Cayman Islands: First Ruling On "Fair Value" In The Context Of Cayman Companies Mergers

The decision of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands in Integra Group sets out important guidance as to how, where a shareholder has dissented to a statutory merger, the "fair value" of the dissenter's shares will be determined in accordance with the provisions of Part XVI of the Companies Law (2013 Revision) (the "Law").  This is the first time the Grand Court has considered this issue. 

In essence, it was held that: 

(a)  "fair value" means the shareholder's proportionate share of the business as a going concern without any minority discount or any premium for the forcible taking of their shares; and 

(b)  fair value should be proved by any methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and are otherwise admissible in court.  In Integra Group, this involved an appraisal process where the company was valued by two valuers who submitted their opinions to the Court and gave expert evidence. 

A group of shareholders had rejected an offer of US$10 per share and exercised their dissenting rights.  The Court held that the fair value of the company at the date of the merger was in fact US$11.70 per share, and ordered payment of that amount, plus interest, to be made to the dissenters.1

Statutory Mergers under the Law

Integra Group involved a management buy-out ("MBO") to be effected by way of a "merger" pursuant to the Law.  The Law creates an administrative process for completion of a merger which does not require any court sanction.  A plan of merger approved by the company's directors must be authorised by each company by way of special resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting ("EGM"), and any such other authorisations (if any) as may be required under the Articles of Incorporation of each company. 

Upon such approval, the merger will take effect in accordance with its terms, provided certain filing requirements have been met and the merger is approved by the Registrar of Companies.  

Typically in an MBO, the MBO investors will form a new company and merge the existing ("target") company into the newly formed company, which will be the surviving company.  Shareholders of the target company are usually paid cash or other consideration in exchange for their shares on the date of the merger.  The terms of the merger and the merger consideration are set out in a circular distributed in advance of the EGM.  The target company will often form a special committee of independent directors, who will obtain independent advice on the fairness of the merger terms made before recommending the merger to shareholders.  If sufficient shareholders approve the terms of the merger, the shares in the target company are cancelled or exchanged.  

Shareholders of the target company who disagree with the merger process or the price offered have two options.  The first is to try to prevent the merger from taking place by attempting to defeat the proposal at the EGM, or challenging the merger on the basis that the process of merger was not conducted properly and that the company has not met the requirements of the Law.  The second is to trigger the "dissenter's rights" process.  This is a mechanism whereby shareholders of the target company who dispute the fairness of the merger consideration received may ultimately seek an order of the Grand Court determining the "fair value" of the company's shares, and to recover the duly appraised fair value of their shares.  This is often referred to as an appraisal process.  A shareholder who intends to dissent from a merger must provide written objection before the vote on the merger is taken. 

Within 20 days of a successful vote for the merger the company must notify the dissenting shareholders of the outcome of the vote, and the dissenting shareholders then have 20 days to give the company formal written notice of an intention to dissent.  The formal notice of dissent must, among other things, include a demand to be paid the fair value of those shares.  The notice of dissent must be in respect of all of the dissenting shareholder's shares in the target company and will have the effect of extinguishing any rights of those shares, except for the right to be paid fair value.  Within seven days of the expiry of this period, or within seven days of the filing of the plan of merger, whichever is the later, the company must make a written offer to the dissenting shareholder to purchase their shares.  The dissenting shareholder and the company then have 30 days in which they are required to try to negotiate a fair price to be paid for the shares.  If they cannot agree, the company must (or the dissenting shareholder may) file a petition for a determination of fair value. 

Integra Group

Integra Group concerned the dissenter's rights process and the Court's appraisal of fair value, triggered following an MBO.

Integra was a Cayman Islands incorporated company which conducted business as an independent Russian oil field services and equipment manufacturing business.  In 2007 it listed on the London Stock Exchange ("LSE"), and investors could purchase Global Depository Receipts ("GDRs") on the LSE. 

The listed price of Integra's GDRs on the LSE significantly diminished after mid-2012 and by December 2013 the average GDR price was about US$15.74.  Integra's management proposed an MBO which was structured as a merger under the Law.  Integra appointed a special committee of independent directors, and obtained a fairness opinion as to the proposed offer.  In April 2014, the special committee recommended that investors accept an offer of US$20 per GDR (US$10 per share – each GDR being worth two shares) (the "Offer Price"), representing a premium of approximately 45% over the average trading price of the GDRs for the 30 trading days prior to the merger.  This indicated that Integra was valued at US$89.7 million. 

Following the publication of the merger offer and circular, an industry analyst who was monitoring Integra observed that the Offer Price appeared to be too low, and that if the offer was adjusted for a liquidity discount which had been reflected in the publicly traded price, a more realistic price would have been US$24 per GDR.  Nevertheless, the merger was adopted by special resolution (passed by about 80% of the shareholders who voted) and the merger was approved on 21 May 2014. 

Three dissenting shareholders (controlled by one fund management company and together holding a total of about 17.3% of Integra's issued GDRs) took the view that the Offer Price was too low.  They converted their GDRs to shares, opposed the merger at the EGM, and triggered the dissenter's rights process.  This resulted in the Court being requested to determine the fair value of Integra's shares.  

The Court directed that a full valuation process be conducted, with each side appointing an independent valuer for the purpose of producing a valuation report.  This involved the creation of a data room, multiple requests for information from the dissenting shareholders' expert, and two days of meetings between both experts and the MBO management team.  At the conclusion of that process, each expert valuer produced a report, and thereafter produced a joint report.  All of these documents were presented to the court.  A trial then took place in which each expert valuer was cross-examined on the opinions they had reached as to the value of the shares.   

Integra's Valuation Evidence

Integra's valuation expert concluded that the fair value of the dissenters' shares was less than the Offer Price, but declined to put a specific value on the company.  Applying a market valuation approach and a control premium to the publicly traded share price which was then cross-checked against a discounted cash flow ("DCF") valuation, Integra submitted that the fair value was somewhere in the range of US$70 - US$100 million.  Importantly, the Court noted that it was not particularly helpful to be given a range of values in this imprecise way.  Therefore, in future cases, valuers should take this guidance on board as to how they present their valuation evidence.  This valuation equated to a per share price of US$11.14 or US$9.89 depending on the number of shares taken into account.  In relation to the number of shares, two approaches were suggested: (i) the 8,973,473 of shares as set out in the circular; or (ii) a higher number of 10,107,344 (this would take into account allegedly unvested shares to be awarded post-merger by way of deferred remuneration to certain of Integra's directors and employees under its restricted stock unit plan). 

The Dissenters' Valuation Evidence

The dissenters' valuation expert concluded that fair value was more than the Offer Price and placed a specific price on his opinion of the value of the company as at the valuation date.  This was also determined using a market valuation approach, but the methodology was based on a combination of a DCF valuation and the guideline public companies method valuation (which relied upon financial and market information relating to publicly traded securities of companies comparable to Integra).  The dissenters' expert then weighted the two outcomes 75% / 25% in favour of the DCF valuation. 


The Court held that the fair value of Integra was higher than the Offer Price and higher than the highest estimate of the range of valuations provided by Integra's expert.  The dissenter's valuation evidence was preferred; with the Court discounting the valuation in places to reflect the conclusions it had reached as to how to assess "fair value".  This resulted in the Court deciding that Integra should be valued at US$105 million and that the fair value of each of Integra's shares was US$11.70.  

In reaching this decision, the Court took into account guidance concerning similar statutory merger processes which exist in the State of Delaware and Canada.  The following guidance can be taken from the Grand Court's decision: 

(a)  Fair value is the value to the shareholder of his proportionate share of the business as a going concern – it is a value that is "just and equitable" and provides adequate compensation consistent with the requirements of justice and equity.  Fair value does not include any premium for forcible taking of shares and a minority discount cannot be applied.  In determining fair value neither the upside nor downside of the transaction being dissented from should be taken into account (for example, any costs savings obtained by a company going private). 

(b)  Assessing fair value is a fact-based exercise, which requires an important element of judgement by the court.

(c)  Where a company's shares are listed on a major stock exchange this does not mean that a valuation methodology based upon its publicly traded prices is necessarily the most reliable.  Whether this valuation methodology is appropriate will depend on whether there is a well informed and liquid market with a large, widely held, free float.  As Integra's GDRs were an illiquid stock from 2012 onwards (with an increasing trend to illiquidity) the publicly traded share price methodology was not an appropriate valuation methodology to apply.  As such, the more nuanced approach of Integra's expert was to be preferred. 

(d)  The date for determining fair value was the date of the EGM – this was the date on which the offer could be accepted.  Importantly, the Court concluded that dissenting shareholders could not take advantage of the cost savings going forward as a result of the merger.  The Court's view was that dissenting shareholders should not benefit from any enhancement in the value of their shareholding attributable directly to the transaction from which they have dissented.  

(e)  A fair rate of interest to be paid by a company was the mid-rate between a company's assumed return on cash and its borrowing rate.  Applied to Integra this meant that the dissenting shareholders were entitled to interest at 4.95% calculated from 2 July 2014 (the date which Integra made its written offer to pay fair value of US$10 per share) until payment.


1. Maples and Calder acted for the dissenting shareholders.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Apr 2016, Webinar, George Town, Cayman Islands

A topical discussion on recent updates covering some of the more frequently asked questions around FATCA and CRS.

29 Jun 2016, Webinar, George Town, Cayman Islands

This webcast focuses on the impact FATCA and CRS are having on structured finance vehicles set up in the BVI, Cayman Islands and Ireland and covers in detail the impending reporting and notification deadlines in each of these jurisdictions.

11 Aug 2016, Webinar, George Town, Cayman Islands

Our panel of experts will reflect on the impact of LLCs in the month since the first available registration date and discuss why the LLC was introduced and how it can be used to help our clients.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.