Cayman Islands: The Trust Protector: A Survey of Cayman Cases Dealing With This "Creature of The Trust"

Last Updated: 19 January 2006
Article by Sara Collins and Morven McMillan

Originally published in ACTAPS Newsletter, November 2005.


The Oxford English Dictionary defines a protector as:

"A person who protects a person or thing from injury or danger; a defender, a guardian, a patron."

In spite of that clear-cut ordinary, natural meaning, the roles and duties of trust protectors can often be anything but. Despite the fact that it is increasingly common for Cayman law governed trust deeds to provide for the role of protectors, or protectors by some other name1, the role and liabilities of the trust protector as a matter of Cayman Islands law are not yet very clearly defined and there is little guidance available in the English common law.

To many, the concept of the trust protector conjures diverse images. Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry, holding the metaphorical gun to the head of the trustee, waiting for the poor old trustee to make his day. Alternatively, the moral and upstanding Gregory Peck or James Stewart type character, poring over the intricacies of every single trustee decision and torturing himself with the pros and cons of every exercise of his own powers under the trust deed, so that the trustee and beneficiaries are waiting for weeks and months for an answer. Or more commonly but perhaps equally controversial, the family’s faithful factotum, their loyal and longstanding friend, ready to spring to the defence of the Settlor at the drop of a hat and rejecting out of hand, any decision of the Trustee which gives the appearance of not following the Settlor’s wishes.

While none of the above scenarios is really accurate in a properly functioning trust, there is a serious point to be made. Where do we look for guidance as a matter of Cayman Islands law as to the role and liabilities of the trust protector?

Statutory guidelines

In the Cayman Islands, unlike some other offshore jurisdictions, there are no statutory guidelines in place to assist us in defining the role and liabilities of the trust protector. It is instructive to compare definitions from other jurisdictions.

In South Dakota, for example, the trust protector is defined as" … any disinterested third party whose appointment is provided for in the trust instrument."2 The use of the word "disinterested" would apparently preclude beneficiaries of a trust (or indeed, anyone else who could be said to be interested, such as the settlor) from fulfilling the role of trust protector.

In the Cook Islands, a trust protector is defined as:

"a person who is the holder of a power which, when invoked, is capable of directing a trustee in matters relating to the trust and in respect of which matters the trustee has a discretion …"3

What about the position in English law? There are as yet no statutory definitions which might assist in constructing a definition for Cayman law purposes nor are there any reported decisions of the English courts which might provide some guidance.

In the absence of statutory guidance in the Cayman Islands, or any analogy to be drawn from English statute or common law, the first port of call is the terms of the trust instrument itself. As a result, questions concerning trust protectors are often dealt with as a question of construction of the powers of the protector conferred by the trust instrument. In the decision of Smellie J in Re Omar Family Trust the Protector was described as a "creature of the trust" and to a certain extent the Protector is what the trust instrument makes him. The protector’s powers can be wide-ranging, including:

the power to determine the proper law of the trust;

  1. the power to change the forum of administration of the trust;
  2. the power to add or exclude beneficiaries;
  3. the power to appoint or remove trustees;
  4. the power to consent or withhold their consent to particularized actions of the trustees.

Commonly, they can include, as well as those powers set out above, the power to (dis)approve the trustee’s distribution decisions, to make or (dis)approve amendments to the trust deed, to supervise the exercise of reserved powers by the Settlor, to determine whether the Settlor is suffering from mental or physical incapacity to the extent that the Settlor should be determined incapacitated and his reserved powers terminated or perhaps transferred to the protector or trustee, to scrutinise and approve the trust accounts, to supervise investments or to invest, to approve or disapprove trustee’s remuneration.

Cayman case law

There are three reported cases in the Cayman Islands which contain important guidance on the role of trust protectors. In Re Omar Family Trust4, the trust protector, who was also a beneficiary of the trust, brought an action to replace the trustee. This action was opposed by the principal beneficiary of the trust who argued that it was the trust protector, and not the trustee, who was guilty of wrongdoing. The trustee made an application by originating summons for an order allowing its costs on a pre-emptive basis in the protector’s action and the Court granted the order. The Trustee had indicated that it intended to take a neutral position in relation to the dispute between the beneficiary and the protector but wished to place all evidence within its possession and control before the court and to explain to the court its concerns about the protector’s actions and the reasons for those concerns.

The basis for the court’s ruling was that the protector is a creature of the trust instrument and the propriety of its exercise of the power to remove the trustee was therefore a question of construction of the trust instrument. The real question therefore, according to Harre CJ, was "as to the true construction of the trust and in particular the powers and duties of the trustee vis a vis the protector" and a full presentation by the Trustee in the manner anticipated was necessary in determining that question. The learned judge therefore treated this as a case in which Kekewich J’s observation in Re Buckton that, on questions of construction and administration the trustees are entitled to the fullest possible protection the court can give them, was apposite.

In Lloyds Bank International (Cayman) Limited –v- Byleven Corporation S.A.5 the plaintiff trustee made a Beddoe application for directions as to whether it should actively defend proceedings in New York which had been brought by the administrators of the settlor’s estate to remove the shareholders of the corporate protectors of the trust. One of the intentions behind the New York proceedings was to gain control of the powers of appointment which had been vested in the corporate protectors in order to have 50% of the assets distributed in accordance with the settlor’s will. On the trustee’s application to the Cayman court, it was authorised to defend the New York proceedings and to indemnify itself from the trust fund in doing so. The court considered that the trustee had a duty to defend the trust in the New York proceedings and to safeguard the interests of the beneficiaries of the trust who would otherwise not be able to so defend it. The court also held that the protectors could be authorised to defend the New York proceedings jointly with the Trustee.

The Court declined the opportunity to consider whether the protectors owed fiduciary duties in that particular case6, on the basis that there was no need to do so and instead, based its decision on the Cayman authority of In Re Lemos7 which established that a trustee can be empowered to give support to persons jointly defending a trust fund. Schofield J said expressly that it was not a pre-requisite to such an order that the person defending jointly would themselves be entitled to an indemnity from the fund.

Finally, the case of Re Z Trust [1997] CILR 248, principally concerned the classification of a wide power to amend the trust which had been vested in the trust’s management committee. The management committee was made up of beneficiary and non-beneficiary members and, in addition to the power to amend, had various powers to supervise the trustee in relation to investment and the administration of the trust. The power to amend was exercisable by the management committee only jointly with the settlor and only prior to the death of the settlor or her daughter. The settlor’s daughter was the principal income beneficiary of the trust and a member of the management committee. In the event, the power was exercised to amend the trust to give the settlor’s daughter 50% of the capital, to which she had hitherto not been entitled. The contingent capital beneficiaries challenged this exercise of the power on the basis that the power in question was a fiduciary power and the management committee could not exercise it to benefit one of their number.

Smellie CJ held that the question was one of construction of the power in all of the circumstances of the case8, accepting counsel’s observation that "the nature of powers may be as varied as the circumstances of the settlements under which they are given" (this could certainly be said of protectors’ powers). He concluded that the power of amendment was a personal power (implicitly subject to the fraud on the power doctrine but not subject to fiduciary duties) notwithstanding the fact that other powers conferred on the management committee were arguably fiduciary powers. It appears from his judgment that central to this decision were the facts that (1) the power was given to a management committee which included beneficiaries; (2) the settlor’s intention from the terms of the deed that the power was not to be limited to benefiting only those family members not on the management committee and (3) the limit on the exercise of the power only jointly with the settlor and during the lifetime of the settlor or the daughter in question.

It can also be gleaned that, no matter whether a particular power is construed as personal or fiduciary, it will be subject to certain controls, such as the requirement to exercise it in good faith and in accordance with its purpose and that the court will interfere in the exercise of a protector’s powers (even if personal) to restrain excessive exercise or a fraud on the power. It is also, of course, arguable that, notwithstanding questions of construction of particular powers, the role itself is a fiduciary one so that the court has inherent jurisdiction to appoint or remove a protector. As far as we are aware, there has been no reported decision on this in the Cayman Islands.

