Canada: Because We Said So: Removing The CITT From The Review Of Canada's ‘National Security Exception'

Procurement Bulletin

Under the new regulation, an NSE is deemed to have been properly invoked when an assistant deputy minister declares it is proper. Fasken trade and procurement specialists tackle this circular reasoning and chart the about-face in Canada's position on 'national security' in procurement.

On June 12, 2019, the Government of Canada introduced amendments to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations. Described as a "clarification", the amendments were surprising, not only because of the absence of public notice or consultation, but also because of their apparent contradiction with recent, well-reasoned jurisprudence by a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel, and a body of well-developed decisions from the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT). These new regulations will significantly change the procurement dispute process that federal government suppliers have been able to access for several decades. It will be important to understand this impact when developing your strategy for bidding on government contracts.

The Amendments

The CITT is empowered to investigate complaints by potential suppliers that the federal government violated free trade agreement rules such as those found in the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA), WTO-AGP, the NAFTA or the agreement with Europe, when procuring goods or services, including construction services. Trade agreements provide that their signatories (i.e. governments) are not precluded from taking those actions considered necessary to protect essential security interests even if those actions violate trade agreement rules that apply to procurement. The federal government has developed a practice of invoking what it refers to as the "National Security Exception" (NSE) to exclude all of its obligations under all trade agreements. In 2012, the government provided notice that it was planning to significantly expand the application of the NSE – including its application to all procurements conducted by Shared Services Canada. When invoking this "blanket" NSE in its procurements, the government had not explained which rules of the trade agreements were being set aside; rather, the approach was to set aside all trade agreements and their rules.

This government practice has been extensively litigated before the CITT in recent years and a robust body of CITT case law quickly developed, providing rules on when and how the government should invoke the NSE.

Under the new regulations, an NSE is deemed to have been properly invoked when an assistant deputy minister (or a person of equivalent rank) of the department responsible for awarding the contract has signed a letter approving the invocation of the NSE, prior to the date of contract award.

The amendments require no government justification for the NSE invocation, including why removing the authority of the CITT to review a procurement is necessary to protect national security. The invocation of an NSE is now considered proper if the paperwork pre-dates the contract award. Government practice prior to the new regulations was to provide notice of the NSE invocation within the procurement documents; however, the regulations have not included this requirement as part of a proper invocation.

The regulation amendments remove the discretion and oust the jurisdiction of the CITT to investigate procurement complaints by suppliers. The CITT must now dismiss any complaint where an NSE has been "properly invoked" for a procurement – whether the government is buying pencils, printers or planes. Not surprisingly, these amendments stand in stark contrast to recent WTO jurisprudence, Canada's position when litigating this issue before the WTO, and clear and consistent CITT jurisprudence.

While the Government claims that the amendments are needed to bring clarity to this issue, the impact of this change seems a far cry from a simple "clarification".

Recent WTO Jurisprudence

On April 5, 2019, the WTO issued a landmark ruling in Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit, regarding the decision by Russia to invoke the "essential security interests" exception found in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (which is the same exception that applies to procurement rules under the various trade agreements Canada has signed) to prevent Ukraine from trading with neighbouring states. Russia claimed that sovereign States had the sole discretion to "self-judge" what actions they considered necessary for the protection of their essential security interests and that this decision was immune from scrutiny by the WTO. This position was supported by the United States but opposed by Canada. In its opposition, Canada claimed that while governments should be given a high level of deference regarding national security matters, they must provide reasons why their good faith belief that valid security interests existed and necessitated the overruling of trade agreements for the measures taken to protect these essential interests.

The WTO ruled that countries seeking to invoke an NSE had a duty to (i) demonstrate that valid security concerns existed which warranted the invocation of an NSE and, (ii) that the measures that were taken were necessary to protect these essential or national security interests. The NSE did not grant an unfettered licence to ignore the obligations under the trade agreements, or enable countries to shield themselves from WTO scrutiny. Importantly, the WTO said that if governments attempted to escape their trade obligations by re-labelling trade interests as "essential security interests", this would be "entirely contrary to the security and predictability of the multilateral trading system."

Recent CITT Jurisprudence

The WTO decision is consistent with recent CITT decisions, which have set out rules regarding when and how the federal government can invoke an NSE to exempt itself from complying with its trade agreement obligations.

For example, in 2017, in Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Co v Shared Services Canada, the CITT reviewed (and rejected) the government's invocation of a blanket NSE issued in 2012; holding that a government institution wanting to invoke a NSE had a duty to "articulate in a concrete manner, a national security issue that is rationally connected to the exclusion of a trade discipline." Only then could the government properly exclude the CITT from examining whether a federal procurement complied with the trade obligations targeted by the NSE. The government had to identify which trade agreement rules it was excluding from a procurement and why it was necessary to do so for national security reasons.

The CITT cautioned that resorting to "omnibus" NSEs to forestall review of government action undermines public confidence in the integrity of the procurement process. For this reason, the CITT urged that "government institutions limit the NSE only to the extent necessary to protect the national security interest" and that government institutions should "exclude only specific provisions of the trade agreements that cannot be upheld without compromising national security."

Conclusion

The Regulatory Assessment and Impact Statement (RIAS) provided with the new regulations did not explain how Canada has reconciled these amendments to the CITT regulations with its WTO obligations and international legal jurisprudence; however, these amendments will have a serious impact on how Canada conducts public procurements. The federal and provincial courts remain a venue for suppliers regarding claims of unfairness by the Government in the tendering process. And countries can still challenge Canada before the WTO for improperly invoking the NSE. For federal government suppliers, it is now even more critical that they have in place a robust and comprehensive approach to government procurements that is implemented well in advance of the release of a tender document.

Regardless of how this regulatory change reconciles with national and international trade agreements and jurisprudence, knowing how the procurement system works and how to best advocate for your interests is a crucial and integral part of any successful procurement strategy. Working with a legal team that has knowledge and experience in all of these areas, and that can provide strategic advice in all areas - government relations, trade law, procurement and disputes/litigation - and that can assist with strategic planning and approach from start to finish, is critical to success.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions