Cayman Islands: Joint Official Liquidators Of Saad Investments Co Ltd Successfully Appeal Decision On The Possible Validity Of Common Law Trusts Over Property Situated In A Civil Law Jurisdiction

Last Updated: 31 December 2014
Article by Carlos de Serpa Pimentel

Akers (and others) v Samba Financial Group [2014) EWCA Civ 1516


Mr Al-Sanea, owner of certain shares in five Saudi Arabian companies (including the respondent Samba Financial Group (Samba)), purported to transfer the beneficial interest in those shares by six transactions (Transactions) which included declarations of trust in favour of Saad Investments Company Limited (Saad), the appellant company in liquidation. Saad had been incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Shortly before Saad was wound up, a disposition of the shares was made to Samba. The appellant joint official liquidators (JOLs) of Saad claimed that Saad had a proprietary interest in the shares, which was necessary for the declaration sought by the JOLs under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 that the subsequent disposition of shares to Samba was void (with the JOLs valuing the shares at approximately USD 318 million at the relevant time, if the shares were beneficially owned by Saad, a disposition of the shares to Samba would have given Samba priority over other creditors of Saad to the extent of that value). Since the four later Transactions did not refer to any express choice of law, and the choice of law of the two earlier Transactions purported to be the laws of Bahrain/Saudi Arabia, which according to the Court's judgment do not recognise the concept of a trust or the division of legal and beneficial interests in shares, deciding whether or not these Transactions resulted in Saad obtaining a proprietary interest in the shares proved problematic. The Convention thus became relevant in determining the governing law. The trial judge held that Saudi Arabia was the forum conveniens, effectively ending any challenge to the validity of the disposition of the shares to Samba. The JOLs took the position it was arguable that the trusts in favour of Saad were governed by Cayman Islands law and therefore valid.

On appeal, substantial submissions were made on the interpretation of Article 4 of the Convention. The first question the Court had to determine was whether Article 4 applied to exclude the application of the Convention to the six Transactions. In a characteristically clear and thoughtful judgment, Lord Justice Vos distinguished between the capacity to alienate property (governed by lex situs under the common law conflicts rules) and the capacity to create the trust structure (governed by the law of the trust). The Court further distinguished between the capacity of a settlor to alienate property at all and the capacity of a settlor to alienate an interest in shares by way of declaration of trust. On this topic, it was held that as long as the property which is the subject of a trust can be alienated at all under the lex situs (in this case, Saudi Arabia), questions as to the validity and effect of placing such assets in trust, even though the assets are shares held in a civil law jurisdiction, can be determined by the governing law of the trust. In the context of the six Transactions, the declarations of trust would therefore not have divided the legal and equitable interests in the shares since that apparently would not be possible under Saudi Arabian law, but they might have given Saad rights under the trusts in respect of those shares that would have to be determined by the governing law of the trusts, taking into account that the division of equitable and legal interests is not possible under the lex situs. The Court held that these issues would be determined at the next stage of the litigation.

It was held that the declarations of trust in the later Transactions could not be described as acts by virtue of which assets are transferred to the trustee pursuant to Article 4, since the owner of the shares, Mr Al-Sanea, had already owned the shares and simply declared that he held them in a new capacity: beneficially for Saad. The Court found that the trial judge had addressed the wrong question: that it ought not to have been the broad question of whether English conflicts rules generally require the ownership of shares to be determined by the lex situs, but the more specific question of whether the alienation of the equitable interests in the shares under the declarations of trust in the Transactions was excluded from the provisions of the Convention by Article 4 (to which the Court's answer was that it was not for the reasons already stated).

In considering whether Article 15 meant that mandatory rules of Saudi Arabian law must be applied to the purported transfers of the beneficial interests in the shares under the declarations of trust, the Court held that the objective of Article 15(d) is that the law of the trust does not override the mandatory rules of the lex situs concerning transfers of title to property. In other words, the governing law of the trust under the provisions of the Convention could not exempt compliance with any legal formalities for the valid transfer of property situated in the country where such formalities are required. It was also determined on appeal that whether Article 15 applied, and in this case whether the supposed "mandatory rules" for the alienation of shares under Saudi Arabian laws were in fact mandatory, were not matters to be decided on a stay or summary judgment application as these questions required expert evidence on Saudi Arabian law and cross examination of expert witnesses in trial.

As to the issue of whether Articles 6 and 7 applied Saudi Arabian law and whether that issue ought to have been determined on a stay application, the Court found that while the trial judge rightly considered that disputed questions of Saudi Arabian law could not be determined on a stay application, Article 7 did not overwhelmingly support the conclusion that the governing law of each trust was that of Saudi Arabia/Bahrain. The Court held that it was at least arguable, with regard to Article 6, that it was implied by the terms of the declarations of the later Transactions that they were to be governed by Cayman Islands law, being a common law regime that would recognise the trusts. The matter had to be determined in light of the circumstances of the case and the limited factual evidence presented in the High Court was not sufficient to come to a definitive conclusion. A full evidential hearing of the background information with respect to the Transactions was necessary and since the background of the later Transactions was likely to be related to the background of the earlier Transactions, it would be undesirable to stay part of the proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens, even if it seemed likely that the two earlier Transactions were governed by Saudi Arabian law. It was also restated obiter that "the objects of the trust" as construed under Article 7 in ascertaining the law with which the trust is most closely connected, must also include the intention to benefit the beneficiaries.

As to the final issue of whether Article 5 disapplied the Convention so that the common law rules applied (resulting in Saudi Arabian law being the governing law), the Court agreed with the trial judge that this question also could not be decided on a stay application because of the need to hear further evidence on the background of the Transactions. Therefore, it is clear that the questions as to the application of Articles 15, 5, 6 and 7 could only be determined after a full evidential hearing in light of the circumstances of the case.


The main points to note from this judgment are the Court's finding that, on the assumption that the governing law of the trusts was Cayman Islands law, Article 4 did not exclude the application of the provisions of the Convention to the declarations of trust as the declarations themselves did not transfer anything to the trustee, specifically in the later Transactions where Mr Al-Sanea already owned the shares. Furthermore, even though the law of Saudi Arabia as the lex situs would govern Mr Al-Sanea's capacity to alienate the shares at all, Cayman Islands law would govern his capacity to alienate an interest in the shares by way of declaration of trust and the transfer of the beneficial interest effected by the declarations. This distinction will be important for lawyers in common law jurisdictions to keep in mind when creating such mixed trusts over property situated in civil law countries. Any decisions in the subsequent stages of this litigation may bring further clarity to the interpretation of the provisions of the Convention and certainty as to the governing law and validity of such trusts. Settlors of such trusts already in existence will likely be comforted by this decision as it appears to favour maintaining the validity of such trusts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions