Cayman Islands: Mortgage Possession In The Cayman Islands -Legal & Procedural Issues

Last Updated: 6 September 2012
Article by Higgs & Johnson Counsel & Attorneys At Law

The economic downturn has resulted in an increase in mortgage defaults and a consequential increase in mortgage possession actions. Whether the funds were borrowed to own a "dream" home or set up and operate a business, the straitened economy has caused lenders and borrowers alike to review their commitments and search for solutions.

In this article, we will consider the legal and procedural issues as they pertain to mortgage possession proceedings in the Cayman Islands, before focusing upon the specific issue of sale by private treaty. Before embarking on that process a brief historical note will put the subject into context.

History of the Mortgage

The law of mortgages is of some antiquity and has undergone considerable development over the years. From an English law perspective, a useful starting point would be the derivation of the word "mortgage" from the French, meaning "dead pledge" as the term was used in the Middle Ages (the concept being that once the obligation to repay the loan had been fulfilled the pledge would then "die"). The mortgage itself is not a debt; it is the lender's security for the debt.

Common law jurisdictions have seen the development of two principal forms of mortgage, namely a mortgage by demise, and a mortgage by legal charge. In the Cayman Islands, as in modern English law, there is now only one type of mortgage, namely the legal charge.

Over the course of its development the mortgage has given rise to much law and has become subject to numerous legal concepts, including the equity of redemption (and clogs thereon), foreclosure, and novel disseisin. Thankfully, today's mortgage is free of many of its previous complexities but there are still areas of difficulty and vagueness which inevitably give rise to disputes and court proceedings.

Mortgages in the Cayman Islands

We can now turn to mortgages in the Cayman Islands, which are governed by the Registered Land Law ("RLL"). Specifically, Division 3 of the RLL deals exclusively with legal charges.

One of the more interesting features of the mortgage possession process in the Cayman Islands, is the apparent intention of the RLL to ensure that the borrower is treated fairly. The issuance and service of proper notices of default (a concept designed to give the borrower a belated opportunity to keep his property by performing his obligations under the legal charge) appear motivated to allow the borrower a second chance. This concept is similar, at its core, to the old legal provisions preventing a lender from placing any "clogs" on the borrower's right to redeem his mortgage.

Though the emphasis on fairness to the borrower is evident, this does not, however, mean that lenders have no legal remedies when dealing with defaulting borrowers.

Lenders' Legal Remedies

So the borrower is in arrears with his mortgage payments. He imitates the action of the ostrich and sticks his head in the sand. What is the lender to do?

The lender should initially write to the borrower to remind him he is in arrears and to request that the borrower communicate with him. All too often there is no response and so the lender is forced to resort to its legal remedies under the terms of the legal charge.

The first steps in the mortgage possession process involve the proper service on the borrower of notices under RLL sections 64(2) and 72. The section 64(2) notice is in effect the "demand". Under section 72, if the borrower is in default for one month, the lender may serve on him notice in writing to pay the monies outstanding.

The timing of service of these notices was the subject of Bank of Butterfield v E. Levy and A. Levy in 2004. In that case the charge provided for the borrower to make repayment of the capital borrowed plus interest. The borrower made no payment. The Plaintiff bank served both section 64(2) and section 72 notices simultaneously. The Grand Court confirmed that, as the two notices were designed to accomplish different and separate goals, in appropriate cases it was possible to serve section 64(2) and section 72 notices concurrently.

If the borrower fails to comply with the section 64(2) notice within three months of the date of service, the lender may seek a court order entitling it to appoint a receiver or sell the charged property. In most cases, this will lead to the sale of the security (i.e. the property encumbered with the charge). In some jurisdictions the process is complicated further by the extension of statutory protection to residential properties and dwelling houses (for example Florida, under the Homestead Exemption in Florida, which provides an exemption from forced sale and restrictions on demise and alienation, utilised famously by O.J. Simpson). The RLL does not make a distinction between commercial and residential property. However, sale of the property - even without this additional statutory protection - is not always a simple or straightforward process for a lender in the Cayman Islands.

A Current Concern - Public Auction or Private Treaty?

Section 75 of the RLL deals with the process by which the lender sells the property. The lender must act in good faith when seeking to sell the mortgaged property. An issue recently before the Cayman Grand Court was whether the lender must first seek to sell the property by public auction or whether it can proceed directly to a sale by private treaty.

Inevitably, a "forced sale" by auction will lead to a reduction in the market value of the property. Potential buyers often sniff the opportunity for a bargain. In a down market too many public auctions can also depress property values further by indicating a micro-climate of cheap available property. This would certainly seem to make the lender's job more difficult in establishing that it has acted in good faith in obtaining the best price reasonably possible.

In Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson in 2011 the learned Chief Justice concluded that it was the settled practice of the Court that the sale must be by public auction. The order could be "varied" to sale by private treaty, but only after a "fair attempt by the Chargee to sell by public auction". The Chief Justice ordered that the opportunity for sale by public auction (at a reserve price based upon independent valuation) must occur before the Plaintiff lender could restore its application to sell by private treaty.

The Chief Justice's thinking appears to have been guided by a long settled practice of the Court, albeit one which was not identified in his Judgment, along with notions of fairness to the defaulting borrower. The theory behind the Chief Justice's decision seems to be that sale by public auction is fair and will establish a market price. However, if an unfair (i.e. extremely low price) results from the public auction then more costs would be incurred by the lender, as it would have to make another Grand Court application in circumstances where it has already waited at least 4 months (and often much longer) to be placed in a position where the security can be sold.

In refusing the lender's application in Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson, the Chief Justice ruled (without hearing argument on behalf of NBS) that his reasons would apply to NBS v Wellington, which came before him on the same date.

This issue came before the Grand Court again in Cayman National Building Society v. Cranston in 2011. Though the facts of the case departed significantly from those of Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson, the legal analysis of Justice Quin did not rest heavily on these differences. Justice Quin relied instead on a plethora of case law and adhered to the script set out in the RLL (rather than an unspecified "long settled practice of the Court"). In his Judgment Justice Quin cites the decision of Chief Justice Malone in CNB v. Smith Pierson, holding that the Court has a general discretion, under section 18 of the Grand Court Law to impose "such conditions as were just when making orders".

Based on his review of the cases and the distinguishing features of the Butterfield case, Justice Quin concluded that this was an appropriate case to grant National Building Society leave to sell the property by way of private treaty rather than public auction. Justice Quin was able to find in favour of making the Order for sale by private treaty since, having reviewed case law that was not put before the Chief Justice, he was apparently persuaded that the "mischief" which concerned the Chief Justice could be avoided by not fixing a reserve price. Justice Quin cited with approval Justice Henderson's formulation (as set out in Scotiabank (Cayman Islands) Limited v Rankine) of how the true value of property can be ascertained, namely by having the property listed using the multiple listings service.

Notably, Justice Quin's rigorous legal analysis did not include reference to the 1986 case of Simmons v. Moxam in which the Court of Appeal set out guidelines for the sale of land pursuant to the Judicature Law, section 42(1). This case involved a judgment creditor Plaintiff (not a mortgagee) who applied for an order for sale of the judgment debtor's home in order to discharge a debt. It was noted by the Court of Appeal that, whilst section 42(1) of the Judicature Law provided for sale by public auction, the Court may approve sale by private treaty for special reasons. The Court of Appeal noted that there was no settled practice as to the sale of land and accordingly set out guidelines. It is not evident that these guidelines were considered in either of the more recent cases discussed above.


As matters stand the issue is unresolved, due to the recent conflicting decisions of Chief Justice Smellie and Justice Quin. This conflict must be considered and resolved so that borrowers and lenders alike have the desired certainty regarding the mortgage possession process. As the Cayman Islands property market continues to stagnate, a close eye will no doubt be kept on this most important aspect of mortgage possession law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Higgs & Johnson Counsel & Attorneys At Law
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.