Canada: What Obligations Are Owed By A Testator To A Deceased Person's Estate?

In the Court's determination of a wills variation claim and what is "adequate, just and equitable", the Court will consider legal and moral obligations owed by the Deceased to the claimant.  If the claimant passes away after the deceased's death, does a legal or moral obligation remain?

Firstly, there is the issue of whether the claimant's estate can continue the claim after the claimant's death. This was dealt with in Currie Estate v Bowen, [1989] B.C.J. No. 250 ("Currie"), which was decided under the former Wills Variation Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 435. Hutchinson L.J.S.C. held as follows:

"I am satisfied that the Wills Variation Act granted Patience Currie the right to claim an equitable share in the estate of her husband. Because the right to advance this claim was granted by statute, is not founded in tort and as it is broader than a claim for mere support or maintenance, it follows that the cause of action survives the death of Patience Currie, it is not "actio personalis". This right vested in her at the time of Dennis Currie's death (Walker v. McDermott, [1931] S.C.R. 94, [1931] 1 D.L.R. 662 [B.C.]). While the statute does not explicitly authorize the claim to be made on her behalf by a personal representative as it did under s. 13 of the Testator's Family Maintenance Act, I find the words in s. 2, "in an action by or on behalf of the wife" authorize the commencement of this action by personal representatives."

This statement from the British Columbia Supreme Court in Currie is important as it highlights that a claim for wills variation is broader than a claim for mere support. This is in contrast to other provinces in Canada where the dependant's support regime is based upon the claimant's need for support or maintenance. In such provinces, the question of obligations owed to a deceased person's estate would be considered differently.

Currie was followed in the case of Lawrence v McGavin, [1992] B.C.J. No. 483 ("Lawrence"). In Lawrence, an application was brought to dismiss an action commenced on behalf of a deceased wife to vary the provisions of her late husband's will. The husband's will had divided the residue of his estate between his wife and son, however his wife's share was on condition that she survive him by thirty days and that she take her share. The wife died approximately forty days after the husband, but she was never able to take her interest under her husband's estate while she was alive. The action was commenced to vary the will to give the wife a greater share and remove the conditions.

With respect to standing, Spencer J. in Lawrence cited the Currie decision in stating that the question of standing with respect to deceased claimants had been decided. Interestingly, Spencer J. added "I do not wish to be understood as necessarily concurring with that decision" (Lawrence, at paragraph 5).

As Lawrence was decided prior to Tataryn v Tataryn Estate, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 807 ("Tataryn"), the seminal wills variation case in British Columbia, the Court considered the test in Walker vs. MeDermott (1931) S.C.R. 94. It was found that the wife had been destitute and ill, and that the deceased was aware of her serious illness. Although the wife had been living with another man before the deceased's death, that man had not been providing for her and the legal husband's obligation remained. However, the Court held that facts arising since the date of the testator's death could be taken into account. Those circumstances included that the wife had died shortly after her husband. On this point, Spencer J. stated, "Any variation of [the testator's] will must be governed so that it does not simply contribute to the corpus of [the deceased claimant's] estate for the benefit of her heirs whom the testator had no intent to advance and who he owed no duty" (Lawrence, at paragraph 8). Therefore, it was found that a life estate to the wife would have been a proper variation if she was alive, but now that she had died, "such an order would be academic."

In Tyas v Tyas Estate, [1994] B.C.W.L.D. 1053 ("Tyas") released a few months prior to Tataryn, a husband had been excluded from his wife's will. While the husband was alive at the time of trial, he was incapable and was represented by the Public Guardian and Trustee ("PGT") as his committee. It was noted in Tyas that the date for a determination under the Wills Variation Act of whether or not adequate provision had been made for the maintenance of the applicant is the date of the testator or testatrix's death, but, the Court should take into consideration the circumstances existing and reasonably foreseeable to the testator as at that date (Tyas, at paragraph 14, citing Landy v. Landy et al (1991) 44 E.T.R. 1 (B.C.C.A.)). Further, it was noted that the Court of Appeal in Landy provides that a substantial change in the circumstances of a potential claimant between the testator's death and trial may be taken into consideration.

In Tyas, the Court considered that:

  1. The deceased claimant and the testator had kept their finances separate;
  2. Each spouse saw their own descendants as beneficiaries of their own estates; and
  3. The Plaintiff was able to meet his day-to-day needs from his pension without drawing on his capital.

Boyle J. held that the husband's circumstances were readily and reasonably foreseeable, and that there was "no moral blemish" and "no failure of duty" in his exclusion from the testatrix's estate. It was ordered that a small amount, $15,000, which was just under 8% of the estate, be held in trust for the life of the plaintiff to be used at the PGT's discretion for the plaintiff's reasonable comforts.

This issue was considered again in Pelletier v Erb Estate, 2002 BCSC 1158 ("Pelletier"). In Pelletier, a father had left his estate to his two sons and had excluded his two daughters, one of which passed away after her father's death but before the date of trial. Justice Drost considered the comments of Justice Spencer in Lawrence, stating:

"With respect, I doubt that Mr. Justice Spencer intended his words to be taken as a statement of law applicable whenever a dependant spouse or child has died prior to the determination of a variation action. Each case must be decided on its own facts and merits." (Pelletier, at paragraph 63)

Justice Drost held that the father's estate be divided equally between the three living children and the deceased child's estate. While it was not explored in the reasons, it is worth noting that the deceased daughter had a child, who would presumably benefit from her share.

The most recent decision where this issue was raised is the case of Enns v Gordon Estate, 2018 BCSC 705 ("Gordon Estate"). In Gordon Estate, a wills variation claim had been commenced by two daughters of the deceased who had both experienced varying degrees of estrangement with the testator, their mother. The Court cited Pelletier for the principle that death does not disentitle an estate to relief on a wills variation claim, but it is a circumstance that may be considered (Gordon Estate, at paragraph 62). However, while the living daughter was awarded a portion of the deceased's estate, the deceased claimant's estate was not. The decision does not provide that the lack of award for the deceased daughter's estate was based on the fact that the claimant had died. At various points in the decision, it is noted that there was a lack of evidence on behalf of the deceased claimant's circumstances, particularly with respect to any mitigation of the reasons for her estrangement from the testator. It should also be noted that in Gordon Estate the testator had left her entire estate to charities and the two claimant daughters were the only individuals to whom the deceased owed a moral duty.

There is certainly no clear answer with respect to a deceased claimant's entitlement on a wills variation claim. As expressly stated in Pelletier, disputes of this nature will necessarily be considered on a case by case basis. Based on the available case law, it can be expected that a death (or severe illness) of a claimant that was reasonably foreseeable will have a stronger impact against the quantum of a will variation claim by an estate. While cases such as Lawrence and Tyas have shown resistance to making such variations in favour of an estate, more recent, post-Tataryn cases, such as Pelletier and Gordon Estate, have seemingly treated deceased claimants similarly to living individuals.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions