Canada: Alberta Court Of Appeal Extends Judicial Deference To Securities Commission

Last Updated: July 1 2009
Article by Mendy M. Chernos and Geoffrey A. Duckworth

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2018

Within a year of the Supreme Court of Canada's pronouncement, in the March 2008 New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir decision, that the "reasonableness simpliciter" and "patent unreasonableness" standards for appellate review of administrative decisions should be consolidated into a single "reasonableness" test, the Alberta Court of Appeal has provided strong indication that this consolidation means more deference to the Alberta Securities Commission's decisions when discharging its mandate to protect the investing public. In a series of decisions culminating with Alberta (Securities Commission) v. Lavallee, issued in February 2009, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that it will defer to the Commission not only on questions of fact and on questionsof law pertaining to securities law (its delegated area of expertise), but also on questions of evidence where procedural fairness is not in dispute. Corporations, directors, officers and promoters finding themselves before the Commission should heed these concluding words of the Court of Appeal in Lavallee: "A decision is only unreasonable if it is wholly unsupportedby the evidence" [emphasis added].

At issue in the Lavallee matter were provisions of the Securities Act (the Act) that require advisors and sellers of securities to be registered, and issuers of securities to file a prospectus, with the Commission. Certain exceptions to these requirements exist under Multilateral Instrument

45-103 Capital Raising Exemptions, if securities are sold only to "accredited investors," a defined term that includes persons whose net income exceeds a certain threshold (accreditation category (l)) or who own realizable assets exceeding $1 million (accreditation category (k)).

Lavallee was a director, founder and significant shareholder of KCP Innovative Services Inc. (KCP). Common shares of KCP were sold to more than one hundred persons for aggregate proceeds to KCP of $1.5 million. Lavallee had never registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 75 of the Act, and KCP had not filed a prospectus pursuant to Section 110 of the Act. The Commission staff alleged that Lavallee had participated in distributing KCP shares by soliciting trades despite not being registered. While this would have been permitted if allthose persons who purchased KCP shares were accredited investors, Commission staff said that some were not and that others did not qualify under the accreditation category (l), whichthey had been instructed to declare on their subscription forms.

The Commission found that although the common shares had been distributed to investors in purported reliance on an accredited investor exemption under Multilateral Instrument 45-103, some of the investors did not qualify for the accredited investor exemption, and that as such Lavallee had engaged in illegal trades and distributions contrary to Sections 75 and 110 of the Act. The Commission reached this conclusion despite the evidence being unclear as to whether Lavallee himself had instructed investors to misrepresent themselves as accredited investors, and despite the evidence of certain investors being somewhat inconsistent and uncertain.The Commission, instead, noted the failure of Lavallee to testify (and address any such inconsistencies and ambiguities), and based its findings on what it described as the aggregateof the evidence.

Lavallee appealed on two grounds. First, he submitted that the inconsistencies in the evidence rendered it insufficient to support his conviction. Second, he submitted that there could not have been an illegal distribution to an investor who was actually an accredited investor, albeit one falling into exemption category (k) rather than category (l), which had been indicated on the completed subscription form.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It commenced its review by observing, as it had in two of its 2008 decisions — Anderson, Re and Alberta (Securities Commission) v. Brost — that the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Dunsmuir supported the proposition that a "fresh standard of review analysis" was not necessary and that a plain reasonableness standard applied to both grounds of appeal.

Turning to the specific evidence, the Court of Appeal noted the Commission had not foundthat an illegal distribution had been made toany particular investor, but rather had found an illegal distribution based on all of the evidence. However, it did not discredit the Commission's approach, and this effectively overcame Lavallee's focused attacks on the sufficiency of the evidence in relation to particular investors. The result was that the decision turned on the evidence of all witnesses taken as a whole, even though in certain aspects the degree of Lavallee's personal involvement was unclear. Among the findings relied upon were that Lavallee had recruited a marketing officer who gave improper instructions to investors, that he arranged and attended road shows where improper instructions were given to investors, that he failed to take steps to ensure subscriptions went only to accredited investors, and that he was "more than a mere bystander or volunteer in the solicitation of investors."

McCarthy Tétrault Notes:

While the weakness of the direct evidence impugning illegal distributions having been made to specific investors may, at first blush, appear to be striking, it must be borne in mind that the number of persons involved in promoting the distributions was extremely small, and that the evidence of the affected investors was similar in general terms. Had there been a greater number of promoters and more contentious evidence about what had taken place, it might not have been open to the Court of Appeal to uphold liability on such a generalized standard.

It is fair to observe that it is not new law to apply a standard of reasonableness to the appellate review of findings of fact made by an administrative tribunal. However, the Court of Appeal's affirmation of the Commission's conviction in Lavallee despite various evidentiary uncertainties, together with its concluding language about unreasonableness existing only where a decision is "wholly unsupported" by the evidence, on the heels of its decision months earlier in Brost, suggests that the consolidated reasonableness test may translate into more, rather than less, judicial deference to administrative decisions — particularly in a public interest context, such as decisions of Securities Commissions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions