Cayman Islands: Insolvency And Liquidation Of Segregated Portfolio Companies In The Cayman Islands

Last Updated: 25 September 2012
Article by Jeremy Walton and Jayson Wood


In 1998, significant amendments were incorporated into the Cayman Islands Companies Law permitting the formation of a segregated portfolio company ('SPC'),1 principally for use in the insurance industry. In 2002, the SPC provisions were extended to apply to exempted companies.

Since 2002, the popularity of SPCs has gradually increased, including their use in other industries: at present, approximately 10% of mutual funds registered in the Cayman Islands are structured as SPCs.

Purpose of an SPC

The purpose of an SPC is essentially to provide an alternative to a typical multi-class company where the separation of assets and liabilities within the company is achieved by the creation of different classes of shares under the articles of association. The major downside for multi-class companies is that although they operate perfectly well while the company is carrying on business, upon an insolvent liquidation, the segregations break down and all company assets are available to meet all liabilities. To address this shortcoming, multiclass companies typically adopt the rather cumbersome safeguard of including limited recourse and non-petition clauses in all contractual documents. As with all contractual safeguards, however, their usefulness is subject to drafting or interpretation issues and potential challenges to their enforceability, and there is the additional risk that a contracting party may assert grounds such as estoppel or misrepresentation to avoid such safeguards.

The SPC provisions in the Companies Law (2011 Revision) ('CL') address these disadvantages of multi-class companies.

Features of an SPC

The salient feature of an SPC is that it gives statutory recognition to the distinction between segregated portfolios such that the assets and liabilities of one portfolio are confined to that portfolio.

SPCs are governed by Part XIV of the CL. To take advantage of the benefits conferred by Part XIV, the SPC must be registered as such with the Registrar of Companies.

The starting point is CL s. 216(1) which permits an SPC to create one or more segregated portfolios in order to segregate the assets and liabilities of the SPC held on behalf of one segregated portfolio from the assets and liabilities of other portfolios and also from assets and liabilities which are not held on behalf of any portfolio.

An individual segregated portfolio does not constitute a legal entity separate from the SPC (CL s. 216(2)). Therefore, in order to vest assets or create liabilities in a segregated portfolio, the SPC must enter in the relevant contract on behalf of such portfolio (CL s. 218(1)). Alternatively, the SPC may contract on its own behalf to acquire what the legislation terms as 'general assets' (CL s. 219). General assets are available to meet liabilities of the SPC which are not attributable to any of its segregated portfolios (CL s. 222), and if the articles of association permit, to meet the liabilities of a particular segregated portfolio to the extent the assets of the portfolio are insufficient to satisfy the liability (CL s. 221).

To protect the integrity of portfolio segregations, Part XIV imposes measures to guard against any intermingling of assets. The directors of an SPC have a statutory duty to establish and maintain procedures to ensure that assets of each segregated portfolio are identifiable from the assets of other portfolios and from the SPC's general assets (CL s. 219(6)).

The central provision in Part XIV which gives statutory recognition to the segregation of portfolios in an SPC is CL s. 220. This section provides an absolute prohibition against the assets of one portfolio being used for any purpose other than to meet the liabilities of that portfolio. It states as follows:

220. Segregated portfolio assets –

  1. shall only be available and used to meet liabilities to the creditors of the segregated portfolio company and holders of segregated portfolio shares who are creditors or holders of segregated portfolio shares in respect of that segregated portfolio and who shall thereby be entitled to have recourse to the segregated portfolio assets attributable to that segregated portfolio for such purposes; and
  2. shall not be available or used to meet liabilities to, and shall be absolutely protected from, the creditors of the segregated portfolio company and holders of segregated portfolio shares who are not creditors or holders of segregated portfolio shares in respect of that segregated portfolio, and who accordingly shall not be entitled to have recourse to the segregated portfolio assets attributable to that segregated portfolio.

Insolvency of an SPC

In considering the available remedies should an SPC encounter financial difficulties, Part XIV creates a clear (although perhaps unintended) distinction between individual segregated portfolios and the SPC as a whole.

In relation to the liquidation of an SPC as a single entity, the usual winding up rules prescribed by the CL apply equally to an SPC as to an exempted company. That is, a winding up of the SPC may be petitioned by (CL s. 94):

  • the SPC itself;
  • a creditor (including a contingent or prospective creditor); or
  • a shareholder,

on the grounds that the SPC is insolvent or that it is just and equitable to wind up the company (CL s. 92). If the petition is successful, an official liquidator, who must be a qualified insolvency practitioner, will be appointed to wind up the affairs of the fund.

The difference between winding up an SPC and winding up a multi-class company is that, as noted above, the segregations between portfolios will remain intact. Specifically, CL s. 223(1) provides that in the winding-up of an SPC, the liquidator:

  1. shall deal with the company's assets only in accordance with the procedures set out in section 219(6); and
  2. in discharge of the claims of creditors of the SPC and holders of SPC shares, shall apply the SPC's assets to those entitled to have recourse thereto.

As mentioned above, CL s. 219(6) imposes a statutory duty on the directors of an SPC to keep the assets of one segregated portfolio separate from other portfolios and from the general assets of the SPC. On a winding up, this obligation shifts to the liquidator.

The position in relation to individual segregated portfolios however is quite different, and at first glance, the only available remedy upon the insolvency of a portfolio is a receivership order.

In general terms, an application for a receivership order in respect of a segregated portfolio may be made by the SPC, a director of the SPC, or a shareholder or creditor of the segregated portfolio (CL s. 225(1)), on the grounds that the segregated portfolio assets are or are likely to be insufficient (after taking account of the SPC's general assets) to discharge creditor claims in respect of that portfolio (CL s. 224(1)(a)).

If a receivership order is made, the role of the receiver is to manage the assets of the segregated portfolio for the purpose of closing down the business the portfolio and distributing the assets to those entitled to have recourse to them (CL s. 224(3)). In undertaking this role, the receiver has all the functions and powers of the directors of the SPC as regards the particular portfolio (CL s. 226(1)).

It is difficult to understand why the Cayman Islands legislature saw fit to immunise individual segregated portfolios from being wound up when the main focus of Part XIV is centred around absolutely isolating one portfolio from other portfolios and from the SPC itself. It makes little sense for the legislation to provide for a portfolio to be closed down and its assets distributed via a receivership order, and then stop short of the final step of winding up and dissolving the portfolio. Indeed, the report of the Law Reform Commission recommending the creation of Part XIV stated that it was intended a segregated portfolio should be liquidated in exactly the same way as if it were a company. That intent, however, did not carry through to the final amendments to the CL.

Further, CL s. 225(1) allows a receivership order to be applied for by a shareholder of the segregated portfolio. This is inconsistent with CL s. 224(1)(a), which cites insolvency as the only basis upon which a receivership order can be made against a segregated portfolio. However, it is consistent with the premise that some wider range of remedies was at some point contemplated by the legislature, and this may be a partial answer to the anomaly which appears in the CL.

The ABC case

This anomaly was exposed in a recent case, ABC Company (SPC) v. J & Co Ltd (unreported, May 2012). It is significant because for the first time since the introduction of the SPC provisions in 1998, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has delivered a decision which considers in some detail the remedies available to an investor in a segregated portfolio where that portfolio (but not the whole SPC) is insolvent.

ABC was an open ended investment fund registered in the Cayman Islands as an SPC with 82 segregated portfolios. In 2008, ABC suspended redemptions for a number of portfolios which together represented 32% of the fund's net asset value. In 2010, ABC's articles of association dealing with suspension of redemptions were amended by the passing of special resolutions by each class of participating shareholders. Later in 2010, a disgruntled investor in one of the suspended portfolios petitioned to wind up ABC, or in the alternative, to wind up the segregated portfolio in which the investor was a shareholder, on the grounds that either or both were unable to carry on the business for which they were incorporated and had therefore lost their substratum.

The Court of Appeal held that both petitions were bound to fail and should be struck out for the following reasons:

  • The Court had no jurisdiction to wind up an individual segregated portfolio. Further, there was no provision in Part XIV allowing for the making of a receivership order in respect of an individual segregated portfolio at the suit of a shareholder on just and equitable grounds. The petition to wind up the segregated portfolio itself must fail.
  • The directors of ABC acted bona fide in resolving to suspend redemptions in the segregated portfolios. – To determine whether the substratum of ABC had failed, it must be established that ABC had ceased carrying on business according to the reasonable expectations of its shareholders. To ascertain those expectations, regard must be had to ABC's articles of association and offering documents.
  • An informed investor reading ABC's articles of association and offering memorandum could not fail to understand there was a risk of share redemptions being suspended.
  • It was impossible to contend that ABC had ceased to carry on business in accordance with the reasonable expectations of its shareholders. As a result, the petition to wind up ABC must fail.

The decision of the Court of Appeal confirms that the only remedies available to a disgruntled investor in a segregated portfolio are to:

  1. apply for a receivership order on the grounds that the portfolio is insolvent: a receivership order is not available on the just and equitable ground, nor can a portfolio be wound up on any ground whatsoever; or
  2. subject to the operation of any enforceable non-petition clause, petition to wind up the SPC itself on the grounds of insolvency or on the just and equitable grounds should the circumstances of the case permit.

On the facts of the ABC case, the result is unsurprising. Indeed, it would have been rather startling had the Court ventured outside the plain wording of Part XIV, as the petitioner sought to do, so as to put the fund at risk of liquidation in circumstances where two-thirds of its portfolios were carrying on business as usual, and a substantial majority of shareholders had (albeit implicitly) ratified the directors' decision to suspend redemptions.

Nonetheless, although the outcome was a fair and predictable one, the decision does serve to highlight the fact that Part XIV needs to be overhauled as regards the liquidation of segregated portfolios. Not only is it illogical that an individual portfolio cannot be liquidated when liquidation of the entire SPC is not feasible (in cases like ABC), the receivership remedy is not an adequate alternative. The CL and the Companies Winding up Rules 2008 give various protective rights and entitlements to creditors and shareholders of a company in liquidation, but those statutory rights and entitlements are not afforded to creditors and investors in a portfolio in receivership. Both of these issues need to be addressed by the legislature amending Part XIV to permit individual portfolios to be wound up on the same grounds and in the same manner as SPCs and exempt companies.


1. Also known in other jurisdictions as a protected cell or segregated account company.

Article first published in International Corporate Rescue, September 2012

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Walton
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.