Canada: Coal, Caribou and Consultation - Court Directs Accommodation in Treaty 8 Region

Copyright 2010, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law, March 2010

In its recent decision in West Moberly First Nations v. British Columbia (Chief Inspector of Mines) and First Coal Corporation, the B.C. Supreme Court (the Court) examined the meaning of the treaty right to hunt for caribou in the context of a proposed coal exploration program in the Treaty 8 area of northeastern B.C. The Court ordered a stay of provincial exploration permits for 90 days and ordered the Crown, in consultation with the West Moberly First Nations (West Moberly), to proceed expeditiously to put in place a reasonable, active plan for the protection and augmentation of a local caribou herd. The Court's basis for this remedy can be summed up in the following passage from its reasons:

"I conclude that a balancing of treaty rights of Native peoples within the rights of the public generally, including the development of resources for the benefit of the community as a whole, is not achieved if caribou herds in the affected territories are extirpated."

This decision adds to the evolving case law on the Crown's duty to consult and accommodate aboriginal and treaty rights, and illustrates what is "reasonable" accommodation. This case also squarely demonstrates how aboriginal law is influencing the shape of current environmental law, particularly the protection of species at risk.


In its judicial review application, West Moberly applied for a declaration of invalidity in respect of three exploration-related permits issued by the provincial government to First Coal Corporation (First Coal). These permits authorized First Coal to obtain bulk samples of coal, to conduct an advanced exploration program, and to clear trees to facilitate this exploration. West Moberly claimed that, in issuing these permits, the Crown failed to consult adequately and meaningfully concerning their Treaty 8 right to hunt caribou, and had failed to reasonably accommodate their hunting rights.

This litigation appears to have been preceded by the West Moberly asking the Province of British Columbia (the Province) to implement a rehabilitation plan for the Burnt Pine Herd of caribou, which is resident in the area of First Coal's mineral tenure, and which the West Moberly claim has been reduced to a population of 11. The Burnt Pine Herd form part of the Southern Mountain population of Woodland Caribou, which is a species listed as "threatened" under the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA).

All parties agreed that the Crown was required to consult West Moberly on the basis of its treaty right to hunt, but the parties diverged on the nature and scope of that right. Similarly, the parties advanced opposing submissions as to whether the Crown had adequately consulted and accommodated West Moberly's concerns, including whether a rehabilitation or recovery plan for the Burnt Pine Herd was necessary.

a) Nature of Treaty Right to Hunt

An important aspect of the Court's decision is how it defined the nature of the treaty right to hunt. In turn, this characterization of the right, together with the nature of the impact on it from the proposed exploration, is at the heart of the Court's conclusion that the Crown did not carry out consultation meaningfully and did not implement reasonable accommodation. Treaty No. 8, dated September 22, 1899, states, in part:

"... Her Majesty the Queen hereby agrees with the said Indians that they shall have right to pursue their usual vocations of hunting, trapping, and fishing throughout the tract surrendered as heretofore described, subject to such regulations as may from time to time be made by the Government of the country acting under the authority of Her Majesty, and saving and excepting such tracts as may be required or taken up from time to time for settlement, mining, lumbering, trading, or other purposes."

In interpreting this right, the Crown argued that the treaty right was a broad "right to hunt for meat" (not just caribou) across the First Nation's entire traditional territory, and was subject to the Crown's right to "take up" land for mining, as set out in the Treaty. Given the scope of this right and the expected impact, the Crown argued that its efforts to consult and accommodate were met, essentially because certain mitigation steps were developed by First Coal to avoid impact to the caribou herd and, more importantly, there were other caribou herds that could be hunted by the West Moberly. As such, the Crown contended that West Moberly's opportunity to hunt caribou in its traditional territory "will not be significantly reduced" by First Coal's activities.

The Court found that the West Moberly have a treatyprotected right to hunt caribou in the area impacted by First Coal's exploration activities. That area was part of West Moberly's traditional seasonal round, to which hunters travelled at certain times of the year. Given the Crown's concession that no recovery plan was in place for the caribou herd in that area, the Court held that the Crown had failed to reasonably accommodate West Moberly's concerns.

b) Accommodation Means Recovery of the Species

The West Moberly were concerned that the few remaining members of the Burnt Pine Herd not be impacted by First Coal's activities. Inherent in this concern was the historic decimation of the herd caused by past activity, including impacts related to the construction of the WAC Bennett and Peace Cannon Dams in the 1960s and 1970s. First Coal had submitted a Caribou Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (the Mitigation Plan) in response to concerns expressed by West Moberly in the consultation period prior to the permits being issued. Two government scientists commented on the Mitigation Plan, suggesting that while providing measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to the herd, the Mitigation Plan was inconsistent with the goal of maintaining or increasing caribou numbers and distribution.

The Court found that the Crown's failure to establish a plan for the protection and rehabilitation of the Burnt Pine Herd was a failure to reasonably accommodate the West Moberly hunting rights. While First Coal's Mitigation Plan was a step in the right direction of protecting caribou habitat, the Court was concerned with the lack of a rehabilitation program for the herd. In ordering the government to develop a caribou rehabilitation plan, the Court did not explicitly limit its remedy to the context of First Coal's permit applications. Such a general remedy, it could be argued, broadened the scope of accommodation beyond that of responding to First Coal's infringement of the First Nation's rights.

In ordering the Crown to develop a plan to not just protect but also augment the Burnt Pine Herd, it could be argued that the Court ordered the government to find a way to redress past infringement of West Moberly's hunting rights.

c) Cumulative Impacts

The Crown recognized the cumulative impacts of First Coal's project on West Moberly's traditional territory, but when asked by West Moberly to address this in the permit process, the Crown answered that this issue is "beyond the scope of this project to fully assess". The Court commented that such a statement by a Crown decision-maker – that it does not have the authority to assess the "taking up" of a treaty right – fails to uphold the Crown's honour. This leaves for another day the intriguing question of whether cumulative impacts assessment is now part and parcel of the Crown's duty to consult/accommodate.

d) Species at Risk Issues

The Court did not analyze the requirements of species at risk laws, why the recovery planning for the Southern Mountain population of the woodland caribou has not been completed, or determine the relevance, if any, of the statutory recovery planning process to the question of whether the Crown had properly accommodated West Moberly's hunting rights. Because of this, it is difficult to predict how significant the decision may be to future recovery planning.

SARA requires the federal government to carry out recovery planning for species listed as "endangered" or "threatened" under the Act. It also contains specific requirements for this recovery planning to be carried out in cooperation with affected First Nations. British Columbia does not have similar legislative requirements, but has signed on to the federal/provincial Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk. This Accord, while non-binding, indicates a commitment on the part of the Province to participate in species recovery actions.

Several recovery teams, consisting of representatives of federal and provincial governments, members of the scientific community and First Nations, have been working for a number of years to develop the recovery strategies for the various subpopulations of caribou listed under SARA. However, largely because of uncertainties in the science or understanding of all the causes of the woodland caribou's decline, the work has taken longer to complete than is required under SARA. Despite the lack of completion of formal recovery strategies under SARA, some plans for caribou recovery have been completed and are being implemented. One example is the Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan, which specifically impacts part of the Southern Mountain population. It does not, however, include the Burnt Pine herd.

West Moberly claimed that neither the federal nor provincial governments had lived up to their legal obligations under SARA and the Accord with respect to recovery planning for the Burnt Pine Herd. One troubling aspect of this argument is that recovery planning under SARA occurs at a population level. As such, even if the recovery strategy for the Southern Mountain population of the woodland caribou had been completed, it would not necessarily plan for or result in augmentation of this specific herd.

The Court's remedy of an order to plan recovery and augmentation of the Burnt Pine Herd may prove problematic, as it does not require co-ordination with the national development of recovery strategy for the Southern Mountain population of the woodland caribou under SARA, or the current plan being implemented by British Columbia for a portion of this particular population. It also fails to recognise the requirement under SARA for consultation with locally affected First Nations. Effectively, the Court has now imposed recovery planning requirements for one herd that may ultimately not be compatible with the recovery planning that is required under SARA for the species as a whole.

This decision also raises serious questions to whether the completion of recovery planning under SARA and provincial regimes will provide certainty to resource users as to how governments will regulate activities that potentially impact species at risk which are in traditional territories of the First Nations. Further, it raises serious questions as to whether the extensive First Nations' consultative processes written into SARA are sufficient to address the consultation duties of the Crown. At the very least, the decision raises the prospect that broad federal population-level recovery plans may not insulate provincial permit-holders from allegations that the permitted activity would impose unreasonable impacts on asserted aboriginal and treaty rights.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.