Les dernières tendances en matière de résolution des conflits canadiens comprennent l’usage accru des technologies d’investigation informatique, la percée du financement des litiges par les bailleurs de fonds tiers et les tentatives de simplification du processus judiciaire visant à réduire les délais. Les avocats qui conseillent les entreprises et les institutions financières ayant des intérêts au Canada apprécieront les observations présentées par Sam Hosseini et Zev Smith, membres de Stikeman Elliott, dans cette publication rédigée à la manière d’une foire aux questions (en anglais seulement) appartenant à la série Practical Law de Thomson Reuters.

Une traduction de ce billet sera disponible prochainement.

Recent trends in Canadian dispute resolution include increased use of e-discovery technology, inroads by third party litigation funders and attempts to streamline court processes to reduce delays. Litigation counsel to businesses and financial institutions with interests in Canada will appreciate the insights of Stikeman Elliott’s Sam Hosseini and Zev Smith in this Q&A-style publication in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law series.

Topics discussed include:

  • Structure of Canada’s court system;
  • Stages of a court proceeding;
  • Class proceedings;
  • Limitation periods;
  • Third-party funding;
  • Summary judgments and injunctions;
  • Attachment orders;
  • Norwich and Anton Piller orders;
  • Law of evidence and documentary privilege;
  • Examination of witnesses and use of experts;
  • Appeals;
  • Rules relating to costs;
  • Alternative dispute resolution.

In the area of cross-border litigation, the article considers Canadian rules on choice of law and jurisdiction as well as enforcement of foreign judgments.

We are pleased to be able to make this 14-page publication available for downloading.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.