Canada: Nortel Quebec Class Counsel Fees Slashed By Quebec Superior Court

Last Updated: June 17 2009
Article by Laurent Nahmiash and Pascale Dionne-Bourassa

On Thursday, May 28, 2009, the Superior Court of the District of Montréal rendered a significant decision in the matters of Association de protection des épargnants et investisseurs du Québec (APEIQ) and André Dussault v. Corporation Nortel Networks, Belleau Lapointe S.A. and Unterberg, Labelle, Lebeau SENC, Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Plan Trust Fund and Fonds d'aide aux recours collectifs ("Nortel I") as well as in Clifford W. Skarstedt v. Corporation Nortel Networks, Ontario Teacher's Pension Plan Board, Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment and Fonds d'aide au recours collectifs ("Nortel II").  This judgment addresses the criteria for assessing and approving Class Counsel fees in the context of a class action settlement.

Class actions had also been instituted against Nortel in the United States, in Ontario and in British Columbia.  The recourses instituted in the United States were consolidated and Lead Plaintiffs were designated.  The proceedings in the United States progressed more rapidly than those instituted in Canada for various reasons.  On February 8, 2006, a historic and global settlement of $2.2 billion was announced. 

In the fall of 2006, the settlement was approved by the applicable courts in the United States, Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec.  Class Counsel filed applications in each of their respective jurisdictions, for the approval of their fees from the Global Settlement Fund. Quebec Class Counsel's Fee Application in Nortel I initially totalled $5.1 million plus disbursements, while Nortel II Class Counsel requested approval for a fee payment totalling $4.8 million.  These sums were to be paid both in cash and with settlement shares in Nortel.

The Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Plan Trust Fund and the Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment, the Lead Plaintiffs in the Nortel I and Nortel II actions instituted in the United States, were authorized by the Quebec Superior Court to intervene in the Quebec proceedings in order to contest the fees claimed by Quebec Class Counsel, given their interest in the global settlement fund, from which all class counsel fees were to be paid.

Class Counsel in Nortel I and II were ordered to file their time dockets following a failed appeal based on the solicitor-client privilege.  Class Counsel in Nortel II provided estimates of its time charges since it maintained no recorded dockets.

The hearing of the fee applications took place on September 4, 2008.  At the hearing, Class Counsels' fee requests were automatically reduced to CDN$3,491,000 for Nortel I and to CDN$3,207,886 for Nortel II, given the drop in price of Nortel Shares.

2. The Judgment

The Superior Court arrived at the following conclusions:

a) The principles 

  • Quebec Courts have the discretionary power to determine the fees and costs claimed by Class Counsel and to approve any agreement on such fees and costs.  When exercising this discretion, the Superior Court must determine the reasonableness of the fees and costs sought by Class Counsel.
  • Contingency fee agreements ranging from 15% to 25% have often been recognized in Québec, subject to the reasonableness of the applicable percentage.  Such contingency fee agreements are justifiable given the risks assumed by counsel.  Such arrangements also promote access to justice.
  • Contingency fees can be paid with the sums awarded to class members or from a global settlement fund.  However, such contingency fee contracts have no binding effect on third parties, including the class defendant, unless the latter consents to it in the context of a settlement.  The courts are not bound by such contingency fee arrangements, even if consented to by the defendant.  The courts must still examine whether such fee agreements are just and reasonable.  They should however be flexible in such cases and consider these agreements seriously since they reflect the will of the parties to a class action.
  • If no such fee agreement has been entered into or if the fees sought by Class Counsel differ from those set forth in a contingency contract, the Court must verify if the remuneration is reasonable based on the circumstances of the case.
  • In all cases, the Court must examine the proportionality of the fees sought based on the importance of the matter and the usefulness of services rendered.  The courts will also consider the experience of Class Counsel, the difficulty of the issues, the quality of the services rendered and the results obtained.  This global approach enables the courts to assess the importance and value of the services provided.
  • The use of a multiplier (or loadstar) method can be a useful indicator in verifying or corroborating the results obtained following an analysis of the criteria identified above.

b) Application to the facts

The Court set aside the Contingency Fee Agreements of 25% and 20% entered into by the representative Plaintiffs and Class Counsel in the Nortel I and Nortel II actions.  The Court held that Quebec Class Counsel had waived their rights to invoke these contingency fee agreements when they had instead agreed, in the Settlement Stipulation, to limit their fee applications to a maximum of 0.45% of the Global Settlement Fund.

i) Nortel I

The total hours worked by Class Counsel represented an investment of CDN$881,135.75.  Class Counsel in Nortel I requested total fees of CDN$3,491,001 at the hearing, which equated to roughly four times the recorded hours docketed by Class Counsel.  The Intervenors argued this sum was unreasonable

The Court expressly ruled that the fees sought by Class Counsel in Nortel I were exaggerated.  It awarded total fees of CDN$1,750,000 to Nortel I Class Counsel, which reflected a multiplier of 2.  The Court arrived at this sum based on the following considerations:

  • the very limited activity in the file from 2001 to 2006;
  • the fact that the certification motion had not yet been heard when the settlement was reached in principle in the U.S.;
  • Class Counsel's lack of participation in the mediation and negotiations leading to the February 8, 2006 settlement announcement;
  • the fact that Quebec class members were already part of the Global Class certified in the U.S. proceedings;
  • Class Counsel nevertheless hired experts and reviewed the merits of the Settlement Agreement and ensured its conformity with Quebec law;
  • the considerable risks taken by Class Counsel at the outset of the proceedings;
  • the complexity of the legal issues;
  • the risk that Nortel would be unable to pay any judgment;
  • Class Counsel's participation in the approval process in Quebec and translation of proceedings; and
  • the fact that an estimated $101 million of the Global Settlement Fund was destined for Quebec class members.

ii) Nortel II

Class Counsel estimated having worked a total of 2,390 hours.  These total hours represented an investment of CDN$885,970.  Nevertheless, Class Counsel requested a fee of CDN$3,207,886, roughly four times their investment.

The Court awarded CDN$1,250,000 which represents a multiplier of 1.41, based on the following factors:

  • the total time estimated by Class Counsel was abnormally high given the Nortel II proceedings only started in 2005;
  • it noted the Intervenors' contention that class counsel's omission to record contemporaneous time dockets deprived class members of the means to assess the nature and value of these services and negatively affected the quality of the evidence adduced on this important issue;
  • hence, the Intervenors' proposal to reduce these estimated hours by 25% before applying any multiplier was reasonable in the circumstances;
  • numerous hours were spent preparing the Fee Application and contesting the Intervenors' right to make submissions on this Application.  The class members derived no benefit from this work;
  • proceedings were already underway in the U.S. and Ontario when the Nortel II class action petition was filed in Quebec.  While a risk existed for Class Counsel in Nortel II, it was attenuated by this fact.  The Court also invoked the other considerations listed above in respect of Class Counsel in Nortel I.

The decision is subject to a possible appeal. If maintained, the case sets an important precedent for assessing Quebec class actions which mirror and piggy back on prior or parallel U.S. endeavours. The Intervenors were successfully represented by Laurent Nahmiash and Pascale Dionne-Bourassa of Fraser Milner Casgrain's Montréal office. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.