Canada: Pharma Industry Under Antitrust Scrutiny

Competition authorities continue to examine various aspects of the pharmaceutical industry. Most recently, the European Commission conducted surprise inspections of certain pharmaceutical companies, seeking evidence of anti-competitive conduct. One issue of concern is the impact on competition of "pay-for-delay" or "reverse payment" patent settlement agreements, whereby branded pharmaceutical manufacturers make payments to generic manufacturers in exchange for delaying their entry. Although this issue has yet to be a specific focus of concern in Canada, recent amendments to the Competition Act (to come into force in March 2010) could make it easier for Canada's Competition Bureau to follow the example of its counterparts in other jurisdictions.

United States

Leading the charge on this issue is the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), which has identified the elimination of "reverse payments" as "one of its highest priorities". In a June 2009 speech, Jon Leibowitz, the Chairman of the FTC, referred to reverse payments as "collusive deals" and estimated that the elimination of these payments could save American consumers U.S. $35 billion over ten years. The FTC also addressed the issue in its June 2009 interim report on "authorized generics", which deals with generic drugs sold by a brand pharmaceutical manufacturer. According to the FTC, its initial findings suggest that the prices of prescription drugs are lower when authorized generics are available. The report also suggests that agreements to delay introducing authorized and independent generics can harm consumers by delaying price competition between generic and branded pharmaceuticals.

The FTC has been joined in its stand against reverse payments by the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ"). In July 2009, at the request of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. DOJ filed a brief setting out its views on the legality of reverse payments under U.S. antitrust legislation. In its brief, the U.S. DOJ stated that in light of the "anticompetitive potential of reverse payments is sufficiently clear that such agreements should be treated as presumptively unlawful under Section 1 of the Sherman Act". However, the DOJ qualified its statement by noting that defendants may rebut this presumption by showing that the payments do not unduly restrain competition. The DOJ also declined to take a position in the underlying case (which involves a challenge by drug purchasers to a settlement between Bayer AG and Barr Pharmaceuticals to keep a generic version of the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin off the market). As a result, it remains to be seen whether the decision of the 2nd Circuit will be influenced by the DOJ's position, particularly given that the Court has previously taken a permissive approach to the legality of such settlements.

Consistent with the FTC's and DOJ's recently stated position regarding reverse payments, the Energy and Commerce subcommittee of the US House of Representatives endorsed legislation in June 2009 that would prohibit "pay-for-delay" patent settlements. The Senate Judiciary Committee is considering similar legislation. The push to introduce such legislation has not been without controversy – particularly in light of the differing decisions from U.S. courts on whether "pay-for-delay" settlements violate U.S. antitrust law.

European Union

The European Commission has been conducting an inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector for the past year. In November 2008, the Commission conducted "dawn raids" against a number of pharmaceutical companies. In July 2009, the Commission issued its final report and simultaneously announced the initiation of formal proceedings against Servier (a pharmaceutical manufacturer) and five generics manufacturers (Krka, Lupin, Matrix Laboratories Limited, Niche Generics and Teva) on suspicion of conduct contrary to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty. Among other things, the Commission alleges that Servier abused its dominant position by entering into "reverse payment" settlement agreements with the generics manufacturers in respect of its patented cardiovascular medicine.

The Commission's final report calculates that 3 billion EUR could have been saved between 2000-2007 if generic entry had occurred earlier. The report concludes that there are a number of factors which contribute to the delay of entry by generics including the patent filing strategies of the branded pharmaceutical companies, patent litigation and "pay for delay" settlements. The report recommends significant changes to the existing regulatory framework to improve access to generics, including the establishment of a unified specialized patent litigation system across the European Union and a EU community-wide patent.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the report also recommends that competition law scrutiny of the pharmaceutical sector be intensified in the European Union. On the issue of "reverse payment" settlements specifically, the report notes that the Commission will consider "focused monitoring...of those settlements with a potential to adversely affect European consumers" and that the Commission will initiate enforcement action in appropriate cases (such as the proceedings referred to above).

The Commission's efforts in this area remain ongoing. In a speech on September 29, 2009, the European Competition Commissioner stated that the Commission is "capitalising" on the pharmaceutical sector inquiry by bringing new cases and reiterated the importance of the Commission's efforts to "improve the functioning of this sector". In addition, the Commission confirmed on October 6, 2009 that it had conducted surprise inspections of certain pharmaceutical companies including manufacturers of brand name pharmaceuticals. The inspectors are said to have been looking for evidence of restrictive business practices and/or the abuse of a dominant market position.


The Canadian Competition Bureau has also recently examined aspects of the pharmaceutical industry in Canada. Specifically, the Bureau issued a report in 2008 on the state of generic drug competition in Canada. The Bureau suggested in this report that while there is active competition between generic manufacturers in Canada, the resulting costsavings have not been passed on to consumers. In the Bureau's view, the failure to pass on these cost savings is due to the structure of existing private and public drug plans and the manner in which these plans pay for generic drugs. The Bureau's suggestions for improvements in this area include the adoption of competitive tendering by provincial drug plans and the development of a network of preferred pharmacy providers for private drug plans (where individuals are encouraged to take their prescriptions to be filled at such providers).

"Reverse payment" settlements have yet to be the subject of scrutiny in Canada. However, upcoming amendments to the Competition Act could increase the likelihood of "reverse payments" becoming an issue. In particular, the new per se conspiracy offence, which comes into force in March 2010, may make it easier to prosecute reverse payment settlements in Canada as unlawful agreements between competitors because the Bureau will no longer be required to demonstrate an "undue lessening of competition" in a relevant market. Even if not caught by the per se offence, "reverse payment" settlements could potentially be challenged under a new civil provision to be enacted that authorizes the Bureau to seek remedies from the Competition Tribunal in respect of agreements between competitors that substantially prevent or lessen competition. In addition, given that the Bureau appears to have reinvigorated its enforcement efforts with respect to abuse of dominance (including joint dominance), it is possible that "reverse payment" settlements could be reviewed under the abuse of dominance provisions. With significant new administrative penalties of $10 million now available where an abuse of dominance allegation has been made out, the threat of such enforcement activity carries with it substantial financial risk.


The combined effect of the policy, legislative and enforcement initiatives described above is to heighten antitrust scrutiny of the global pharmaceutical industry. As a result, pharmaceutical companies should be sensitive to the fact that their conduct (particularly vis à vis their competitors) might attract interest from antitrust authorities, including in Canada.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Mark C. Katz
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.