Canada: Crean v Canada - Rectification Article

Last Updated: March 6 2019
Article by David Rotfleisch

Introduction: The Tax Consequences of A Rectification Order

Rectification gives parties a means of fixing mistakes in a written agreement or other legal document. For instance, if a drafting error renders a legal instrument incompatible with the agreement that it was meant to document, the contracting parties may ask a court to rectify the instrument so that it aligns with their intended agreement. In other words, a court will rectify an erroneously drafted document to preserve the parties' true intentions.

Granted, to correct the mistake, the parties need not apply for a rectification order. They can simply agree to amend the mistaken document.

Yet a court rectification order offers one advantage that an amendment doesn't. Unlike a document amended by the parties themselves, a rectified document can undo a tax consequence resulting from its pre-rectified form. In other words, a rectification order also binds the CRA (e.g., see: Dale v Canada, [1977] 3 FC 235 (FCA)).

Rectification alters tax obligations because it speaks to the private-law relationships underlying those obligations. In other words, a person's tax obligations depend on that person's rights or duties under, say, contract law, property law, corporate law, and so forth. Canada's tax law generally respects the instruments purporting to create these private-law rights and duties. A rectification order effectively puts the parties into the position that they'd occupy had the impugned document been drafted correctly from the start. So, by altering these instruments, rectification alters the private-law rights and duties these instruments create, which, in turn, undoes the tax obligations resulting from these instruments as originally executed.

Tax-Policy Concerns: Rectification as Retroactive Tax Planning—"Another Kick at the Can"

Because rectification can undo tax consequences, it's no surprise that rectification jurisprudence is flooded with applicants who seek relief from unintended tax consequences stemming from purported drafting mistakes. The concern, however, is that taxpayers may use rectification for retroactive tax planning.

The CRA says that rectification amounts to retroactive tax planning if "the taxpayer is asking the court not to rectify the transaction back to its intended form, but to undo the intended transaction and put in place a new one formed after the original transaction." That is, if a rectified document were to put in place a transaction that the taxpayer had not intended until after executing the impugned document, the rectification order would essentially re-characterize the original transaction. And any pending tax litigation based on the transaction's original characterization becomes pointless. The risk, in other words, is that taxpayers may use rectification to move the goalposts in the tax game.

The Evidentiary Burden for Rectification: Proof of the Intended Agreement or Transaction

This concern prompted the Supreme Court of Canada to tighten the reins on rectification in tax cases. In Canada v Fairmont Hotels Inc. (2016 SCC 56), the Supreme Court clarified that "rectification is unavailable where the basis for seeking it is that one or both of the parties wish to amend not the instrument recording their agreement, but the agreement itself (ibid, at para 13, emphasis in original). In other words, where parties seek rectification, a court's task is "to restore the parties to their original bargain, not to rectify a belatedly recognized error of judgement by one party or the other" (ibid, quoting Performance Industries Ltd. v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd., 2002 SCC 19, at para 31).

To this end, the Supreme Court articulated a four-point test that applicants must satisfy before a court will grant rectification. Specifically, rectification is available only if:

  • there was a prior agreement with definite and ascertainable terms;
  • the agreement was still in effect at the time that the instrument was executed;
  • the instrument fails to accurately record the agreement; and
  • the instrument, if rectified, would carry out the parties' prior agreement (Fairmont, supra, at para 38).

In practice, this test means that, to be successful, rectification applicants typically need to produce documentary evidence of the intended transaction—e.g., a tax-planning memorandum, prior drafts of agreements, letters and emails to and from tax advisors, etc.

Crean v Canada illustrates how prior documents can make or break a tax rectification case. After examining the Crean case in detail, this article extracts the lessons from that case in the form of tax tips that our expert Canadian tax lawyers believe that taxpayers should find useful.

Crean v Canada, 2019 BCSC 146

Crean demonstrates not only the value of documenting your agreements but also the necessity of receiving tax-planning advice from an experienced Canadian tax lawyer (as opposed to relying solely on an accountant, who may overlook the more obscure or technical rules in Canada's Income Tax Act).

The Crean Brothers & the Crean Company Group

Two brothers, Mike and Tom Crean, ran a funeral-service business. Until August 2016, they had each equally owned the business using a holding-company/operating-company structure. Specifically, Mike and Tom each owned 50% of a holding company, which in turn owned 100% of the operating company through which the brothers ran the funeral business. These related corporations comprised the Crean Group.

The Agreement in Principle

By summer of 2016, Tom had sought to retire from the business and sell his interest to Mike. As a result, in May 2016, the Tom and Mike entered a written agreement in principle whereby the two roughly set out their intentions that Mike would purchase Tom's interest in the family business for $3.2 million. The first term of that agreement contained the following clause: "Mike to purchase all of Tom's interests in the Crean Group, direct or indirect, for the sum of $3,200,000 CDN. The full amount shall be payable to Tom in cash or by way of certified cheque, bank draft or solicitor's trust cheque on closing."

The Accountant's Plan & The Impugned Transactions

After the brothers entered the agreement in principle, they approached their accountant for advice on structuring the $3.2 million transaction. The accountant told the brothers that Mike should create a new corporation to purchase Tom's shares in the holding company. (It's not entirely clear why the accountant preferred this structure over one involving a direct sale from Tom to Mike. But this seemingly inconsequential decision would generate the entire dispute.)

So, in August 2016, per the advice of their accountant, the Crean brothers did the following:

  • Mike incorporated a numbered company and subscribed for 50 shares for $50;
  • Mike's and Tom's holding corporation paid a tax-free capital dividend to Tom in the amount of $450,000 (which went towards the purchase price of Tom's shares);
  • Mike transferred all his shares in the holding company to the numbered company, and, in exchange, Mike received another 50 shares in the numbered company (this transfer occurred on a rollover basis under section 85 of the Income Tax Act);
  • Tom sold all his shares in the holding company to the numbered company, and, in exchange Tom received a promissory note from the numbered company in the amount of $2.75 million (i.e., the remainder of the $3.2 million purchase price).

As a result of these transactions, Mike became the sole shareholder of the numbered company, and the numbered company became the sole shareholder of the holding company, which in turn owned the operating company.

When Tom filed his 2016 tax return, he reported his $2.75 million proceeds as a capital gain. (Under Canada's Income Tax Act, a capital gain is only one-half taxable. Other sources of income—such as business income or dividends—are fully taxable.)

The Problem: The Anti-Surplus-Stripping Rule under Section 84.1 & Deemed Dividends

The problem with the accountant's plan was that Tom's sale to the numbered company had triggered section 84.1 of the Income Tax Act. Section 84.1 is an anti-avoidance rule that seeks to bar individuals from surplus stripping corporations. Basically, surplus stripping is when, by using non-arm's-length transactions, an individual shareholder extracts a corporation's retained earnings as a capital gain or tax-free return of capital rather than as a taxable dividend.

Section 84.1 applies if:

  • an individual taxpayer sells shares to a corporation;
  • the individual doesn't deal at arm's length with the purchasing corporation; and
  • after the sale, the purchasing corporation controls the corporation whose shares it purchased.

If the rule applies, then the individual seller is deemed to receive a dividend to the extent that the non-share consideration from the purchasing corporation exceeded the greater of (i) the seller's adjusted cost base (ACB) of the shares sold and (ii) the paid up capital (PUC) of the shares sold.

For a detailed explanation of adjusted cost base (ACB) and paid up capital (PUC), see our article: "Taxation of Shareholders: The Basic Deemed-Dividend Tax Rules"

Tom triggered section 84.1 when he sold his half of the shares in the holding company to his brother's numbered company: he was an individual that sold shares to a corporation; the purchasing corporation was non-arm's length because his brother owned it; and, after the sale, the purchasing corporation controlled the corporation whose shares it purchased.

As a result, the $2.75 million promissory note from the numbered company resulted in a deemed dividend to Tom. So, rather than incurring a half-taxable $2.75 million capital gain, Tom was deemed to receive a fully taxable $2.75 million dividend. (To make matters worse, the deemed dividend under section 84.1 doesn't qualify for a dividend tax credit. The standard section 84 deemed-dividend rules, however, do qualify for a dividend tax credit.)

The Rectification Application

Ironically, had Tom sold his shares in the holding company directly to Mike (rather than to Mike's numbered company), section 84.1 wouldn't apply. And Tom's proceeds would retain their capital-gains characterization.

For this reason, Tom, Mike, the holding company, and the numbered company applied to the Supreme Court of British Columbia for rectification. In particular, they asked the court to rectify two documents: (1) the August 2016 agreement under which Tom sold his holding-company shares to Mike's numbered company; and (2) the $2.75 million promissory note from the numbered company to Tom.

The August 2016 agreement, they claimed, should have been drafted to record a transaction by which Tom sells his holding-company shares directly to Mike, who in turn sells those shares to his own numbered company. Likewise, the $2.75 million promissory note from the numbered company to Tom should have been a note from Mike to Tom.

After a through examination of rectification principles in the tax context, the court granted the rectification application. The court's decision relied heavily on Tom and Mike's May 2016 agreement in principle—and, in particular, the following clause from that agreement:

Mike to purchase all of Tom's interests in the Crean Group, direct or indirect, for the sum of $3,200,000 CDN. The full amount shall be payable to Tom in cash or by way of certified cheque, bank draft or solicitor's trust cheque on closing.

This clause, the court observed, constituted evidence of a definite and ascertainable prior agreement whereby the parties intended that Tom sell his interest in the Crean Group directly to Mike. In particular, the clause suggested that the transaction was intended as one between Mike and Tom. The clause's reference to "direct or indirect" spoke not to the manner of the sale—i.e. directly to Mike or indirectly through Mike's numbered company; it spoke to the subject of the sale—i.e., Tom would sell his direct or indirect interests in the Crean Group.

Moreover, Tom and Mike's accountant testified that, when he drafted the August 2016 purchase agreement (!), he mistakenly listed Mike's numbered company as the purchaser. Although this didn't explain why the accountant had suggested the creation of the numbered company in the first place, the accountant insisted that his clients' instructions were "Mike wanted to purchase Tom's shares and that they wanted it to be a direct sale" (Crean, supra, at para 48).

Because the Crown didn't press the issue of the numbered company's existence (or, for that matter, cross-examine the Creans on whether they in fact intended a direct transfer), the B.C. Supreme Court sided with the Creans and granted rectification.

Tom therefore managed to dodge the bullet on the fully taxable $2.75 million deemed dividend.

Tax Tips: Tax Rectification & the Importance of a Tax-Planning Memo by an Experienced Canadian Tax Lawyer

Canada imposes onerous requirements on a party seeking rectification. In particular, you must demonstrate that the documented transaction or agreement wasn't the one that you had intended. The Crean decision illustrates the importance of supporting your intentions with documentary evidence.

It also demonstrates the importance of turning to an experienced Canadian tax lawyer to ensure that you avoid planning mistakes in the first place. Even experienced accountants may overlook the more obscure or technical rules in Canada's Income Tax Act—like the section 84.1 anti-surplus-stripping rule that played a role in Crean. A tax-planning memorandum by an experienced Canadian tax lawyer will not only help you evade unintended tax consequences but also serve as evidence of your intended transaction or agreement. Consult one of our experienced Canadian tax lawyers, who can plan your transaction to minimize tax liability and draft the related instruments so that they match your intentions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions