Canada: SPECIAL DOUBLE ISSUE: Dismissal Of Abusive Proceeding Upheld; Home Buyer Who Got More Land Than He Bargained For Not Entitled To Damages For Lost Secondary Transactions

Last Updated: April 15 2019
Article by Stephen Thiele

Dismissal under r. 2.1.01 upheld

In the first case, Nikou v. Karageorgos1, Gavin Tighe, partner and certified specialist in civil litigation, and Jonathan Nehmetallah, litigation associate, succeeded in upholding a lower court ruling which dismissed actions against, among others, lawyers on the grounds that the actions were frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process under r. 2.1.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

(i) Facts

The plaintiff in this case had commenced actions in 2012 and 2015 in connection with a family dispute that had seen the plaintiff and his siblings cut out of his grandfather's Will. The 2012 and 2015 actions were ultimately dismissed and discontinued respectively.

In 2017, the plaintiff started three new actions against family members and a number of lawyers who acted in the 2012 and 2015 actions and who were involved in transactions related to his grandfather's and grandmother's estates. In the three new actions, the plaintiff claimed damages for harassment and defamation. Those actions were dismissed by a judge last spring under r. 2.1.01. In dismissing the actions, the judge refused to permit the plaintiff to amend his pleadings.

The plaintiff appealed the dismissals on the grounds that the judge failed to find that the proceedings were frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process, failed to give reasons why the pleadings could not be amended, and erred in dismissing the actions because the harassment and defamation claims were supported by the pleadings.

(ii) Findings of the Court

The appellate court found that while the motion judge did not describe the actions as frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process, it was evident that the actions had been dismissed for this reason. The judge had notified the plaintiff that the court was considering a dismissal of the actions on the grounds that they were frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of process, and found that the pleadings did not support the cause of actions identified therein.

A claim that lacks legal basis or legal merit is frivolous. A claim instituted without a reasonable ground is vexatious.

Similarly, the decision to dismiss the claims without giving the plaintiff an opportunity to amend his pleadings was justified because it would be pointless to permit amendments to pleadings that did not have legal merit or that could not sustain a cognizable cause of action.

Even read generously, the Court of Appeal noted that the pleadings did not sufficiently express the gravamen of cognizable causes of action.

The three new actions represented an attempt to re-open the 2012 and 2015 actions. This was an abuse of process. Accordingly, the motion judge committed no error in dismissing the harassment and defamation claims since those allegations related to the pleadings and evidence given in the 2012 and 2015 actions.

Damages significantly limited in land purchase

In the second case, Bielanski v. Mundenchira2, James Cook and Scott Gfeller, litigation partners at Gardiner Roberts LLP, were successful in limiting a lawyer's exposure to damages in a residential real estate transaction where his clients got more land than what they had bargained for. The most significant aspects of this decision were the court's refusal to admit the plaintiffs' expert evidence and to grant damages for the plaintiffs' alleged loss of opportunity to invest in other properties. Rather than applying the principles in Toronto Industrial Leaseholds Ltd. v. Posesorski3, the court applied the principles in Kienzle v. Stringer4.

(i) Facts

In 2005, the plaintiffs entered into an agreement to buy a residential property in Mississauga (the "2005 Property"). The 2005 Property formed part of a larger property that was supposed to be subdivided into two separate lots. However, on the closing of the transaction the entire property, or both lots, were mistakenly transferred to the plaintiffs.

Both the plaintiffs' lawyer and the seller's lawyer had failed to notice an error in the legal description to the deed of the 2005 Property that was ultimately registered on title.

Three years later, the plaintiffs bought another residential property and in 2009 decided to sell the 2005 Property. While the maximum appraisal for the 2005 Property was $920,000, the plaintiffs listed the 2005 Property for sale for $1.125 million.

The 2005 Property did not sell until 2011.

The plaintiffs argued that the inability to sell the 2005 Property until 2011 was the result of their real estate lawyer's negligent failure to notice the error in the deed's title description. The misdescription caused the 2005 Property to be viewed by property tax assessors as being a 100 foot wide lot rather than a 50 foot wide lot and thus a higher property tax value was attributed to the 2005 Property than otherwise should have been attributed to it. The plaintiffs contended that, in turn, potential buyers were dissuaded from making offers on the 2005 Property due to the higher than normal property taxes for a 50 foot wide lot.

The plaintiffs further argued, among other things, that their inability to sell the 2005 Property until 2011 as a result of the title error caused them to lose the opportunity to buy investment properties.

In contrast, the lawyer argued that the plaintiffs' alleged losses were not reasonably foreseeable and that the plaintiffs knew about the error in the 2005 Property's title description as far back as 2005. Accordingly, the error could have been rectified years before the plaintiffs listed the 2005 Property for sale in 2009.

(ii) Expert report rejected

To support their claim, the plaintiffs relied upon an expert report which had calculated the plaintiffs alleged losses based on their inability to sell the 2005 Property. The plaintiffs' expert took the difference between the plaintiffs' actual cash flows and the cash flows they would have generated assuming that the 2005 Property had been sold in 2009 to calculate a loss of $390,000.

The lawyer challenged the admissibility of the expert's report on the grounds of relevancy and necessity.

The court held that the expert's report was inadmissible because it simply presented calculations based largely on assumptions and materials provided by the plaintiffs and their lawyer. The court determined that it was able to do most, if not all, of the calculations based on evidence from a lay witness and that while some evidence was obtained independently, that evidence was speculative.

As well, the court found that the expert's report was unreliable based on its assumptions and that it addressed damages that were not reasonably foreseeable.

(iii) Findings on damages

With respect to damages, although the lawyer had breached his duty of care to the plaintiffs, the bulk of the damages claimed were not reasonably foreseeable. It is a general principle of law that in a negligence action, the damages a plaintiff seeks must be reasonably foreseeable in both fact and law.

In this case, the plaintiffs' damages were not reasonably foreseeable.

The court accepted the lawyer's argument that in the circumstances the plaintiffs would have bought the 2005 Property despite the error in the property's legal description set out in the deed. Accordingly, recovery for the pure economic loss suffered by the plaintiffs was limited to the actual transaction and not secondary transactions.

This meant that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover damages for their alleged loss of opportunity in having their equity in the 2005 property tied up while it did not sell.

In any event it was found that the plaintiffs had led no reliable evidence that the 2005 Property was not selling because its property taxes were inflated or that they actually suffered any losses because the equity was tied up for a year-and-a-half. Also, there was no evidence that the real estate lawyer knew that the plaintiffs intended to use the equity in the 2005 Property to invest in condominiums. As a result, the damages sought for lost opportunity were not reasonably foreseeable.

Other losses claimed by the plaintiffs for loss of value in the 2005 Property and carrying costs, interest on the payment of property taxes, and aggravation and mental distress damages were also denied.

The court found that the only recoverable damages available to the plaintiffs was a small amount of money paid to the real estate lawyer to commence the application against the original seller. The court held that this money was paid for fees related to the real estate lawyer's error and that payment would have been unnecessary if the error had not been made.

(iv) Case under appeal

The plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Appeal of this decision.

(v) Assistance on the matter

Mr. Cook and Mr. Gfeller were assisted in the preparation of written legal argument presented at trial by Stephen Thiele, partner and Director of Legal Research for Gardiner Roberts LLP.

Footnotes

1 2019 ONCA 83

2 2019 ONSC 1162

3 (1994), 21 O.R. (3d) 1 (C.A.)

4 (1981), 35 O.R. (2d) 85 (C.A.)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stephen Thiele
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions