Cayman Islands: Hanging By A Thread: The Re-Modelling Of Modified Universalism

On 10 November 2014, the Privy Council handed down its decision in Singularis Holdings Limited v PricewaterhouseCoopers1, together with its decision in a related case, PricewaterhouseCoopers v Saad Investments Company Limited2, both on appeal from the Court of Appeal in Bermuda.  The decision provides guidance on the application of the principle of modified universalism.  

By way of background, Grant Thornton had been appointed as official liquidators to Singularis Holdings Limited ("Singularis") and Saad Investments Company Limited ("SICL" and together with Singularis, the "Companies") in the Cayman Islands, the Companies' jurisdiction of incorporation.  The liquidators obtained orders in the Cayman Islands pursuant to section 103(3) of the Companies Law (2013 Revision) against PricewaterhouseCoopers ("PwC"), the Companies' auditors registered in Bermuda, requiring PwC to deliver to the liquidators any "property or documents belonging to the Companies" in order to assist the liquidators in tracing assets.  PwC took the position, which was not contested by the liquidators, that as a matter of Cayman Islands law, the requirement to produce documents pursuant to orders made under section 103(3) of the Companies Law, was not sufficiently broad to include PwC's internal working papers because those documents would not be considered as "belonging to" the Companies.  This is the generally accepted interpretation of section 103(3) of the Companies Law, albeit this interpretation of the section has never been tested.  

The liquidators subsequently obtained recognition of their appointment to Singularis from the Bermudan Court and an order winding up SICL in Bermuda.  The liquidators then sought the production of PwC's internal working papers in reliance upon (i) section 195 of the Bermudan Companies Act 1981, which applied to SICL as a company being wound up in Bermuda, and (ii) the common law principles of modified universalism applicable in insolvency proceedings, in respect of Singularis.  In both cases, the liquidators considered that the orders which could be made by the Bermudan Court requiring PwC to produce documents and information would be wide enough to include PwC's internal working papers and would not be limited to documentation or information belonging to the Companies.  This is because section 195 of the Bermudan Companies Act 1981 is in broader terms than section 103(3) of the Cayman Islands Companies Law.  

At first instance and on appeal, the liquidators obtained the relevant orders against SICL, but ultimately the Privy Council found that there was no jurisdiction to wind up SICL in Bermuda, that the liquidation should be stayed and that consequently the orders requiring the production of information and documents (which were based on the premise that SICL was being wound up in Bermuda) could not stand.  

In respect of Singularis, no winding up order was ever sought in Bermuda and the application for the production of information and documents was based on common law principles only.  At first instance, the Supreme Court in Bermuda made the orders sought against PwC on the basis that there was a common law power to do so "by analogy with the statutory powers contained in section 195 of the Companies Act".  The Bermudan Court of Appeal disagreed and reversed the decision.  The Privy Council was therefore asked to consider the following questions on the Singularis appeal:

(a)   Did the Bermudan Court have a common law power to assist a foreign liquidation by ordering the production of information in circumstances where (i) the court had no jurisdiction to wind up Singularis and (ii) its statutory power to order the production of information was limited to cases where the foreign company was being wound up in Bermuda? 

(b)   If such a power exists, can it be exercised in circumstances where an equivalent order could not have been made by the foreign court where the liquidation was proceeding? 

In considering these questions, the Privy Council was obliged to address the apparent conflict between Cambridge Gas v Committee of Navigator Holdings and Rubin v Eurofinance and to give guidance as to whether the principle of modified universalism as articulated by Lord Hoffman in Cambridge Gas was correct.  By a three to two majority, the Privy Council found that in principle there was a common law power to assist a foreign court by ordering the production of documentation and information to facilitate the collection of assets in a liquidation.  However, the Privy Council found that this power was not exercisable in circumstances the liquidators could not have obtained similar relief in their home jurisdiction. 

The following points can also be taken from the majority Privy Council decision: 

(a)   The general principle of modified universalism identified in Cambridge Gas has been upheld in theory and nothing in Rubin purported to say otherwise. 

(b)   However, the principle is much more limited in scope than articulated in Cambridge Gas.  In particular, the "golden thread" of modified universalism in insolvency proceedings does not mean that the domestic court has a common law power to assist the foreign court by doing whatever it could have done in a domestic insolvency.  This is because the principle of modified universalism is subject to local law and local public policy and the domestic court can only ever act within the limits of its own statutory and common law powers.  To this extent Cambridge Gas is overruled; the first instance decision in the Cayman Islands case of Irving H Picard and Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC v Primeo Fund is wrong and the earlier Privy Council decision (on appeal from the Cayman Islands) Al Sabah v Grupo Torras SA is approved. 

(c)   In this regard, just because there would be a statutory power to make a particular order in a domestic insolvency, does not mean that a similar power automatically exists at common law so as to be available to a foreign office holder seeking assistance.  However, equally, the existence of a statutory power does not necessarily exclude the common law.  It will only do so where the "...statutory scheme can be said to occupy the field.  This will normally be the case if the subsistence of the common law power would undermine the operation of the statutory one, usually by circumventing limitations or exceptions to the statutory power which are an integral part of the underlying legislative policy."  The Grand Court reached a similar conclusion in Primeo. 

(d)   In the absence of a statutory power available to a foreign office holder, the question therefore becomes how far the common law should be developed to make the relevant power sought by the foreign office holder available to assist the foreign court.  The Privy Council considered that this does not admit to a single universal answer and depends on the nature of the power that the court is being asked to exercise.  The Privy Council therefore limited their consideration to the assistance sought in this case, namely the production of information and documentation.  

(e)   Given that Singularis was not being wound up by the Bermudan Court, section 195 of the Bermudan Companies Act 1981 did not apply and there was therefore no statutory power available to assist the Cayman liquidators under Bermudan law.  However, the majority of the Privy Council considered that there was a common law power to compel the production of information in oral or documentary form that was necessary (i) for the administration of a foreign winding up and/or (ii) to identify and locate the assets of the company.  

(f)   This power was subject to the following limitations: 

(i)   It is only available to assist foreign court appointed officers or equivalent public officers in an insolvency.  It is not available on a voluntary winding up, which is essentially a private arrangement that is not conducted by a court officer.  

(ii)   The power exists for the purpose of enabling the foreign court to surmount the problems posed in a worldwide winding up of the company's affairs by the territorial limits of the foreign court's powers.  Therefore the power does not allow foreign liquidators to do something that they could not do under the law pursuant to which they were appointed.  

(iii)   It is only available where necessary for the performance of the foreign office holder's functions. 

(iv)   The order must be consistent with the substantive law and public policy of the assisting court.  It follows that the power is not available for purposes which are properly the subject of other schemes for the compulsory provision of information, e.g. obtaining information for the purpose of actual or anticipated litigation. 

(v)   The exercise of the power is conditional upon the liquidators paying the third party's reasonable costs of compliance. 

As a result, the appeal was dismissed because the liquidators would not have had the power to require PwC to produce this documentation under Cayman Islands law. 

The Privy Council were not asked to consider whether auditors' working papers did or did not constitute the property of Singularis.  The liquidators had accepted that they did not.  However, interestingly, two members of the Privy Council stated that they wanted to express their doubt as to whether information which PwC acquired solely in their capacity as Singularis' auditors could be regarded as belonging exclusively to them simply because the documents in which they recorded that information were working papers and as such PwC's property.  It remains to be seen whether liquidators will seek to rely on these obiter statements in future applications pursuant to section 103(3) of the Companies Law to endeavour to obtain internal working papers from auditors. 


[2014] UKPC 36.

[2014] UKPC 35.

[2007] 1 AC 508.

[2012] UKSC 46.

[2013] 1 CILR 164.  See our update of 27 March 2013 entitled Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Cayman Cross Border Insolvency Cases for further information.

[2005] 2 AC 333.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Caroline Moran
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions