Canada: Case Summary: Sky Solar (Canada) Ltd v Economical Mutual Insurance Company

A contractor (as the Named Insured) hired by a developer (added as an Additional Insured) but only with respect to “liability arising out of the operations of the Named Insured”. The Ontario Superior Court held that the contractor was not covered for a loss caused by the developer because it did not arise from the contractor’s operations.

Sky Solar (Canada) Ltd v Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 4165, per Cavanagh J.

Facts + Issues

The plaintiff, Sky Solar (Canada) Ltd. (Sky Solar) was a developer of solar energy projects. Sky Solar entered into two construction contracts with Marnoch Electrical Services Inc. as the contractor for Marnoch to build solar energy projects at two locations.

Pursuant to the construction contracts, Marnoch purchased a commercial general liability policy from the defendant Economical Mutual Insurance Company through Marnoch’s insurance broker, the defendant Firstbrook, Cassie & Anderson Limited (FCA). Sky Solar was named as an additional insured under the CGL policy specifying that the named insured was the contractor. The policy included an Additional Insured Endorsement stating that the insurance “applies to those stated as ‘Additional Insureds’, but only with respect to liability arising out of the operations of the Named Insured.”

Sky Solar specified the specific solar transformers that Marnoch was to install in the solar energy projects.  Marnoch supplied and installed those transformers.

Once the solar energy projects were complete, Sky Solar sold the projects to Firelight Solar Limited Partnership (“Firelight”). Several months after the sale, a fire ignited at one of the project locations was caused by the solar transformer and both projects were shut down for investigations and repairs.

Sky Solar was liable to Firelight for remediation costs and loss of income based on contractual warranties, so Sky Solar settled the warranty claims and voluntarily paid the settlement amount to Firelight. After Sky Solar settled the claims, it then notified Economical that it was making a claim for indemnity under the CGL policy.

Economical initially denied that Sky Solar was an Additional Insured under the CGL policy, and later, after accepting that Sky Solar was an Additional Insured, denied coverage for Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight under the Additional Insured Endorsement. Economical also denied coverage on the basis that Sky Solar had failed to comply with Condition no. 4 of the CGL policy, which prohibited the insured from assuming liability and settling a claim without Economical’s consent.

Sky Solar commenced an action against both Economical and FCA. As against Economical, Sky Solar sought a declaration that Sky Solar was covered as an Additional Insured under the CGL policy and indemnification for the amounts paid to Firelight. With respect to its action against FCA, Sky Solar claimed damages in negligence for FCA’s role as the insurance broker which issued certificates of insurance.

HELD: For the defendants, Economical and FCA; action dismissed.

Cavanagh J. held that Sky Solar failed to prove that its liability to Firelight arose out of Marnoch’s operations so as to fall within the initial grant of coverage under the Additional Insured Endorsement of the CGL policy.

  1. The scope of the Marnoch’s operations included ordering and installing the solar transformers, but it did not include the initial selection of the transformers to be used in the solar projects. 
     
  2. Sky Solar’s decision to use the specific transformers in the solar projects was not part of Marnoch’s operations, and Marnoch did not cause the fire by any negligent acts in carrying out its contractual duties of ordering and installing the transformers. The fact that “but for” the installation of transformers the fires would not have occurred satisfied the “but for” test but was insufficient to establish that Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight arose from Marnoch’s operations.

[78] The scope of the operations of Marnoch included ordering and installing the Marcus transformers. Marnoch’s operations did not include the initial selection of the Marcus transformers to be used at the Whybank and Manchester solar systems. After the first fire at Whybank, Mr. Ruffalo of Sky Solar made the decision to continue to use Marcus transformers. This decision was not part of Marnoch’s operations. The fact that the “but for” test of causation is satisfied because the Manchester fire would not have occurred but for the installation of the Marcus transformer is not, in itself, sufficient to establish that Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight is liability arising out of the operations of Marnoch.

[79] The failure of the Marcus transformer on March 14, 2013 when the Manchester fire occurred was not caused by any decision taken by Marnoch in the course of its operations or any failure by Marnoch to make a decision or take an action in the discharge of its contractual obligations. The event which gave rise to Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight resulting from the failure of the Marcus transformer at the Manchester location on March 14, 2013 was the decision taken by Mr. Ruffalo to continue to use the Marcus transformer at the Whybank and Manchester locations after the Whybank fire. Marnoch played no role in this decision, as Arbitrator Lax found.

[80] Marnoch simply ordered and installed the Marcus transformers in compliance with the directions given by Sky Solar and its contractual obligations. Marnoch did not engage in active conduct which caused the March 14, 2013 fire at Manchester, nor did it operate passively in a way which created this liability event. There is insufficient proximity between the decision taken by Sky Solar to continue to use the Marnoch transformer and the failure of the Marcus transformer on March 14, 2013, on one hand, and Marnoch’s operational actions to order and install the Marcus transformer, on the other hand, to allow me to conclude that Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight arose out of Marnoch’s operations.

[81] This case is closer to the end of the spectrum of proximity as illustrated by the Waterloo case. Marnoch, as additional insured under the Policy, is in an analogous position to that of the parade operator in Waterloo. In Waterloo, there was not sufficient proximity between the operation of the parade operator which organized the parade and train accident which gave rise to the City’s liability to bring this liability within the grant of coverage under the additional insured endorsement of the policy. Marnoch’s connection with the failure of the Marcus transformer and the fire at the Manchester location on March 14, 2013 was, using the words of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Vernon Vipers, “merely incidental”.

[82] In reaching this conclusion, I do not decide that it is necessary for the named insured to have been negligent in order for there to be coverage for an additional insured under an additional insured endorsement which has the language of the endorsement in this case. For example, to posit different facts, if Marnoch had contractually agreed with Sky Solar to undertake responsibility for the selection of a suitable transformer for the solar projects at the Whybank and Manchester locations and if, following the first fire, Marnoch had undertaken its own investigations, relied upon its own professional advisors, and decided to continue to use the Marcus transformers, which later failed, this would affect the analysis because, in such circumstances, there would be much closer proximity between the Marnoch’s operations and the event which gave rise to Sky Solar’s liability to Firelight. This proximity would exist even if, in this example, Marnoch had acted reasonably and without negligence in selecting the Marcus transformers in the first place and in deciding to continue to use the Marcus transformers after the first fire.

Cavanagh J. held that Sky Solar failed to comply with condition 4 of the CGL policy by admitting liability and settling with Firelight without Economical’s consent and before notifying Economical that it was making a claim under the policy. Sky Solar thereby forfeited its coverage, even if it had coverage under the Additional Insured Endorsement.

  1. While FCA had submitted a notice of loss to Economical on behalf of Marnoch, Sky Solar did not itself promptly notify Economical of the loss and inform Economical that it was making a claim under the policy.
     
  2. By settling with Firelight and paying Firelight without Economical’s consent, Sky Solar failed to comply with the clear wording of condition 4 of the policy which stated that the insured shall not “voluntarily make a payment, assume any obligation, or incur any expense, other than for first-aid, without our consent.”
     
  3. Economical did not lose its right to rely upon condition 4 of the policy by refusing to cover Sky Solar’s claim for indemnity coverage under the Additional Insured Endorsement.
     
  4. Sky Solar was not entitled to relief against forfeiture even if it had coverage under the policy:

[110]   In circumstances where Sky Solar settled and paid Firelight’s claim before giving notice to Economical of its claim for coverage under the Policy, I am unable to conclude that Sky Solar has proven that Economical would not have taken any different actions and that it would not have suffered prejudice from non-compliance with condition 4. Sky Solar has not shown that Economical clearly suffered no prejudice as a result of the settlement of Firelight’s claim. It is not necessary for me to decide whether relief from forfeiture is unavailable as a result of non-compliance with condition 4 because, on the facts of this case, I would not have granted relief to Sky Solar from forfeiture of coverage under the Policy.

Cavanaugh J. held that Economical did not breach the duty of good faith it owed Sky Solar as its insured.

  1. The fact that Economical initially refused to accept that Sky Solar was an Additional Insured for thirteen days did not rise to the level of bad faith conduct.
     
  2. Economical did not breach the duty of good faith by denying coverage to Sky Solar even though the Court in a recent decision (Great Atlantic & Pacific of Canada Ltd v Economical, 2013 ONSC 7200), involving a similar Additional Insured Endorsement, held the insurer liable for breaching its duty to defend.
     
  3. Economical did not breach its duty of good faith by failing to appoint an adjuster and investigate Sky Solar’s claim because by that time, Economical had knowledge of the loss and knew that it was Sky Solar that had selected which solar transformers to install.

Cavanagh J. held that FCA did not breach a duty of care owed to Sky Solar and was therefore not liable for damages in negligence.

  1. FCA had a duty to take reasonable steps to issue policy certificates (which it knew would be relied upon by Sky Solar) that contained accurate information, and FCA fulfilled that duty.
     
  2. Additionally, FCA did not breach a duty of good faith owed to Sky Solar.

COMMENTARY

On the first issue of determining coverage for the unnamed insured under the Additional Insured Endorsement of the CGL policy, the central question was whether the loss arose from the named insured’s operations. There must be proximity between the loss and the operations of the named insured to bring the additional insured within coverage.

Cavanagh J. specifically noted that the Additional Insured Endorsement would have provided coverage if the named insured contractor had been negligent and the Additional Insured was vicariously liable for the negligence of the Named Insured. Alternatively, there also would have been coverage if the liability of the Additional Insured, rather than being vicarious, arose separately from the liability of the named insured, but where the separate liability arose from the negligent acts or omissions of the named insured in the course of its operations that would fall within a risk which was insured against (see discussion at paras 70-72, 80).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
18 Nov 2019, Seminar, Calgary, Canada

Join lawyers from Field Law's Insurance Practice Group for a free seminar on topics including:

Do insurers have to provide advances to Plaintiffs and if so, how much? Why have the rules changed? Are there any benefits to providing advances? What can be done to minimize advances?

19 Nov 2019, Seminar, Edmonton, Canada

One year after Canada legalized cannabis for recreational use, this panel will discuss the implications in the workplace, society, and to our country overall. The panel will explore all angles of post-legalization and feature experts from workplace safety and standards, a producer, and a licensed retail store.

21 Nov 2019, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

Possession and use of cannabis has now been legal in Canada for one year and edibles became legal on October 17, 2019. What has the year looked like and what new considerations do edibles add to the mix?

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions