Canada: The CRTC Turns Down A New Wireless Entrant


The CRTC yesterday determined that Globalive Wireless Management ("Globalive") does not meet the Canadian ownership requirements set out in the Telecommunications Act. The public review of Globalive's ownership structure, as well as the Commission's outright denial of its eligibility, are novel aspects of this case, as is the inconsistency between the CRTC's and Industry Canada's determinations reached under identical rules. This has led to much intrigue in the press over whether the federal Cabinet, including the Minister of Industry, will exercise its legal right to intervene. In this Client Update, however, we avoid any prognostication in favour of a summary of the Commission's ruling.

The Commission found that Orascom Telecom Holdings ("Orascom"), an Egyptian owner of mobile ventures in several countries, has the ongoing ability to determine Globalive's strategic decision-making activities and that Globalive is therefore controlled in fact by Orascom. Accordingly, the Commission found that Globalive is not currently eligible to operate as a telecommunications common carrier.

Under the Telecommunications Act, in order for a telecommunications common carrier to be eligible to operate in Canada (as a "Canadian carrier") it must be a Canadian owned and controlled corporation. The criteria include both "black-letter" restrictions, addressing ownership of voting shares and board composition, as well as a more subjective test that the undertaking and other Canadian entities in the structure not be controlled by non-Canadians. Precedents indicate that control, which is defined broadly and includes the concept of "control in fact" or "effective control", is only established where influence is dominant or determining. In particular, the issue is whether non-Canadians have an ongoing power or ability, whether exercised or not, to dominate or determine the strategic decision- making activities of a corporation or to manage and run its day-to-day operations.

Globalive made significant changes to the legal arrangements among its shareholders in order to address concerns expressed by the CRTC and incumbent wireless operators. Ultimately, however, it was other factors, largely relating to the identity of Orascom as an operator and Globalive's capital structure, that, taken together, led the Commission to conclude that Globalive does not meet the test.

The Commission determined that significant concerns remain with respect to the control in fact of Globalive by Orascom, given that Orascom:

  • holds 65.1% of Globalive's equity;
  • is the principal source of technical expertise and has entered into a strategic technical arrangement with Globalive;
  • provides Globalive with access to an established wireless trademark, the "Wind" brand, under which Globalive will operate; and
  • holds the overwhelming majority (99%) of the outstanding debt.

The CRTC noted that it considers that each of the factors addressed in its decision provides Orascom with an avenue for influence over Globalive and that "[w]hile disparate points of influence may not individually result in control, when combined they can translate into the ability to control in fact."

The Commission's decision appears to turn largely on the level of debt held by Orascom in combination with its 65% equity interest, as evidenced by the following quote:

...such a significant concentration of debt in the hands of Orascom, representing the vast majority of Globalive's enterprise value, serves to provide Orascom with leverage over Globalive. Given Orascom's equity interest in Globalive, such a high level of debt in the hands of a non- Canadian is unacceptable.

Certain key elements of the Globalive decision are summarized below.


The combination of Orascom's voting and nonvoting shares translated into 65.1% of Globalive's total equity.

The Commission acknowledged that Orascom's equity participation of 65.1% is consistent with levels of non-Canadian investment previously approved by the Commission. The CRTC also noted that, while in the circumstances of this case the level of equity participation provides an avenue for influence, it is not sufficient on its own to convert that influence into control.


Orascom is the source of approximately 99% of Globalive's debt, for a total commitment of $508.4 million.

While the CRTC noted that there are no statutory restrictions on the amount of debt that a non- Canadian can provide to a telecommunications common carrier, where a company is heavily debt financed, the Commission noted that this can translate into significant influence over the venture by the debt holder.

The CRTC noted that the magnitude of the debt provided by Orascom, the relative debt to equity financing, and the fact that the debt is concentrated in the hands of a single entity all cause the Commission concern. Modifications to the covenants and terms of the loans volunteered by Globalive did little to reduce this concern. Furthermore, the CRTC noted that covenants similar to those deleted from the Orascom loan agreements are still contained in the veto rights in the Shareholders' Agreement.

In addition, the Commission considered that Globalive's dependence upon Orascom for financing may well increase in the near term, given its inability to date to attract substantial third-party financing. The Commission noted that a company's inability to obtain financing from third-party sources may also be relevant to the issue of control in fact. The Commission reiterated its finding in the Unitel decision that "In certain circumstances it may be possible to conclude that a non-Canadian shareholder or lender may have a considerable amount of leverage, and even control, over a cash-strapped telecommunications common carrier."


Notwithstanding the structure of the equity, the CRTC required that the nominees of the Canadian shareholder outnumber those of Orascom, in order to offset the influence of the latter. In order to address this point, Globalive would have to amend its board structure so that the Canadian shareholder nominates 5 directors, Orascom nominates 4 directors, and each nominate one Independent Director.


The Commission originally expressed concerns regarding the liquidity rights granted to Orascom as minority voting shareholder; in particular, the Commission felt that unilateral drag-along rights were inconsistent with the position of the Canadian shareholder as the majority voting shareholder. While Globalive amended the original liquidity rights to provide for a mutual right, the provision of a guaranteed floor price for the Canadian shareholder should it elect to sell within a certain period concerned the Commission. The CRTC found in the decision that the liquidity rights, even in their revised form, provide an indication of Orascom's influence over the venture, given that it is traditionally the minority voting shareholder which is granted an exit provision at a guaranteed price, not the controlling shareholder. It therefore held that the specification of a floor price and the imposition of a cap on the proceeds generated in the event that the Canadian shareholder sells its shares are inconsistent with the relative voting interests of the shareholders.

The Globalive agreements limit a sale of shares to an "Eligible Purchaser" (i.e., the purchaser cannot be a Strategic Competitor, defined as a person which operates or provides telecommunications business services, whether fixed line or wireless). Notwithstanding that all sale provisions are subject to extensive rights of first refusal in favour of the non-selling shareholder, the CRTC considered that the ability of the exiting investor to find a suitable purchaser is a significant issue with regard to liquidity. The Commission was concerned that the Eligible Purchaser definition limits the pool of potential purchasers to financial investors and restricts the ability of the majority voting shareholder to sell all or some of its shares. Accordingly, the Commission ruled that Globalive should amend the definition of Strategic Competitor to include only entities which, taken together with their affiliates, hold more than a 10% share of the Canadian wireless market on a persubscriber basis [the 10% limit is to accord with Industry Canada's requirement for the spectrum set aside for new entrants under which Globalive was licensed].


In response to CRTC and intervener concerns, Globalive increased the monetary thresholds of particular veto rights to 5% of the value of the spectrum it held, but the CRTC held that the value of the spectrum is not an appropriate foundation on which to base the 5% veto threshold. Accordingly, the CRTC held that monetary threshold for vetoes should be set at 5% of Globalive's enterprise value as determined by its board every 2 years, based on a third-party valuation.

Commercial Arrangements

The CRTC found that the Technical Services Agreement ("TSA") between Globalive and Orascom raises concerns with respect to control in fact as a result of the strategic nature of the services provided and the fact that they are provided by the major non-Canadian shareholder and primary lender to Globalive, Orascom. The Commission found that the TSA provides Globalive with benefits that operate as key determinants of its success and that it is this reliance by Globalive on Orascom that defines their relationship and allows Orascom the opportunity to influence a wide range of operating and strategic decisions. Given the significant benefits Globalive derives from the TSA, the Commission found that Globalive will maintain the TSA for the foreseeable future and that Orascom will continue to have influence over operating and strategic decisions related to Globalive's network.

Under the Trademark Agreement, Globalive is provided with a licence to use the WIND trademark in association with its services in Canada. The WIND trademark is used by Orascom affiliates in Greece and Italy. The CRTC found that Globalive's adoption and use of a trademark belonging to an Orascom affiliate provide Orascom (or its controlling shareholder) with influence over Globalive because Orascom has the power to limit how the brand can be used.


Many of the same arrangements that concerned the Commission in this decision, or similar arrangements, are present in the structures of other communications undertakings in Canada; however, as noted above, it was the cumulative effect of these arrangements that led to the Commission's decision in this instance.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions