In the TASSARRUF MEVDUATI SEGORTA FONU -v- MERRIL LYNCH
BANK AND TRUST COMPANY (CAYMAN) LTD & OTHERS (2011) UKPC
17, the Privy Council, permitted the appointment of an
equitable receiver, to exercise the power of revocation of a
settlor of a Cayman discretionary trust, so to enable a creditor to
procure the execution of such power, and to recover all the settled
assets, to satisfy his judgment debt.
Under the trust deed establishing the Cayman trust, the judgment
debtor/settlor of the trust, had a power of revocation, which
" This Trust may be revoked, amended, varied, or
altered in any manner, whatsoever from time to time, and at any
time, by the Settlor by deed and delivered to the Trustees,
provided always that no such revocation, amendment, variation or
alteration shall take effect, until actual receipt of such
instrument by the Trustees, or with the written consent of the
Trustees thereto, if such revocation, amendment, variation or
alternation would increase or extend the obligations, liabilities
or responsibilities of the Trustees".
The Privy Council held that:
The powers of revocation of a settlor of a discretionary trust,
are such, that in equity, in the circumstances of a case like the
one under consideration, the settlor/judgment debtor, can be
regarded as having rights tantamount to ownership.
The interests of justice require that an order be made in order
to make effective the judgment of the Cayman Court, recognizing and
enforcing the Turkish judgment.
NOTE: If the settlor has been made bankrupt,
the power of revocation of the trust, will automatically vest in
the trustee in bankruptcy.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Probably the most significant change from previous practice in Guernsey law under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008, which came into effect on the 1 July 2008, was the consignment to history of the concept of capital maintenance, which was discarded in favour of a solvency model as the basis of a company’s ability to pay distributions and dividends.
Please find attached our latest Appleby report which provides a snapshot of data in relation to petition filings and resultant court orders in six of our offshore jurisdictions.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).