Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands - Legal Aspects in 2002

Last Updated: 28 June 2002
Most Read Contributor in Cayman Islands, September 2018

By Wayne Panton of Walkers and Anne Forbes of Walkers (Europe)

The last twelve months in the aviation industry have been dramatic in the extreme. During what was widely regarded as a cyclical downturn in the market, the events of September 11th saw a sharp and immediate decline in aircraft business and traffic worldwide. The ensuing panic caused by the Insurance sector's reduction of third party liability coverage and the collapse of Sabena and Swissair made 2001 arguably the most difficult year in aviation history.

All this left the distant and temperate waters of the Cayman Islands relatively unscathed. While the initial aftershock of 9/11 slowed new business worldwide, confidence is slowly returning to investors and financiers in the aviation sector. Perhaps more significant for the Cayman Islands has been the Enron collapse and the impact this may have on the future of the Cayman Islands as an offshore financing location. Considered with the recent OECD and FATF initiatives in the past few years early indications are that the prognosis is good. With recent developments in securitisation techniques and the new possibility of registering private aircraft on the Cayman Aircraft Register, the appeal of the Cayman Islands does not seem at risk of fading.

The Cayman Islands has always been the most attractive jurisdiction for aircraft financing deals for numerous reasons. Without going over this well-travelled terrain too extensively, the legal and tax regime in place is conducive to establishing and operating special purpose vehicle ("SPV") transactions. Cayman Islands Law is based on English Law so the main issues central to these transactions relating to security interests, creditors rights, corporate power, limited liability and directors' "duties" are substantially similar. The absence of any direct taxes in the Cayman Islands and the certainty that this position will continue by virtue of the Government issuing a tax undertaking provides a lender with added comfort. Establishing a Cayman SPV is quick and inexpensive and no prior authorisations or licenses need to be obtained from the Government. The incorporation process can also be expedited to a same day service for a fee if necessary. Once established, the SPV can be managed by any one of a vast number of service providers based in Cayman. All of the major international accounting firms have offices in the Cayman Islands, and the major international banks and trust companies are also well represented.

For lenders, one of the most alluring features of the Cayman Islands is that their insolvency laws are known to be creditor friendly. Lenders also benefit from a robust security package which usually comprises a mortgage over the aircraft, a charge over an account or accounts into which the lease rentals are paid by the airline, a charge or assignment of insurance policies and warranties with respect to the aircraft and engines, a charge over all the rights and interests of the SPV in and to the transaction documents, and finally a charge over the shares of the SPV. All security documents will ordinarily be executed by power of attorney outside the Cayman Islands to avoid stamp duty liability in the case of documents which grant security interests. It is worth noting that the Registrar of Companies in Cayman does not maintain a central companies’ charge register but rather each Cayman company is required to keep a Register of Mortgages and Charges which details all mortgages and charges on any of the company’s assets. While failure to make an entry does not affect the validity of the security, it is an offence under Cayman Islands Law and could have a negative impact on the good standing of the Company and possibly trigger a default.

One of the only question marks over the Cayman Islands until recently was to what extent the OECD and FATF’s international initiatives would impinge on the Cayman Islands' success as the jurisdiction of choice for SPV business.

It became clear fairly quickly that the Cayman Islands were in a better position to accommodate the position of the OECD on harmful tax practices than other offshore centers because there is no form of direct taxation in the Cayman Islands so there are no preferential or discriminatory tax practices. As a result the Cayman Islands were one of the six jurisdictions which issued an advance commitment to the OECD in May 2000 to provide for exchange of information in relation to criminal and civil tax matters to be phased in over a five year period. This allowed the Cayman Islands and the five other jurisdictions to avoid the OECD "blacklist" which was issued the following June. Those countries blacklisted will be invited to make commitments to eliminate harmful tax practices, failing which, defensive measures will be implemented by member countries on the recommendation of the OECD. Defensive measures will mean a non-cooperative jurisdiction may be subjected to withholding taxes on payments to its residents, enhanced audit and enforcement activities, the denial of deductions, exemptions, credits or other allowances relating to transactions involving uncooperative tax havens. As a cooperating member the Cayman Islands will not be subjected to any such defensive measures.

Despite the fact that the Cayman Islands has had a longstanding relationship with the Financial Action Task Force ("FATF"), in June 2000 the FATF placed the Cayman Islands on its official blacklist of countries deemed to be non-cooperative in the international fight against money laundering. The FATF's decision was apparently based on its analysis that the Cayman Islands lacked specific legislation criminalizing a failure to report a suspicion of money laundering and that the various codes of conduct which were voluntarily adhered to by the various sectors of the financial industry in the Cayman Islands, were not mandatory. The Cayman Islands Government was quick to respond to this criticism and the Cayman Islands Proceeds of Criminal Conduct Law was amended and Regulations thereunder with Guidance Notes similar to those issued in the UK were adopted. These specifically make it an offence to fail to report a suspicion of money laundering and made the voluntary codes of conduct mandatory. In addition, provisions requiring the keeping of records and mandatory training for the staff of all entities conducting relevant financial business in the jurisdiction have also been introduced. On the basis of the implementation of the foregoing, the FATF removed the Cayman Islands from its blacklist at its June 2001 plenary session.

The unexpected experience with the FATF, while certainly a disappointment, demonstrated the commitment of the Cayman Islands to the elimination of harmful tax practices and also its responsiveness to the demands of the international community. For reasons such as these, structured finance business in the Cayman Islands has continued to increase and aside from the threat of developing onshore securitisation structures, no new threats loom on the horizon. Many offshore jurisdictions have not resolved their outstanding issues either with the OECD or the FATF (and in some cases both) although the threat of sanctions from the former is decreasing as it goes through the process of reformulating its approach.

In line with the increase in structured finance business in Cayman is the implementation of securitisation techniques in innovative new structures. Two deals were completed in 2001 which may have far-reaching consequences for the airfinance industry and the Cayman Islands too.

The 'Leonardo' transaction concluded between IntesaBci and Merrill Lynch broke new ground by securitising an entire aerospace portfolio by a US$1 billion publicly rated synthetic securitisation. The motivating factors behind Leonardo were for IntesaBci to obtain Balance Sheet capital relief, and to free-up credit lines in a cost efficient manner. BAE SYSTEMS PLC completed a transaction, ‘SYSTEMS 2001’, which used a Cayman SPV in a structure that enabled it to monetise lease cash flows and raise over US$2 billion in the US capital markets to refinance existing debt facilities with respect to its regional aircraft portfolio. Both deals are considered hugely successful both by the clients and the market in general and provide benchmarks for future public and private issues and financings. Looking ahead, the structures developed for both Leonardo and SYSTEMS 2001 should help to open up new lending capacity. SYSTEMS 2001 was more than four times oversubscribed with over 100 participants from both the United States and Europe. The huge success of these two transactions and the enormous demand shown in the SYSTEMS 2001 issue will presumably prompt others into looking at similar structures and techniques in aircraft finance. While the Leonardo funding vehicles were not located in the Cayman Islands there is no reason why similarly structured deals could not benefit from the use of Cayman-based SPV’s. The extent to which the Cayman Islands has proved to be flexible, innovative and responsive to international developments make it the preferred choice for these offshore SPV transactions.

Turning then to Enron and the vast amount of speculation raised over the use of Cayman SPV’s by corporations, the early commentary suggests that there is no need to panic. Enron’s alleged use of Cayman vehicles to hide large amounts of company debts has prompted considerable anxiety across numerous industries including the aircraft finance market.

Immediately after the Enron collapse, the Cayman Islands Government offered to co-operate with the United States authorities in their investigations. However to date, no formal request for assistance has been made of the Cayman Islands on the Enron matter. So what is the effect of Enron likely to be on the use of the Cayman Islands in these offshore financing structures?

The critical factor with Enron, which distinguishes it from other off balance sheet structures, seems to be that they were trying to transfer low quality assets to third-party SPV’s in order to take these assets off balance sheet. This has attracted regulatory scrutiny and is likely to be clamped down upon in the future. However, it does not appear to be the aim of regulators to challenge banks or financial institutions which have transferred assets to an SPV in a properly structured and legally documented securitisation transaction that can be supported by legal and accounting principles with opinions and where some level of risk is retained. There is nothing to suggest that the structured finance securitisation products currently in the market are at risk of being attacked by the regulatory bodies investigating the demise of Enron.

Fairly recently, the Cayman Islands Aircraft Registry opened itself to registering aircraft that do not operate in Cayman. However any aircraft to be registered on this basis must be placed in the "Private Category" defined in the Air Navigation (Overseas Territories) Order 2001 as having "any purpose other than public transport or aerial work" and this excludes any commercial aircraft used for "hire and reward". One way in which the Cayman register might be useful for the aircraft financing industry is where aircraft need to be put into warehousing facilities. Given the recent Sabena collapse and the serious reduction in air traffic generally, where airlines have been forced to ground aircraft, this might be a particularly important new role for the Cayman Islands following 9/11.

Over the past forty years the Cayman Islands has developed a strong reputation as the leading jurisdiction for offshore financial transactions. The fact that the Cayman Islands is among the eight largest financial centres in the world shows just how successful it has been in a relatively short period of time.

The increasing number of financial service providers setting up in Cayman is testament to its success and shows confidence that its dominant position in offshore financing structures is secure. Over the past few years the Cayman Islands been challenged by the OECD and FATF initiatives, the events of 9/11 and the consequent dampening effect they had on international business and more recently intense scrutiny focussed on the Cayman connection to the Enron collapse. In each case, the Cayman Islands has been quick to respond and react, whether it be with amendments to existing legislation, or offering assistance in international and federal investigations. This demonstration of responsiveness and flexibility combined with its solid legal and tax regime will further enhance the Cayman Islands already exemplary credentials as the premier jurisdiction for offshore structures.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions