Canada: M&A Transaction Or IPO: Why Not Pursue Both?

There may be legal advantages to a dual-track strategy in the current Canadian marketplace


Over the past year, as Canadian capital markets have regained their footing, Canadian private companies in search of greater liquidity have generally had a wider range of strategic alternatives to explore. One increasingly popular option is the "dual-track" or "parallel-track" IPO/M&A process, in which the company simultaneously pursues both an initial public offering and a negotiated or controlled auction sale process (or other specific sale process). Because market and economic conditions have not generally favoured dual-track processes in recent years, some boards and shareholders may find the concept relatively unfamiliar. The purpose of this article is to highlight, from a Canadian legal point of view, some of the potential benefits of pursuing a dual-track strategy for Canadian private issuers, Canadian portfolio companies of private equity groups and Canadian subsidiaries of multinational companies.

Factors to consider

Issuers considering a dual-track process must carefully compare the costs and benefits of pursuing such a strategy. They will need to consider and analyze not only the hard costs involved in completing a transaction (i.e. legal, accounting and professional advisors and related transaction expenses), but also the soft or opportunity costs of taking time from management and other key personnel of a business to participate in a transactional process that can be burdensome, complex and which realistically may not result in a transaction for the company.

Other significant considerations in a dual-track scenario are similar to those that are typically considered when making an "either-or" choice between an M&A sale process and an IPO:

  • Partial or total exit: One of the most important things to determine is whether the desired liquidity transaction would result in a total divesture of the business by shareholders (perhaps leaving no ongoing management role for the existing principals). The alternative is a partial sale or planned two-step sale transaction (whether in an IPO or an M&A context) under which the controlling shareholders will maintain a controlling equity position (or at least a significant minority position) in the company and some or all of the existing principals will remain an integral part of management of the business.
  • Liquidity issues: Another key consideration is whether the proposed exit strategy will produce instantaneous liquidity (total or partial) in the form of cash or freely tradable public company securities. In an M&A transaction, privately held illiquid securities can be exchanged for public company securities of the purchaser (freely tradable or restricted securities) or for securities of another private issuer (subject to resale restrictions). Similarly, a cash payment can either be subject to an escrow or holdback arrangement or fully paid at closing. In an IPO transaction, private issuer securities be sold for cash as part of a concurrent secondary offering, but the remaining securities can also remain subject to standstill or "lock up" arrangements or securities escrow provisions (whether imposed by stock exchanges, applicable securities laws or contractually by underwriters in accordance with market practice).
  • Indemnity profile of sellers: The indemnity or liability profile of an entity and its directors, officers and shareholders depends on the process involved: a controlled auction can differ significantly in this respect from a negotiated purchase and sale agreement and each of these scenarios in turn differs from a public offering (with respect to an underwriting agreement or as a result of statutory liability under prospectus or registration statement).
  • Time constraints: The time constraints applying to a sale process should be carefully compared to those that apply to an IPO. A fully marketed public offering typically takes 3 to 6 months to complete; a similar timetable would typically apply to a traditional controlled-auction process with customary regulatory approvals required to be obtained. Like a prospectus in a public offering, a sale process would typically utilize a comprehensive disclosure document on the issuer and its underlying business in the form of an offering memorandum. The timetable for a bilateral negotiated transaction could be significantly reduced without significant conditionality. In either case, the level of complexity increases (along with potential timing issues) to the extent that an IPO or M&A process involves multiple parties or multiple jurisdictions, including the existence of several regulatory authorities, different financial standards and overlapping legal regimes.
  • Completion risk: The variables impacting the completion risk of an IPO are very different from those that tend to affect a negotiated sale transaction with one or more prospective purchasers. In each case these variables must be carefully monitored.


These points illustrate one of the main challenges of a dual-track process, specifically that those participants involved in such a process will generally have to be willing to accept any of a very wide range of possible outcomes, particularly with respect to their ongoing participation in the entity. Of course, this somewhat naïvely supposes that a dual-track process is invariably carried out with the intention of securing the best deal, no matter which side of the IPO/M&A divide it comes from. Traditionally, that has not always been the case: the IPO announcement has often been used to force potential acquirors out of the woodwork with a view to encouraging a negotiated sale. However, over the past year, in a climate where the emphasis has been on finding investors of any description, some commentators have observed that the dual-track process is more frequently being employed with no preconceptions about the outcome.1

Advantages of a dual-track approach

Dual-track processes are well-known in Europe and the U.S., with particular prominence in certain industry sectors, such as technology, that have been forced by the weak economic climate to shift from what has traditionally been a more exclusive focus on IPOs.2 Where a dual IPO/M&A sale process is a practical alternative for a company in Canada seeking liquidity, the case for pursuing it is equally compelling here. Among the more significant underlying advantages are:

  • Greater transaction certainty: Pursuing a dual-track strategy provides greater transaction certainty in the event that an issuer is not able to access the capital markets in a timely manner, e.g. because of underwriters' objections or unanticipated delays arising from regulatory processes of stock exchanges or securities authorities;
  • Better pricing and multiples: Pursuing both paths will ideally create price tension that produces a more robust competitive process in terms of the pricing of securities in an IPO and/or enhancing negotiated multiples on the sale of a business - for example, where IPO investors are encouraged to pay a premium price because private equity has shown an interest in the company that suggests a possible future bid;
  • Lower valuation uncertainty: Academic studies have pointed to the reduction in valuation uncertainty resulting from IPO filings as a major reason for the higher acquisition premiums typically attained through dual-tracking, noting that private targets with higher valuation uncertainty, such as low-profitability companies in research-intensive industries, are traditionally among the major users of the dual-track process;3
  • Less impact on timetable: Moving forward simultaneously with an IPO and a sale process ensures alternative liquidity options without negatively impacting the transaction timetable in the event that one strategic alternative ceases to be available to an issuer;
  • Complementary strategy: The legal requirements of an IPO process and the preparation of a comprehensive disclosure document with the requisite financial information assists with, and can be complementary to, the M&A process. The two processes are not mutually exclusive. Due diligence investigations can also be streamlined without incurring additional transaction expenses;
  • Protection of stakeholders: Pursuing a parallel process allows the issuer flexibility in ensuring that the desired treatment for employees, customers, suppliers and other key stakeholders is achieved;
  • Efficiency: Being engaged in both processes imposes competitive and time discipline on the participants in each of an IPO and a M&A negotiated or controlled auction sale process; and
  • Flexibility for unexpected events: A dual-track approach gives issuers the flexibility to switch to another course of action should any of a range of unexpected extraordinary events occur (e.g. CEO termination, inability to obtain an auditor's report or to complete the requisite audited financial statements, deficiency in an expert report, inadequate funds to meet working capital requirements, etc.). Pursuing both an IPO and a sale process as part of an issuer's exit strategy ensures that fewer issuers will be subjected to unilateral determinations not to proceed with a transaction in the late stages of a controlled auction process by a prospective bidder or an IPO transaction by a financing syndicate member.


In addition, even in the "worst case" scenario - i.e. where the IPO does not go ahead and no buyer materializes - the IPO process may act as a profile-builder for the company, putting it on the radar of potential acquirors who may keep it in mind for further consideration when economic conditions have improved.

Minimizing cost duplication

While the cost of pursuing a dual-track strategy may at first instance appear to be "double", potential economies and efficiencies can be exploited to ensure that the increased incremental costs of a dual-track strategy are only marginally higher than a single-track strategy. For example, costs can be minimized for a dual-track strategy by

  • Retaining experienced transactional, financial, accounting and legal advisors to assist in leading the processes;
  • Using key dedicated and experienced personnel of the issuer to establish and manage the processes;
  • Creating, populating and maintaining a fully integrated and robust global electronic data site for completion of transactional due diligence by underwriters, lenders, prospective purchasers and their advisors; and
  • Cross-utilization of work product (e.g. disclosure documents) for both processes.


In all cases, the key to minimizing cost duplication lies in planning the process carefully in advance.

Situations in which a dual-track process may not be feasible

In many instances, it may turn out that one of the alternatives (IPO or an M&A sale process) is simply not available to an issuer as a result of:

  • The nature of the industry in which the issuer operates or the underlying business not being suitable to prospective purchasers or a capital markets transaction;
  • The jurisdiction in which the business operates being in a state of conflict or unrest;
  • The existence of past legal or regulatory compliance issues, or other similar extenuating circumstances, with respect to one or more key stakeholders;
  • The added burden of a dual-track process in situations where management is already preoccupied with other significant "core" business related issues;
  • Inadequate financial records or the risk of restatement of the financial statements of the business; or
  • Other significant risk factors such as expected changes in applicable law or accounting practices.


In addition, in most distress transaction scenarios, participation in an IPO process will generally not be available, yet in such scenarios the complexities of a M&A transaction can be significantly increased due to the involvement of a statutory bankruptcy and insolvency regime with court supervision of the sale process or as a result of the utilization of alternative less customary sale processes such as stalking horse bid processes or live auctions. Conversely, in a down market such as we experienced in 2008, earnings deterioration, lower multiples for certain targets and/or industries and limited or reduced credit availability made effecting a sale transaction on the desired commercial terms very challenging. Under such conditions, a poor response to an IPO could potentially deflate the enthusiasm (and offers) of potential acquirors.

Conclusion

Following the economic uncertainty in late 2008 and in early 2009, several multinational companies seeking liquidity utilized this strategy in Canada for their Canadian subsidiaries as part of the implementation of various strategic alternatives. At the end of the day, each issuer will need to consider its own unique objectives, together with the objectives of its key stakeholders, the environment in which its business operates and its ability to realistically pursue both avenues given its existing resources, management team, board of directors, the existing state of its business and other key situation-specific variables.4

Footnotes

1 See, e.g., Liam Vaughan, "'Dual track' IPOs return", The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2009, p. C5.

2 See Steve Schaefer, "Mergers Re-emerging", Forbes.com, January 5, 2010 and Amanda Lyle, "Keys to Success: Experts Offer Tips for All Stages of Partnering", BioWorld Today, October 14, 2008.

3 Qin Lian and Qiming Wang, "The Dual Tracking Puzzle: When IPO Plans Turn into Mergers", unpublished working paper (March 2007 version), pp. 5-6. In their study of a sample of 132 firms that withdrew IPOs in favour of acquisition by public bidders from 1984 to 2004, Lian and Wang found that the dual-tracking targets commanded a 58% acquisition premium over targets that did not dual-track. (p. 26)

4 I would like to acknowledge the contributions to this article by Andrew Cunningham of Stikeman Elliott LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions