Canada: Neither Too Little, Nor Too Late: A Delayed Jurisdictional Challenge Finds Success

Last Updated: August 19 2019
Article by The International Arbitration Blog, Raynell Hodge and Heather Maki

Most Read Contributor in Canada, August 2019

Introduction

Article 16 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the "Model Law") provides a means for early resolution of disputes over the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal. Pursuant to Article 16(3), if a preliminary ruling is made by the tribunal on the issue of jurisdiction, the respondent has 30 days to appeal against the ruling to the supervisory court. This begs the question, if a respondent fails to appeal in time and chooses not to participate in the arbitral proceedings, are they precluded from using a jurisdictional challenge to set aside the final award?

In the May 9, 2019 decision of Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v. Avant Garde Maritime Services (Pte) Ltd 2019] SGCA 33 ("RALL v. AGMS"), the Singapore Court of Appeal provided an answer and held that the preclusive effect of Article 16(3) of the Model Law does not extend to a respondent who does not participate in the arbitral proceedings and has not contributed to any wastage of costs or the incurring of any additional costs that could have been prevented by a timely application under Article 16(3). Thus, a non-participating party may still object to the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal at the "setting aside" stage. Moreover, such a party does not owe the other party any duty to participate especially when such participation may be inconsistent with their position that they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.

Background

Two Sri Lankan corporations, Avante Garde Maritime Services (Private) Ltd. ("AGMS") and Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd. ("RALL"), entered into an agreement to carry out projects under a master agreement ("Master Agreement"). The Master Agreement provided for Sri Lankan law to govern and for disputes to be settled by arbitration under the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ("SIAC"). Singapore was also to be the place of arbitration.

AGMS commenced arbitration proceedings against RALL on the basis that RALL breached the Master Agreement by failing to provide utmost assistance to AGMS. Although the Notice of Arbitration (the "NOA") was sent to RALL, and RALL sought multiple extensions, RALL did not file a response. The SIAC nominated an arbitrator on behalf of RALL, and appointed an arbitrator.

RALL subsequently sent a letter to the SIAC, advising that the parties had reached a settlement under a memorandum of understanding (the "MOU"). The MOU provided for AGMS to pay certain sums to RALL, for RALL to waive part of one of its claims against AGMS, and for each party to withdraw the arbitration. Accordingly, RALL informed the Tribunal that it was no longer necessary to proceed with the arbitration. However, AGMS subsequently sent a letter to the Tribunal stating that it was not in a position to withdraw the arbitration, and that AGMS was seeking an interim injunction preventing RALL from terminating the Master Agreement. RALL did not respond to AGMS' position, nor participate in the subsequent proceedings. The majority of the Tribunal issued an interim order (the "Interim Order") which stated that RALL had failed to ensure the continuity of the Master Agreement, which went to the root of the MOU, and the Tribunal concluded that the arbitration ought to proceed.

The Tribunal proceeded with the arbitration and issued a final award (the "Award") to AGMS, finding that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over the Master Agreement and that RALL had breached it. RALL commenced proceedings in the Singapore High Court to set aside the Award on the grounds that, inter alia, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The High Court dismissed RALL's application to set aside the Award, finding that the Interim Order was a ruling on jurisdiction and Article 16(3) of the Model Law required RALL to challenge the ruling on jurisdiction within 30 days. RALL's failure to challenge the Interim Order precluded RALL from bringing a jurisdictional challenge in subsequent setting-aside proceedings. RALL appealed to the Singapore Court of Appeal.

The Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal held that the Tribunal's Interim Order constituted a ruling on jurisdiction, engaging Article 16(3) of the Model Law.1 Although RALL did not formally object to the Tribunal's jurisdiction, RALL's letter to SIAC advising that the parties had reached a settlement was equivalent to objecting to the Tribunal's continued jurisdiction over the matter on the basis that there was no longer any dispute which the Tribunal could deal with.2

In the absence of a clear duty on the respondent to participate in the arbitration proceedings imposed by the Model Law, the Court could not conclude that a non-participating respondent should be bound by an award no matter the validity of their reasons for believing that the arbitration was wrongly undertaken. The preclusive effect of Article 16(3) of the Model Law does not extend to a respondent who does not participate in the arbitral proceedings and has not contributed to any wastage of costs or the incurring of any additional costs that could have been prevented by a timely application under Article 16(3).3 Any wastage of costs on the part of the claimant where the respondent chooses to abstain from arbitral proceedings would be self-induced.4 The respondent does not owe a duty to participate, especially when such participation may be inconsistent with their position that they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the tribunal.5

On the other hand, that position is different where the respondent fails in its jurisdictional objection and then participates in the arbitration. In doing so, the respondent would have contributed to the wastage of costs and it would be just to say that such a respondent cannot then bring a setting aside application on jurisdictional grounds outside the time limit prescribed in Article 16(3) (although they can continue to resist enforcement).6

The Court of Appeal further held that the intention of the parties when entering into the MOU was to effect an immediate settlement and thus resolve the dispute between the parties.7 Once the dispute was resolved, there was no longer a dispute which could arbitrated on and the Tribunal no longer had jurisdiction to conduct the arbitration proceedings. The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Award.

Commentary

If a respondent believes that the arbitral tribunal has no jurisdiction, they are entitled not to participate in those proceedings. While RALL v. AGMS establishes that such non-participation can preserve a respondent's ability to set aside the arbitral award on jurisdictional objections, this may be a risky course of action to pursue, as the respondent loses the opportunity to raise any substantive defences in the arbitration and defeat the claim on its merits. If the respondent loses its setting aside application, they cannot go back and raise substantive defences and their only judicial avenue to challenge the award is to resist its recognition and enforcement.

Where a respondent loses their preliminary jurisdictional challenge but does participate in the arbitral proceedings, the respondent may then:

  1. appeal the preliminary jurisdiction award within 30 days after having received notice of that ruling (Article 16(3)). If the court finds that the tribunal has jurisdiction, the respondent still has the chance to raise substantive defences during the arbitration;
  2. apply to set aside the arbitral award (Article 34). In this case, the preclusive effect of Article 16(3) will prevent the respondent from applying to set aside the award on jurisdictional grounds as the respondent will have contributed to wasted costs and potentially delayed the arbitration; and
  3. resist enforcement of the arbitral award (Article 36). The preclusive effect of Article 16(3) does not affect the respondent's rights to resist recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award.

RALL v. AGMS also clarifies how a respondent may raise a jurisdictional challenge as a preliminary issue. The Court of Appeal found that it was not necessary for RALL to file a formal objection; rather, the permissive language of Article 16 permits a tribunal to itself raise and decide issues of jurisdiction without waiting for a formal objection from one of the parties, thereby engaging Article 16(3).

Footnote

1 Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Pte) Ltd [2019] SGCA 33 at para 59 [RALL v AGMS].

2 RAAL v AGMS at para 57.

3 RALL v AGMS at para 77.

4 RALL v AGMS at para 75.

5 RALL v AGMS at para 77.

6 RALL v AGMS at para 75.

7 RALL v AGMS at paras 84 and 92.

To view the original article click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions