Canada: Delaware Chancery Court Upholds Shareholder Rights Plan With A 4.99% Trigger Designed To Protect NOLs

On February 26, 2010, the Delaware Court of Chancery upheld Selectica, Inc.'s adoption and use of its shareholder rights plan with a 4.99% trigger designed to protect Selectica's ability to use its significant net operating losses (NOLs) (Selectica, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc., C.A. No. 4241-VCN (Del. Ch. Feb 26, 2010)). The Court found that, in this instance, the protection of NOLs was an appropriate corporate policy, Selectica had reasonable grounds for believing that a danger to that corporate policy existed, Selectica's adoption and use of an NOL rights plan were reasonable and proportionate responses in relation to the threat posed and, therefore, the adoption and use of the rights plan were valid exercises of the Selectica board's business judgment.

Since becoming public in 2000, Selectica, a microcap enterprise software company, had failed to be profitable and had generated an estimated $160 million in NOLs for U.S. federal tax purposes. U.S. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limits the use of NOLs to reduce U.S. federal tax in periods following an "ownership change". Although a complex determination, an ownership change essentially occurs under Section 382 when greater than 50% of a company's stock ownership changes over a three-year period. Only shareholders owning 5% or more of a company's outstanding shares are considered in determining whether an ownership change has occurred for purposes of Section 382.

After receiving five unsolicited acquisition offers in July 2008, Selectica engaged an investment bank that approached potential acquirors. Trilogy, Inc., a Selectica competitor that had a "complicated and often adversarial" relationship with Selectica (which included patent infringement judgments and settlements in favor of Trilogy), also offered to purchase some or all of Selectica's business in July 2008, but Selectica's board rejected the offer. Trilogy made a second offer in October 2008 and was invited to participate in Selectica's sale process, but did not do so (Trilogy was apparently unwilling to sign a non-disclosure and standstill agreement). Trilogy began accumulating Selectica's shares and, on November 10, 2008, informed Selectica that it had purchased more than 5% of Selectica's shares.

Selectica's board met to consider the situation and review its NOLs and determined, with outside expert advice, that an acquisition of 10% of its shares in the near term by current and new 5% shareholders would materially limit Selectica's ability to benefit from its NOLs. As a result, the board, after consultation with its Delaware counsel and other advisors, amended its existing rights plan to lower the trigger from 15% to 4.99%. The amended rights plan grandfathered existing 5% or greater shareholders and allowed those shareholders to purchase an additional 0.5% of Selectica's shares. The board also established an "Independent Director Evaluation Committee" to periodically review the rights plan and the appropriate percentage trigger.

In December 2008, after Selectica refused to agree to Trilogy's various demands, Trilogy intentionally acquired additional Selectica shares and triggered the rights plan. Under the terms of the rights plan, the board had ten business days to determine whether to exempt Trilogy or exchange the rights for shares before the rights would automatically flip in. During this period, the board and the independent committee, in consultation with their advisors, discussed the situation on numerous occasions. After Trilogy repeatedly refused to agree to Selectica's request to enter into a standstill agreement, the independent committee determined to exchange the rights, other than the rights held by Trilogy, for new shares rather than to permit a flip-in and to adopt a "reloaded" NOL rights plan. The exchange diluted Trilogy's holdings from 6.7% to 3.3%. Trilogy is the first entity to intentionally trigger a Delaware corporation's rights plan with a modern flip-in trigger.

The Court reviewed the actions of Selectica's board and independent committee under the Unocal1 test, which provides that, in connection with the adoption of defensive measures, a board will be given the benefit of the business judgment rule if the board had reasonable grounds for believing that a danger to corporate policy existed. In making such a determination, the board must act in good faith and make a reasonable investigation. In addition, in order to satisfy the Unocal test, the defensive response must be reasonable in relation to the threat posed. Under Delaware law, a defensive response is unreasonable if it is either coercive or preclusive.

The Court found that even though "NOL value is inherently unknowable, ex ante, a board may properly conclude that the company's NOLs are worth protecting where it does so reasonably and in reliance upon expert advice", and, given the Selectica board's in-depth deliberations and reasonable and substantial reliance on outside expert advice, the board was reasonable in determining that Selectica's NOLs were worth preserving and that Trilogy's threats to the NOLs merited a defensive response.

In determining that the 5% trigger was not preclusive or coercive in relation to the threat posed, the Court noted that while a 5% trigger "has a substantial preclusive effect", the 5% trigger "must render a successful proxy consent a near impossibility or else utterly moot, given the specific facts at hand", in order to be considered preclusive. A preclusive response to a posed threat requires "the mathematical impossibility or realistic unattainability of a proxy contest". Despite Selectica having a staggered board and blank check preferred stock (in addition to the 4.99% NOL rights plan and other defensive measures in place), the Court found that the NOL rights plan did not constitute a preclusive defense mechanism.

The reasonableness of a board's response must be considered in relation to a specific threat. The Court determined that Trilogy's actions were a specific threat to the utility of Selectica's NOLs rather than being a general threat resulting from an inadvertent ownership change for purposes of Section 382. While Trilogy argued that the Selectica board's response should have been more narrowly tailored, the Court found that the board had no other plausible option, absent a standstill agreement (which Trilogy refused to sign), and that the use of an exchange mechanism, rather than a flip-in, was a more proportionate response because Trilogy experienced less dilution. Emphasizing a board's broad discretion in formulating a reasonable response, the Court stated that "the defensive response employed [must] be a proportionate response, not the most narrowly or precisely tailored one". In summarizing Delaware law, the Court noted:

'The board of directors is the defender of the metaphorical medieval corporate bastion and the protector of the corporation's shareholders. The fact that a defensive action must not be coercive or preclusive does not prevent a board from responding defensively before a bidder is at the corporate bastion's gate.' Likewise, once a siege has begun, the board is not constrained to repel the threat to just beyond the castle walls.

Noting that the 4.99% trigger is the result of an external standard based on U.S. federal tax laws rather than a standard created by the board, the Court found that the adoption and use of the NOL rights plan "were valid exercises of the [b]oard's business judgment".

The Court cautioned, however, that NOL rights plans "could provide a convenient pretext for perpetuating a board-preferred shareholder structure. For this reason, NOL rights plans, such as the ones adopted by Selectica, must be subject to careful review". The Court emphasized the Selectica board's considerable deliberations, analysis and use of outside experts. While Selectica's adoption and use of its NOL rights plan were upheld in the first review of an NOL rights plan by a Delaware court, companies considering adopting an NOL rights plan should be aware that any review by a Delaware court will be fact-specific and made on a case-by-case basis.


1. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (Del. 1985).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.