It is worthy of note that the court will approach questions concerning the powers of protector as questions of construction; that it may make a difference whether the protector is a beneficiary or not and that certain powers (such as the power to remove or appoint or control trustees) are arguably always fiduciary although it should be noted that the Chief Justice said (obiter) in Re Z that even a power to direct trustees regarding the administration of the trust may not be fully fiduciary where (as in that case) vested in a beneficiary who is within the class of its objects (in which case the beneficiary would simply be required to act in good faith in exercising the power).

In Re Z, the Grand Court affirmed the Bahamian decision in Rawson Trust v Perlman [1990] 1 BOCM 135 in which the Bahamian court was faced with the question whether the protector’s power to consent to a re-settling of trust funds was fiduciary and the Bahamian court held that it was not fiduciary as the protector was a beneficiary and the trust settlement expressly allowed him to further his own interests.

Applications for directions?

What would a trustee do if he were to disagree with the exercise of a protector’s power? Depending on the circumstances, it may well be open to the trustee to apply to the court for directions and section 48 of the Cayman Islands Trusts Law (2001 Revision) provides the mechanism for doing so. Clearly, it would depend on the circumstances of the decision with which the trustee disagreed, for example, whether the exercise of the protector’s power was clearly capricious, wholly unreasonable, or malicious.

What should a trust protector do if a trustee does something with which the protector disagrees? The trust protector, if he is not a beneficiary, has no proprietary interest in the trust assets and yet he may, depending on the nature of his powers, have an interest in knowing that the trustee has exercised its powers in accordance with the trust instrument.

The recent Jersey case of Re The Hare Trust (2001) 4 ITELR 288 appears to confirm that principle and would be persuasive authority in the Cayman Islands. A trust protector had the power to appoint new trustees but if he failed to do so within a certain period of time, the outgoing trustee could appoint its own replacement. The retiring trustee in that particular case went ahead and appointed its replacement without reference to the protector and so the protector brought an action in the Jersey Royal Court. The Court held that the appointment of the new trustee was invalid. To the extent that the trust protector has an interest in the trust therefore, it is not only in knowing that he has exercised his own powers validly but it is also in knowing that the trustee has exercised its powers in accordance with the trust instrument.

What about the beneficiaries? Order 85 of the Grand Court Rules permits an executor, or administrator of an estate, a trustee, a beneficiary or an estate or trust (not being a special trust), or an enforcer of a STAR trust, to bring an action for relief9 including

" the advice or opinion of the Court on any question respecting the management of the estate or trust or the enforcement of a special trust."


The concept of the trust protector has been rejected by some on the basis that it is unnecessary, an artifice behind which the settlor is exercising direct control, or perhaps even that its existence offends the basic concepts of a trust. Others have embraced the concept as an attractive intermediary role between the trustee and the settlor and beneficiaries and an opportunity to act in the best interests of the trustee, the settlor and the beneficiaries. Regardless of which side is correct, the role of trust protector appears to be here to stay and as litigation increases and the law develops in this area, the role will become increasingly defined. We expect that the Cayman courts will deal with the role in the future and will do so in keeping with the approach that has developed – as question of construction of the trust instrument unless and until there is any statutory guidance on the question.

ACTAPS Newsletter is only available to ACTAPS members


1. A trust protector can be described as "an adviser"or "an appointor" or a Trust Committee or a Management Committee, for example. Some jurisdictions have even combined the role of investment manager with that of protector, but in the Cayman Islands the two functions are usually quite distinct.

2. South Dakota Codified Laws Ann. Sec. 55-1B-1 (1997)

3. Cook Islands International Trust Act (1984) (as amended)

4. Re Omar Family Trust [2000] WTLR 713

5. [1994-95] CILR 519

6. Schofield J said "It may well be that the protectors have no fiduciary duties to the trusts (and I offer no view in that regard). The trustee owes those fiduciary duties and it is the trustee which will control the defence of the case and the costs expended."

7. [1992-93] CILR 291

8. Stating that "the objective is to determine whether the powers in this case were personal or fiduciary and it is a determination which must be arrived at within the context of the circumstances of this case".

9. For which see GCR Order 85, rule 2 generally

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.