Cayman Islands: First Ruling On "Fair Value" In The Context Of Cayman Companies Mergers

The decision of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands in Integra Group sets out important guidance as to how, where a shareholder has dissented to a statutory merger, the "fair value" of the dissenter's shares will be determined in accordance with the provisions of Part XVI of the Companies Law (2013 Revision) (the "Law").  This is the first time the Grand Court has considered this issue. 

In essence, it was held that: 

(a)  "fair value" means the shareholder's proportionate share of the business as a going concern without any minority discount or any premium for the forcible taking of their shares; and 

(b)  fair value should be proved by any methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and are otherwise admissible in court.  In Integra Group, this involved an appraisal process where the company was valued by two valuers who submitted their opinions to the Court and gave expert evidence. 

A group of shareholders had rejected an offer of US$10 per share and exercised their dissenting rights.  The Court held that the fair value of the company at the date of the merger was in fact US$11.70 per share, and ordered payment of that amount, plus interest, to be made to the dissenters.1

Statutory Mergers under the Law

Integra Group involved a management buy-out ("MBO") to be effected by way of a "merger" pursuant to the Law.  The Law creates an administrative process for completion of a merger which does not require any court sanction.  A plan of merger approved by the company's directors must be authorised by each company by way of special resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting ("EGM"), and any such other authorisations (if any) as may be required under the Articles of Incorporation of each company. 

Upon such approval, the merger will take effect in accordance with its terms, provided certain filing requirements have been met and the merger is approved by the Registrar of Companies.  

Typically in an MBO, the MBO investors will form a new company and merge the existing ("target") company into the newly formed company, which will be the surviving company.  Shareholders of the target company are usually paid cash or other consideration in exchange for their shares on the date of the merger.  The terms of the merger and the merger consideration are set out in a circular distributed in advance of the EGM.  The target company will often form a special committee of independent directors, who will obtain independent advice on the fairness of the merger terms made before recommending the merger to shareholders.  If sufficient shareholders approve the terms of the merger, the shares in the target company are cancelled or exchanged.  

Shareholders of the target company who disagree with the merger process or the price offered have two options.  The first is to try to prevent the merger from taking place by attempting to defeat the proposal at the EGM, or challenging the merger on the basis that the process of merger was not conducted properly and that the company has not met the requirements of the Law.  The second is to trigger the "dissenter's rights" process.  This is a mechanism whereby shareholders of the target company who dispute the fairness of the merger consideration received may ultimately seek an order of the Grand Court determining the "fair value" of the company's shares, and to recover the duly appraised fair value of their shares.  This is often referred to as an appraisal process.  A shareholder who intends to dissent from a merger must provide written objection before the vote on the merger is taken. 

Within 20 days of a successful vote for the merger the company must notify the dissenting shareholders of the outcome of the vote, and the dissenting shareholders then have 20 days to give the company formal written notice of an intention to dissent.  The formal notice of dissent must, among other things, include a demand to be paid the fair value of those shares.  The notice of dissent must be in respect of all of the dissenting shareholder's shares in the target company and will have the effect of extinguishing any rights of those shares, except for the right to be paid fair value.  Within seven days of the expiry of this period, or within seven days of the filing of the plan of merger, whichever is the later, the company must make a written offer to the dissenting shareholder to purchase their shares.  The dissenting shareholder and the company then have 30 days in which they are required to try to negotiate a fair price to be paid for the shares.  If they cannot agree, the company must (or the dissenting shareholder may) file a petition for a determination of fair value. 

Integra Group

Integra Group concerned the dissenter's rights process and the Court's appraisal of fair value, triggered following an MBO.

Integra was a Cayman Islands incorporated company which conducted business as an independent Russian oil field services and equipment manufacturing business.  In 2007 it listed on the London Stock Exchange ("LSE"), and investors could purchase Global Depository Receipts ("GDRs") on the LSE. 

The listed price of Integra's GDRs on the LSE significantly diminished after mid-2012 and by December 2013 the average GDR price was about US$15.74.  Integra's management proposed an MBO which was structured as a merger under the Law.  Integra appointed a special committee of independent directors, and obtained a fairness opinion as to the proposed offer.  In April 2014, the special committee recommended that investors accept an offer of US$20 per GDR (US$10 per share – each GDR being worth two shares) (the "Offer Price"), representing a premium of approximately 45% over the average trading price of the GDRs for the 30 trading days prior to the merger.  This indicated that Integra was valued at US$89.7 million. 

Following the publication of the merger offer and circular, an industry analyst who was monitoring Integra observed that the Offer Price appeared to be too low, and that if the offer was adjusted for a liquidity discount which had been reflected in the publicly traded price, a more realistic price would have been US$24 per GDR.  Nevertheless, the merger was adopted by special resolution (passed by about 80% of the shareholders who voted) and the merger was approved on 21 May 2014. 

Three dissenting shareholders (controlled by one fund management company and together holding a total of about 17.3% of Integra's issued GDRs) took the view that the Offer Price was too low.  They converted their GDRs to shares, opposed the merger at the EGM, and triggered the dissenter's rights process.  This resulted in the Court being requested to determine the fair value of Integra's shares.  

The Court directed that a full valuation process be conducted, with each side appointing an independent valuer for the purpose of producing a valuation report.  This involved the creation of a data room, multiple requests for information from the dissenting shareholders' expert, and two days of meetings between both experts and the MBO management team.  At the conclusion of that process, each expert valuer produced a report, and thereafter produced a joint report.  All of these documents were presented to the court.  A trial then took place in which each expert valuer was cross-examined on the opinions they had reached as to the value of the shares.   

Integra's Valuation Evidence

Integra's valuation expert concluded that the fair value of the dissenters' shares was less than the Offer Price, but declined to put a specific value on the company.  Applying a market valuation approach and a control premium to the publicly traded share price which was then cross-checked against a discounted cash flow ("DCF") valuation, Integra submitted that the fair value was somewhere in the range of US$70 - US$100 million.  Importantly, the Court noted that it was not particularly helpful to be given a range of values in this imprecise way.  Therefore, in future cases, valuers should take this guidance on board as to how they present their valuation evidence.  This valuation equated to a per share price of US$11.14 or US$9.89 depending on the number of shares taken into account.  In relation to the number of shares, two approaches were suggested: (i) the 8,973,473 of shares as set out in the circular; or (ii) a higher number of 10,107,344 (this would take into account allegedly unvested shares to be awarded post-merger by way of deferred remuneration to certain of Integra's directors and employees under its restricted stock unit plan). 

The Dissenters' Valuation Evidence

The dissenters' valuation expert concluded that fair value was more than the Offer Price and placed a specific price on his opinion of the value of the company as at the valuation date.  This was also determined using a market valuation approach, but the methodology was based on a combination of a DCF valuation and the guideline public companies method valuation (which relied upon financial and market information relating to publicly traded securities of companies comparable to Integra).  The dissenters' expert then weighted the two outcomes 75% / 25% in favour of the DCF valuation. 


The Court held that the fair value of Integra was higher than the Offer Price and higher than the highest estimate of the range of valuations provided by Integra's expert.  The dissenter's valuation evidence was preferred; with the Court discounting the valuation in places to reflect the conclusions it had reached as to how to assess "fair value".  This resulted in the Court deciding that Integra should be valued at US$105 million and that the fair value of each of Integra's shares was US$11.70.  

In reaching this decision, the Court took into account guidance concerning similar statutory merger processes which exist in the State of Delaware and Canada.  The following guidance can be taken from the Grand Court's decision: 

(a)  Fair value is the value to the shareholder of his proportionate share of the business as a going concern – it is a value that is "just and equitable" and provides adequate compensation consistent with the requirements of justice and equity.  Fair value does not include any premium for forcible taking of shares and a minority discount cannot be applied.  In determining fair value neither the upside nor downside of the transaction being dissented from should be taken into account (for example, any costs savings obtained by a company going private). 

(b)  Assessing fair value is a fact-based exercise, which requires an important element of judgement by the court.

(c)  Where a company's shares are listed on a major stock exchange this does not mean that a valuation methodology based upon its publicly traded prices is necessarily the most reliable.  Whether this valuation methodology is appropriate will depend on whether there is a well informed and liquid market with a large, widely held, free float.  As Integra's GDRs were an illiquid stock from 2012 onwards (with an increasing trend to illiquidity) the publicly traded share price methodology was not an appropriate valuation methodology to apply.  As such, the more nuanced approach of Integra's expert was to be preferred. 

(d)  The date for determining fair value was the date of the EGM – this was the date on which the offer could be accepted.  Importantly, the Court concluded that dissenting shareholders could not take advantage of the cost savings going forward as a result of the merger.  The Court's view was that dissenting shareholders should not benefit from any enhancement in the value of their shareholding attributable directly to the transaction from which they have dissented.  

(e)  A fair rate of interest to be paid by a company was the mid-rate between a company's assumed return on cash and its borrowing rate.  Applied to Integra this meant that the dissenting shareholders were entitled to interest at 4.95% calculated from 2 July 2014 (the date which Integra made its written offer to pay fair value of US$10 per share) until payment.


1. Maples and Calder acted for the dissenting shareholders.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions