Canada: International Trade And Greenhouse Gas Regulations: Are Disputes In The Future Over Climate Change Legislation?

Last Updated: March 24 2010

By Peter Kirby, Fasken Martineau and Michael House, Perkins Coie

Originally published August 2009

Climate change and trade are inextricably linked. Increasingly, businesses will face cross-border differences in carbon regulation and related trade pressures.

Today, Canadian and U.S. legislators are pressing forward with policies that will regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). Policymakers are trying to achieve a regulatory framework that will have the desired impact on climate change, preserve the competitiveness of domestic industries, and manage any negative international trade implications.

These three goals may be difficult or impossible to reconcile. Several questions arise, specifically how regulations will impact international trade agreements, whether tariffs will become an issue and whether trade disputes could arise over these GHG agreements.

In addition to some of these more recent pushes for climate change legislation at the federal level in the U.S. and Canada, other regional groups have attempted to provide their own solutions both to climate change and international cooperation. Specifically, the seven western U.S. states and four Canadian provinces that make up the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) have offered a unique perspective on GHG regulation. Through a cross-border approach, the WCI seeks to find collaborative solutions to address climate change and implement a joint strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

This article seeks to answer some of the pressing questions facing the U.S., Canada and countries around the world on climate change legislation and trade, with the help of a WCI perspective.

How greenhouse gas regulation impacts international trade

Domestic GHG policies impose regulatory costs on industry. These costs may affect the competitiveness of an industry relative to imports from countries that don't impose similar costs on their producers.

While economists agree free trade makes everyone better off on average, the political reality is that domestic producers and unions spend a lot of political capital trying to limit imports that may not face the same costs. For many domestic manufacturers, the imposition of GHG costs provides a strong argument to "level the playing field" against imports.

And that is where many disputes arise – the line between making trade fair by leveling the playing field and imposing unfair costs on foreign producers almost always depends on one country's perspective. Governments may try to use various sorts of measures to do that, including tariff and non-tariff barriers, subsidies, and domestic tax policy.

Many of the same international trade agreements that limit governmental discretion to impose discriminatory trade barriers against goods from other countries will permit individual countries, in defined circumstances, to protect their environmental or health standards.

Health and environmental exceptions

While global free trade agreements including the North American Free Trade Agreement and those that fall under the World Trade Organization are expected to impose discipline on each country's trade policy, they don't eliminate each country's right to take action in areas such as the environment, health, or national security. Those actions can hurt trade.

The rulebook for international trade includes a number of exceptions and principles that have been built in over the years to preserve that balance. What is interesting about climate change regulation from a trade policy perspective is its often not clear whether it fits within these exceptions.

One prominent health example in the recent past: the U.S. prohibited the importation of toys and other products containing lead based materials, since they are illegal to produce in the U.S. and are deemed to present a safety hazard. In recent history, various countries have prohibited the importation of foreign meat or other food products in response to various health or food-poisoning scares.

Other exceptions, particularly those that aren't explicitly related to health, have failed however. One memorable example, this time in the area of environmental protection, occurred in the late nineties, when the U.S. imposed environmental restrictions on U.S. refiners of reformulated gasoline. At the same time, the U.S. also attempted to impose trade barriers on imported gasoline that it considered the equivalent of the domestic rules. Venezuela and Brazil brought a WTO complaint to challenge the imposition of these barriers and won: the U.S. trade barriers were found to be discriminatory and, therefore, prohibited. In this case, the trade barriers were not saved by the historical exception for health or environmental issues.

Therefore, a key question is whether a measure to curb various imports because of greenhouse gas, environmental issues or health concerns it is truly legitimate or directed to benefit a specific industry or industries.

In one as-of-yet unresolved example, the U.S. granted substantial renewable energy tax credits to domestic paper companies that reuse black liquor, a thick, dark combustible liquid generated in the production of paper. The tax credit benefits companies that combine "renewable" fuels (in this case, the black liquor) with fossil based fuels (in this case, diesel fuel). U.S. paper companies are able to qualify for this credit, thereby obtaining a major price advantage against Canadian producers. The Canadian producers, through the Canadian government, claim this tax credit is an unlawful U.S. subsidy under WTO rules and NAFTA. Despite the harm caused to Canadian producers, there are strong counterarguments to justify the incentive as part of a much larger, and generally-applied, domestic program to encourage renewable energy.

Measures by individual states and provinces

There are many climate change regulations proposed at the sub-national level, including by the members of the Western Climate Initiative, bringing rise to the question: "Could an individual state or province take measures to reduce GHG emissions within its borders if the effect discriminates against imports?"

The answer is not entirely clear, but there is a possibility that a disadvantaged domestic producer could seek its own domestic subsidy to combat another country's trade barrier and preserve its competitive position relative to producers in that other country. But as we have seen, certain domestic subsidies can run afoul of multi-lateral anti-subsidy agreements if the domestic subsidy is too specific to a particular industry.

The Waxman-Markey Bill (HR 2454), which passed the U.S. House of Representatives on June 26, potentially includes such a provision. The House version provides free emission allowances to industries that must compete with goods from foreign nations that do not similarly regulate GHG emissions. The effect in trade terms would be to relieve certain domestic industries from some of the costs of compliance with the U.S. GHG regulations.

It is not certain the Waxman-Markey provision would limit exemptions only as necessary to compensate for goods produced in countries without climate controls. Furthermore, the legislation's imposition of border measures after 2020, which would require importers to buy carbon permits for imports from countries unlikely to take action to fight climate change, could make the law vulnerable to a successful challenge at the World Trade Organization.

What about offsets?

Another common question that arises is whether countries could erect defensible trade to protect domestic offsets relative to imports.

In fact, it's possible a country could decide only to recognize domestic GHG reductions as offset credits, just as governments usually only grant tax credits for domestic investments. It could be argued that a refusal to recognize all foreign reductions as offsets (a complete prohibition on trading of non-domestic offsets) is more likely to survive international scrutiny than any hybrid scheme where some, but not all, foreign reductions are recognized. A country that prohibits all foreign trading in a commodity can rightly claim to be treating all foreign companies and all foreign countries alike.

And "trade" in offsets is really about mutual recognition of certification or verification agencies and standards between countries. The U.S. would have an interest in ensuring the integrity of any credits purchased by U.S. companies for domestic use. This implies that the U.S. would have to approve or accept a determination by a foreign agency regarding qualification of an offset credit. Since it would be impossible to have an international carbon market without an international agreement that addresses some of these trade issues, we expect many of these issues to be defined before 2012 and the replacement of the Kyoto Protocol.

Will trade disputes arise?

While it's impossible to say whether, or where, trade disputes might arise, one thing is always clear: domestic manufacturers will demand protection from any policy that gives importers an economic advantage.

On the other hand, U.S. or Canadian climate change measures that affect imported goods negatively will be closely scrutinized for compliance with U.S. or Canadian trade obligations. Unless climate change policy is neutral in terms of its trade impact, there will always be the possibility of disputes over implementation. That may explain why several groups argue that a simple carbon tax is a better option than a cap and trade program.

Clearly, trade laws and remedies available under multi-lateral trade agreements are not perfectly suited to address all situations that involve real barriers to trade. We have observed many instances in which governments have enacted measures that restrict trade but nevertheless prevailed when challenged.

Industry cannot rely on trade agreements and domestic trade law remedies alone to achieve a level playing field. It's important for industry to be vigilant and proactive in addressing protectionist proposals or broad policy measures that may have unintended trade impacts. In the end, forming an effective strategy early can help nip those threats in the bud and avoid the very difficult job of reversing damaging trade restrictions.

* * * * * * * * * *

Peter Kirby, a Montreal-based partner in Canadian law firm Fasken Martineau, is a member of the firm's International Trade-Dispute Resolution Practice Group, with a focus on cross-border disputes, trade and regulatory compliance issues, international commercial arbitration and investor-state arbitration. He can be reached at

Michael House is a Washington D.C.-based partner in law firm Perkins Coie's Business Group, where he focuses on international trade law. He advises and represents clients in all aspects of trade remedy investigations, and can be reached at

Allan Abravanel, a partner in Perkins Coie's Business Group; and Mark Sills, an international trade and investment partner at Fasken Martineau, contributed to this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.