Cayman Islands: Mortgage Possession In The Cayman Islands -Legal & Procedural Issues

Last Updated: 6 September 2012
Article by Higgs & Johnson Counsel & Attorneys At Law

The economic downturn has resulted in an increase in mortgage defaults and a consequential increase in mortgage possession actions. Whether the funds were borrowed to own a "dream" home or set up and operate a business, the straitened economy has caused lenders and borrowers alike to review their commitments and search for solutions.

In this article, we will consider the legal and procedural issues as they pertain to mortgage possession proceedings in the Cayman Islands, before focusing upon the specific issue of sale by private treaty. Before embarking on that process a brief historical note will put the subject into context.

History of the Mortgage

The law of mortgages is of some antiquity and has undergone considerable development over the years. From an English law perspective, a useful starting point would be the derivation of the word "mortgage" from the French, meaning "dead pledge" as the term was used in the Middle Ages (the concept being that once the obligation to repay the loan had been fulfilled the pledge would then "die"). The mortgage itself is not a debt; it is the lender's security for the debt.

Common law jurisdictions have seen the development of two principal forms of mortgage, namely a mortgage by demise, and a mortgage by legal charge. In the Cayman Islands, as in modern English law, there is now only one type of mortgage, namely the legal charge.

Over the course of its development the mortgage has given rise to much law and has become subject to numerous legal concepts, including the equity of redemption (and clogs thereon), foreclosure, and novel disseisin. Thankfully, today's mortgage is free of many of its previous complexities but there are still areas of difficulty and vagueness which inevitably give rise to disputes and court proceedings.

Mortgages in the Cayman Islands

We can now turn to mortgages in the Cayman Islands, which are governed by the Registered Land Law ("RLL"). Specifically, Division 3 of the RLL deals exclusively with legal charges.

One of the more interesting features of the mortgage possession process in the Cayman Islands, is the apparent intention of the RLL to ensure that the borrower is treated fairly. The issuance and service of proper notices of default (a concept designed to give the borrower a belated opportunity to keep his property by performing his obligations under the legal charge) appear motivated to allow the borrower a second chance. This concept is similar, at its core, to the old legal provisions preventing a lender from placing any "clogs" on the borrower's right to redeem his mortgage.

Though the emphasis on fairness to the borrower is evident, this does not, however, mean that lenders have no legal remedies when dealing with defaulting borrowers.

Lenders' Legal Remedies

So the borrower is in arrears with his mortgage payments. He imitates the action of the ostrich and sticks his head in the sand. What is the lender to do?

The lender should initially write to the borrower to remind him he is in arrears and to request that the borrower communicate with him. All too often there is no response and so the lender is forced to resort to its legal remedies under the terms of the legal charge.

The first steps in the mortgage possession process involve the proper service on the borrower of notices under RLL sections 64(2) and 72. The section 64(2) notice is in effect the "demand". Under section 72, if the borrower is in default for one month, the lender may serve on him notice in writing to pay the monies outstanding.

The timing of service of these notices was the subject of Bank of Butterfield v E. Levy and A. Levy in 2004. In that case the charge provided for the borrower to make repayment of the capital borrowed plus interest. The borrower made no payment. The Plaintiff bank served both section 64(2) and section 72 notices simultaneously. The Grand Court confirmed that, as the two notices were designed to accomplish different and separate goals, in appropriate cases it was possible to serve section 64(2) and section 72 notices concurrently.

If the borrower fails to comply with the section 64(2) notice within three months of the date of service, the lender may seek a court order entitling it to appoint a receiver or sell the charged property. In most cases, this will lead to the sale of the security (i.e. the property encumbered with the charge). In some jurisdictions the process is complicated further by the extension of statutory protection to residential properties and dwelling houses (for example Florida, under the Homestead Exemption in Florida, which provides an exemption from forced sale and restrictions on demise and alienation, utilised famously by O.J. Simpson). The RLL does not make a distinction between commercial and residential property. However, sale of the property - even without this additional statutory protection - is not always a simple or straightforward process for a lender in the Cayman Islands.

A Current Concern - Public Auction or Private Treaty?

Section 75 of the RLL deals with the process by which the lender sells the property. The lender must act in good faith when seeking to sell the mortgaged property. An issue recently before the Cayman Grand Court was whether the lender must first seek to sell the property by public auction or whether it can proceed directly to a sale by private treaty.

Inevitably, a "forced sale" by auction will lead to a reduction in the market value of the property. Potential buyers often sniff the opportunity for a bargain. In a down market too many public auctions can also depress property values further by indicating a micro-climate of cheap available property. This would certainly seem to make the lender's job more difficult in establishing that it has acted in good faith in obtaining the best price reasonably possible.

In Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson in 2011 the learned Chief Justice concluded that it was the settled practice of the Court that the sale must be by public auction. The order could be "varied" to sale by private treaty, but only after a "fair attempt by the Chargee to sell by public auction". The Chief Justice ordered that the opportunity for sale by public auction (at a reserve price based upon independent valuation) must occur before the Plaintiff lender could restore its application to sell by private treaty.

The Chief Justice's thinking appears to have been guided by a long settled practice of the Court, albeit one which was not identified in his Judgment, along with notions of fairness to the defaulting borrower. The theory behind the Chief Justice's decision seems to be that sale by public auction is fair and will establish a market price. However, if an unfair (i.e. extremely low price) results from the public auction then more costs would be incurred by the lender, as it would have to make another Grand Court application in circumstances where it has already waited at least 4 months (and often much longer) to be placed in a position where the security can be sold.

In refusing the lender's application in Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson, the Chief Justice ruled (without hearing argument on behalf of NBS) that his reasons would apply to NBS v Wellington, which came before him on the same date.

This issue came before the Grand Court again in Cayman National Building Society v. Cranston in 2011. Though the facts of the case departed significantly from those of Butterfield Bank v Jervis & Jackson, the legal analysis of Justice Quin did not rest heavily on these differences. Justice Quin relied instead on a plethora of case law and adhered to the script set out in the RLL (rather than an unspecified "long settled practice of the Court"). In his Judgment Justice Quin cites the decision of Chief Justice Malone in CNB v. Smith Pierson, holding that the Court has a general discretion, under section 18 of the Grand Court Law to impose "such conditions as were just when making orders".

Based on his review of the cases and the distinguishing features of the Butterfield case, Justice Quin concluded that this was an appropriate case to grant National Building Society leave to sell the property by way of private treaty rather than public auction. Justice Quin was able to find in favour of making the Order for sale by private treaty since, having reviewed case law that was not put before the Chief Justice, he was apparently persuaded that the "mischief" which concerned the Chief Justice could be avoided by not fixing a reserve price. Justice Quin cited with approval Justice Henderson's formulation (as set out in Scotiabank (Cayman Islands) Limited v Rankine) of how the true value of property can be ascertained, namely by having the property listed using the multiple listings service.

Notably, Justice Quin's rigorous legal analysis did not include reference to the 1986 case of Simmons v. Moxam in which the Court of Appeal set out guidelines for the sale of land pursuant to the Judicature Law, section 42(1). This case involved a judgment creditor Plaintiff (not a mortgagee) who applied for an order for sale of the judgment debtor's home in order to discharge a debt. It was noted by the Court of Appeal that, whilst section 42(1) of the Judicature Law provided for sale by public auction, the Court may approve sale by private treaty for special reasons. The Court of Appeal noted that there was no settled practice as to the sale of land and accordingly set out guidelines. It is not evident that these guidelines were considered in either of the more recent cases discussed above.


As matters stand the issue is unresolved, due to the recent conflicting decisions of Chief Justice Smellie and Justice Quin. This conflict must be considered and resolved so that borrowers and lenders alike have the desired certainty regarding the mortgage possession process. As the Cayman Islands property market continues to stagnate, a close eye will no doubt be kept on this most important aspect of mortgage possession law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Higgs & Johnson Counsel & Attorneys At Law
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions