Canada: Court Grants Investors Leave To Pursue Remedies Under Ontario Securities Act And Certifies Class Action Against IMAX Corp.

Copyright 2009, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Securities Regulation/Class Actions, December 2009

On December 14, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concurrently released two decisions in Silver et al. v. IMAX Corp., certifying a class action law suit against IMAX Corp., and certain officers, as well as granting leave for the plaintiffs to pursue statutory remedies for misrepresentations made by the company under s. 138.3 of the Ontario Securities Act (the OSA). This is the first decision in Canada dealing with s. 138.3 or analogous sections found in other provincial Securities Acts, which create secondary market liability, including deemed reliance for corporate misrepresentations. Section 138 came into force on December 31, 2005.

Section 138 enables investors to bring an action for damages against issuers, directors, officers, influential persons and experts for misrepresentations (or failure to make timely disclosure) in secondary market disclosures. Once a misrepresentation is proven, liability is established, subject to certain statutory defences. Investors therefore do not have to establish that they relied upon the misrepresentation. (For greater detail on these provisions of the OSA and analogous provincial Securities Acts, please see previous Blakes Bulletins on Securities Law – November 2002, ( May 2003, ( February 2005, ( August 2005, ( December 2006, ( November 2007 ( and October 2008.) ( Given the scope of liability created by s. 138, it is expected that this will be the first of many decisions addressing how s. 138 will operate with respect to corporate misrepresentations and the rights of investors to recover damages under the OSA.


IMAX Corp. is a Canadian corporation with headquarters in Mississauga, Ontario and shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and NASDAQ. The plaintiffs, shareholders of IMAX, claimed the company misrepresented its revenue and compliance with GAAP in financial statements filed with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators, as well as in company press releases. IMAX later issued a press release indicating it was responding to an informal inquiry into its revenue recognition of certain theatre installation projects. Subsequently, IMAX restated its financial statements and acknowledged that the company had erred in recognizing certain revenue (and complying with GAAP) since a number of the installation projects had not, in fact, been completed at the time of filing the financial statements and issuing the original press releases.

The plaintiffs argued that the financial statements and press releases were misrepresentations that formed the basis for their claims under both the common law and the OSA. The plaintiffs claimed damages of C$200-million, plus an additional C$10-million for punitive damages, against the defendants for negligent and "reckless" misrepresentation, negligence and civil conspiracy. The plaintiffs also sought damages pursuant to s. 138.5 of the OSA.

At the hearing, the plaintiffs sought certification of a global class (Canadian and non-Canadian shareholders) against IMAX, its two chief executive officers and its chief financial officer for both common law and statutory claims relating to the misrepresentations. Additionally, the plaintiffs sought leave to pursue a claim under s. 138.3 of the OSA against the defendants, as well as IMAX's directors and Vice-President, Finance and Controller.


In order to obtain leave to pursue a s. 138 claim, the plaintiffs must prove two elements: the action is brought in "good faith" and has a "reasonable possibility of success" at trial in favour of the plaintiff. Since this was the first case under s. 138, Justice van Rensburg was tasked with determining how "high the court should set the bar for a prospective plaintiff" to establish the two elements.

Good Faith

The plaintiffs argued that the threshold for determining good faith should be low and actions should proceed unless they are clearly an abuse of process. The defendants argued for a more stringent test that would require the plaintiffs to establish their motives and that the case had "obvious merit". Further, the defendants argued good faith meant that the action had to be initiated for the benefit of the corporation and not for individual benefit.

Justice van Rensburg concluded there was no reason to impose a "high" or "substantial" onus on the plaintiffs to establish good faith, given the purpose behind s. 138, which was implemented to enforce corporate disclosure obligations and to provide a means of protecting shareholders from secondary market misrepresentations. It was held that good faith requires plaintiffs to establish that they are bringing the action in the "honest belief that they have an arguable claim", consistent with the purposes of s. 138 and not for an "oblique or collateral purpose".

The court found that the plaintiffs' objectives in pursuing the action met this threshold. Both had a personal financial interest in the action as they suffered losses when IMAX's share prices decreased, allegedly due to the misrepresentations. The plaintiffs asserted that another reason for commencing the action was to hold the defendants accountable for the misrepresentations. The court was thus satisfied that the plaintiffs had no ulterior motive for commencing the action.

Reasonable Possibility of Success

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs must establish a reasonable possibility of success on each of the required elements under s. 138.3 and that the plaintiffs must rebut the available statutory defences (reasonable investigation and expert reliance). Conversely, the plaintiffs argued that they simply had to demonstrate some evidence that supported the alleged misrepresentations and any examination of the statutory defences should be for the trial judge.

The court concluded the threshold on this element is "relatively low" and intended to prevent abuse of process and claims from proceeding that are based purely on speculation or suspicion. An evaluation of all the evidence is required, including in relation to statutory defences, to determine whether the plaintiffs have a reasonable possibility of success at trial.

In reviewing the evidence against each defendant individually, Justice van Rensburg concluded that the plaintiffs had a reasonable possibility of proving their claims against IMAX and the individual defendants, except two directors. Her Honour also found that some of the individual defendants were unlikely to succeed in the reasonable investigation defence by virtue of their participation in the accounting and knowledge of the status of the projects. The court reached a similar conclusion with respect to the expert reliance defence. These findings, however, will not be binding on the trial judge.

Accordingly, the court concluded that the plaintiffs had met the threshold outlined in s. 138.8 and granted leave to pursue the statutory action against IMAX and some of the individual defendants.


The plaintiffs sought class certification to pursue both common law and statutory claims for the misrepresentations. The defendants conceded that the OSA claims were suitable for certification. The main issues in the certification context were the scope of the common law claims to be certified and the identification of the class members.

The defendants sought to strike the claim for negligent misrepresentation on the basis that a corporation could not owe a duty of care to shareholders for pure economic loss given the potential for indeterminate liability. The defendants also argued that the plaintiffs failed to establish individual reliance on the misrepresentations. The court, however, certified all but one of the plaintiffs' claims. Even though the pleadings did not establish individual reliance, the court nevertheless concluded that the plaintiffs' claim disclosed a cause of action in negligent misrepresentation. Further, her Honour was not satisfied that policy reasons would preclude the plaintiffs from establishing that IMAX owed investors a duty of care.

In respect of defining the appropriate class, the plaintiffs sought to certify a global class that included Canadian and non-Canadian shareholders who held shares in IMAX on the TSX or NASDAQ during the class period. The defendants attacked this definition as overbroad since only 10-15% of IMAX's shareholders were Canadian residents. The defendants further argued against the proposed class on the grounds that a certification proceeding had also been initiated in the U.S. (no ruling had been made at the time of the hearing), and there was a possibility that a court would have to apply foreign laws because there were non- Canadian shareholders.

Notwithstanding the defendants' arguments, the court certified a global class due to the real and substantial connection between the plaintiffs' claims and Ontario. In doing so, the court noted that any issues with respect to the application of foreign laws could be addressed in the trial process by adjusting the common issues or recognizing sub-classes. The presence of a certification proceeding in the U.S. and the possibility of applying foreign laws were not sufficient to prevent the certification of a global class, despite the potential for added complexity. Further, the court found that the defendants' concerns regarding the potential class were not bona fide, but instead focused on limiting the size of the class and reducing potential liability.

Finally, the judge accepted that the class members' claims raised common issues, including those involving negligent misrepresentation and damages. In doing so, he rejected the defendants' argument that both issues required individual inquiries to determine reliance and whether the class members actually suffered any loss or damage.


The judge's findings with respect to the leave requirements under s. 138, as well as the global class certification, will likely be subject to an appeal. In the meantime, the threshold established in this case for advancing a claim under s. 138 for secondary market disclosures will not be onerous for investors to meet, which could increase liability concerns for corporations as well as their directors and officers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions