Growth1 (the "Discretion to Sanction Issue").
  3. Thirdly, whether the Funding Agreement is unlawful by reason of champerty and maintenance (the "Champerty and Maintenance Issue").

Grand Court Ruling

The Court found in favour of the JOLs on all of the above issues.

PSC Issue

The application relied both on the Court's general jurisdiction and on Section 142 (2) of the Companies Law (2018 Revision) which provides that;

"where the liquidator sells assets on behalf of a secured creditor, he is entitled to deduct from the proceeds of sale a sum by way of remuneration equivalent to that which is or would be payable under Section 109".

The applicant relied on various authorities in England and Australia to support the proposition that costs incurred by the liquidators in realising charged assets are payable ahead of the secured creditor's claims such as:

  • Re Berkeley Applegate2
  • Re Marine Mansions3
  • In Re Universal Distributing Co Ltd (in liquidation)4
  • Townsend -v- Biscoe5

The Court paid significant attention to the position of the PSCs and noted the absence of their involvement in the decision making process with respect to the secured Claims. The Court held that it was important that the JOLs have regard to the interests of those PSCs and satisfy themselves that those PSCs are properly protected.

However, particularly given the lack of objection to the funding agreement per se, notwithstanding the fact that the PSCs had been given notice of the application, the Court determined that it did have jurisdiction to affect the purported rights of the PSCs and order that any amounts realised on behalf of the PSCs would be subject to the obligations due to LLF under the funding agreement. The Court derived its jurisdiction from common law, determining that Section 142 (2) did not give it jurisdiction to make the order sought.

The Discretion to Sanction Issue

In seeking sanction of the Court in the exercise of powers falling within Part 1 of Schedule 3 to the Companies Law (2018 Revision) the applicant relied on the following principles set out in the Judgment of the Chief Justice in Re DD Growth Premium 2x Fund.6

  1. The Court must consider all the relevant evidence.
  2. The Court must consider whether the proposed transaction is in the commercial best interests of the company, reflected prima facie by the commercial judgment of the liquidator.
  3. The Court should give the liquidator's view considerable weight unless the evidence reveals substantial reasons for not doing so.
  4. The liquidator is usually in the best position to take an informed and objective view.
  5. Unless the Court is satisfied that, if the company is not permitted to enter the deal in question, there will be better terms or some other deal on offer, the choice is between the proposed deal and no deal at all.

White Rock did not challenge the JOLs position on the issue (beyond the challenge based on their own treatment dealt with in the PSC's issue). The Court accepted the submissions of the applicant on the discretion to sanction issue, particularly given the wide-ranging market testing carried out by the JOLs to determine that the LLF deal was commercially the most attractive.

Champerty and Maintenance Issue

Where the Court is asked to sanction a litigation funding agreement, its terms will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that it does not confer upon the funder any right to interfere in the conduct of the litigation or put the funder in a position in which it will be able to exert undue influence or control over the litigation (Re ICP Strategic Credit Income7).

The applicant relied on the Judgment in In A Company -v- A Funder.8 It was submitted that this case established that the crucial issue was whether the funding agreement has the tendency to corrupt public justice, undermine the integrity of the litigation process and give rise to a risk of abuse. Such a question requires the closest attention to the nature and surrounding circumstances of the agreement. The following seven features of a funding agreement were stated to have particular significance:

  1. the extent to which the funder controls the litigation.
  2. the ability of the funder to terminate the agreement at will or without reasonable cause
  3. the level of communication between the funded party and the solicitor.
  4. the prejudice likely to be suffered by a defendant if the claim fail;
  5. the extent to which the funded party is provided with information about, and is able to make informed decisions concerning, the litigation.
  6. the amount of profit that the funder stands to make and
  7. whether or not the funder is a professional funder and/or is regulated.

White Rock did not challenge the JOLs position on this issue. On balance and after careful consideration of the funding agreement and its terms, the Court granted the JOLs application and made the order to sanction to enter a liquidation funding agreement.


This Judgment should be welcomed by practitioners and is a timely reminder that the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands will be flexible and co-operate wherever possible in facilitating the recovery of monies for an estate by a liquidator. Nevertheless, the decision shows that liquidators, when considering a funding arrangement that will affect secured creditors, have regard to the interest of those secured creditors and satisfy themselves that on balance the interests of those secured creditors are properly protected.

Ben Hobden and Róisín Liddy-Murphy of Conyers Dill & Pearman acted on behalf of LL Finance LLC.


1. [2013] CILR (2) 361]

2. [1988] 4 BCC 279

3. Co LR 4 Eq 601

4. [1933] 48 CLR

5. [2010] WL 316608

6. Ibid

7. FSD 82 of 2010) (AJJ), unreported, 4 April 2014, at paras, 14, 18).

8. FSD 68 of 2017 (NSJ), unreported, 23 November 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Ben Hobden
Paul Smith
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions