Canada: Leave Granted For Secondary Market Misrepresentations Claim, Class Of Worldwide Investors Certified

The new Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act (Act), which provides a statutory right of action against reporting issuers, their officers and directors, and other related parties for misrepresentations in secondary market disclosures, came into force on December 31, 2005. Since that time, numerous secondary market misrepresentation claims have been initiated in the Province. However, before a plaintiff may proceed with a claim under Part XXIII.1, he or she must first obtain leave of the court. Until now, no court had determined the issue of leave.

On December 14, 2009, Justice Van Rensburg's much anticipated decision with respect to the leave application in Silver v. IMAX was released. She determined that leave should be granted. Justice Van Rensburg also released companion reasons certifying a class action based on common law and statutory claims on behalf of a global class of IMAX investors.

As the first judicial interpretation of the test for leave and the first certification of a class advancing the new statutory cause of action, both decisions are groundbreaking and likely to arouse controversy. Justice Van Rensburg's interpretation of the test for leave suggests that it may not present a serious hurdle to plaintiffs seeking to bring a claim based on secondary market misrepresentations. Indeed, this first decision on the issue has set the bar quite low.

Similarly, the certification of a worldwide class of investors may make Ontario a jurisdiction of choice for future securities class action claims, even when a significant proportion of investors reside outside of the province or even outside of Canada. Although it is anticipated that appellate courts will weigh in on several aspects of the leave and certification decisions, we can expect the increase in securities class action litigation that was sparked by the enactment of Part XXIII.1 of the Act to continue.

Misrepresentations Alleged and Defences Raised

The proposed representative plaintiffs are Ontario residents who purchased IMAX shares over the TSX just days before the company issued a press release announcing that it was responding to an informal SEC inquiry regarding the timing of its revenue recognition. Following the press release, the value of IMAX shares dropped 40%.

The plaintiffs allege that IMAX and certain of its officers and directors improperly recognized revenue for sales and leases of IMAX theatre systems and thereby misrepresented the true state of the company's revenues in its 2005 annual financial results and certain press releases. Key evidence relied on by the plaintiffs in support of their claim was the fact that in 2007, IMAX restated its financial results for several years, including 2005, and subsequently acknowledged that there had been an error in revenue recognition.

The defendants rely on the "reasonable investigation" defence available under Part XXIII.1 of the Act. They assert that they conducted a reasonable investigation into IMAX's revenue recognition policies and practices. They also assert that they reasonably relied on the advice of IMAX's auditors about the company's recognition of revenue associated with sales and leases of IMAX theatre systems in its 2005 financial results.

The Leave Decision

Justice Van Rensburg granted leave for the plaintiffs' statutory claims to proceed against IMAX and all of the individual respondents, except two outside directors. In granting leave for the significant majority of the plaintiffs' claims, Justice Van Rensburg interpreted and applied the two elements of the statutory test for leave: (1) that the action is brought in good faith; and (2) that the plaintiffs have a reasonable possibility of success at trial. She set a low threshold for both elements.

To satisfy the good faith element of the test, Justice Van Rensburg stated that plaintiffs must establish

that they are bringing their action in the honest belief that they have an arguable claim, and for reasons that are consistent with the purpose of the statutory cause of action and not for an oblique or collateral purpose.

She found affidavit evidence that the plaintiffs had a personal financial interest in the outcome of the proceedings and that they had altruistic reasons for commencing the action (such as holding the respondents accountable for misrepresentations to the public and "sending a message" to other directors and officers) to be sufficient evidence of their good faith.

Justice Van Rensburg indicated that, in the absence of any prior interpretation of the leave test, her analysis would be informed by reference to the somewhat analogous leave requirement that must be met before a derivative action may be brought. However, she rejected the respondents' arguments that the "good faith" element of the leave test under Part XXIII.1 of the Act should be as high a threshold as it must in the derivative action context.

Justice Van Rensburg also found that the second branch of the leave test – whether the plaintiffs' claim has a reasonable possibility of success at trial – required a preliminary analysis of the merits of the case. In conducting this analysis, she determined that the court is required to evaluate and weigh the evidence at hand but that it must be mindful of the limitations of the application process.

She held that to satisfy the second branch of the test for leave, plaintiffs must "put forward the evidence they rely on as to the misrepresentation, and the extent of knowledge or participation required for non-core documents and liability for officers." In response, the respondents are permitted to adduce evidence of the statutory defences available to them under Part XXIII.1 of the Act.

While she commented on the evidence that the parties are required or permitted to adduce on the leave motion, Justice Van Rensburg did not articulate the evidentiary threshold that the plaintiffs are required to meet to show a reasonable possibility of success at trial. One may infer from the evidence to which she referred in support of her conclusion, however, that the evidentiary threshold for the second branch of the leave test is quite low. For example, Justice Van Rensburg concluded that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that there was a material misrepresentation in the company's annual filings and associated press releases based on the facts that the company had subsequently restated its financial statements and acknowledged that the original statements had not been compliant with GAAP. With regard to the director defendants, no further evidence was cited as a basis for the conclusion that there was a reasonable possibility that the statutory claims would be successful at trial (subject to any statutory defence they might advance).

With regard to the officer respondents (against whom there must be proof that they permitted, authorized or acquiesced in the release of the statement containing the misrepresentation), their roles as CFO and VP Finance, their involvement in the company's year-end accounting process, and the fact that they signed certain disclosures at issue, were found to constitute sufficient evidence to justify granting leave to pursue statutory claims against them.

In contrast to the low threshold which plaintiffs have to meet in order to show a reasonable possibility of success at trial at the leave stage, Justice Van Rensburg determined that, in order to defeat a leave motion, the respondents must meet a much higher evidentiary threshold. The court must "be satisfied that the evidence in support of such a defence at the preliminary merits stage will foreclose the plaintiffs' reasonable possibility of success at trial". Although all defendants put forward evidence of their reasonable investigation, only two outside directors who were not on the audit committee and who had a limited role in respect of the company's financial reporting succeeded in establishing that there was no reasonable possibility of success against them at trial.

The Certification Decision

Justice Van Rensburg certified a class action based on common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy as well as the statutory cause of action pursuant to Part XXIII.1 of the Act on behalf of a global class of IMAX investors. Two aspects of the certification decision are almost certain to prove controversial.

First, Justice Van Rensburg concluded that the plaintiffs' common law claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation raised common issues that were suitable for certification. She accepted that the reliance element of these torts had been satisfied by the plaintiffs' pleading that all class members relied on the misrepresentations and other misstatements "by the act of purchasing IMAX securities" based on an "efficient market theory." This aspect of the decision is likely to attract criticism because it does not follow authorities which hold that common law claims for negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation are inappropriate for certification.

Ontario courts have consistently held that individual investors asserting such claims must demonstrate that they relied on the representations and the issue of reliance requires individual determination. In most instances, the need to conduct individual hearings on the issue of reliance will make a class proceeding unmanageable. Indeed, many would argue that Part XXIII.1 of the Act was enacted precisely because of the practically insurmountable hurdle that the common law presents for the certification of misrepresentation claims. In other words, if common law claims for misrepresentation could be certified so easily, it would have been unnecessary for the Legislature to have enacted Part XXIII.1. Likewise, it would be unnecessary for investors to resort to it.

Second, Justice Van Rensburg certified a global class of IMAX investors. She acknowledged that global classes are unusual in Canadian law, noting that there are no reported Ontario appellate court decisions reviewing the certification of a global class. Nevertheless, she found that a global class should be certified on the basis that the conduct of the defendants had a real and substantial connection to Ontario. Amongst other connections to the Province, IMAX is a reporting issuer under the Ontario Securities Act whose shares trade on the TSX. Justice Van Rensburg concluded that the consideration of potential conflict of law issues raised by a global class, such as whether or not including the claims of foreign class members would have to be determined on the basis of foreign laws, was premature until the defendants plead the laws of other jurisdictions in their statement of defence.

Significance of the Decisions

While they are only the first of many decisions we can expect from Ontario courts (including our Courts of Appeal) interpreting the provisions of Part XXIII.1 of the Act, the decisions of Justice Van Rensburg in Silver v. IMAX may be expected to encourage the commencement of more securities class action litigation in the Province. In light of the low bar that has been set for the leave test, we can expect to see an increase in the number of actions filed pursuant to Part XXIII.1 of the Act. The certification of a global class of investors will no doubt add fuel to the fire. Interesting conflicts of laws issues will most certainly be raised in litigation to come when parallel proceedings on behalf of overlapping global classes in both Canada and the United States reach the resolution and enforcement stages.

Catherine Weiler is an associate in the Litigation Department in the firm's Toronto office. Andrea Laing is a partner in the Litigation Department of the firm's Toronto Office.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.