Canada: Time Period Expired: Claim For Contribution And Indemnity Dismissed

Last Updated: February 5 2019
Article by Stephen Thiele

Finality is an important concept in law. Finality provides certainty to the meaning of the law and ensures that the legal process is not endless.

While dissatisfied litigants often have the right to appeal a negative decision, a litigant's action can never proceed beyond a final decision of the Supreme Court of Canada.

A litigant is also required to start his or her claim in a timely fashion. People are entitled to live free from the spectre of litigation peering over their shoulder from incidents that occurred many, many years ago.

In Ontario, there is a general two year limitation period in which an action must be commenced against a wrongdoer, and, in most cases, there is also an ultimate 15-year limitation period that applies to undiscovered claims. Accordingly, a litigant's failure to commence his or her action before the expiration of an applicable limitation period will result in the dismissal of the claim and give the alleged wrongdoer finality.

It is for this latter reason that cases involving disputes about limitation periods often focus on when a claim was discovered or was discoverable. For a plaintiff, the principle of discoverability as now proscribed under s. 5 of the Limitations Act, 2002 is used to delay the running of the limitation period. For a defendant, the principle of discoverability is used to ensure that a limitation period for a claim started to run as early as possible on the facts of any given case.

As determined in the recent case of Reichert v. Meyrick1, the foregoing applies to claims for contribution and indemnity. In this case, lawyers had represented the plaintiffs in a mortgage transaction, but had not been sued for contribution and indemnity based on negligence until more than two years after the male plaintiff had been sued for default under the mortgage.

The court was required to determine if the claim was started outside the general two year limitation period or if there were circumstances that delayed the discoverability of the claim.

After considering sections 5 and 18 (which specifically applied to claims for contribution and indemnity) of Ontario's Limitation Act, 2002, the court concluded that the plaintiffs' action had not been started in time and dismissed the action.

The Facts

On February 23, 2011, the plaintiffs committed to a mortgage for a property in which they alleged they had been living as tenants. The plaintiffs asserted that the property was owned by a family trust and that the male plaintiff was acting as a trustee when he took the mortgage for the property. Indeed, the handwritten word "trustee", added by the plaintiff, appeared in two places on the mortgage commitment documents.

The defendant lawyers provided independent legal advice to the male plaintiff in connection with the mortgage and insisted that they told him that he could be personally liable under the mortgage if it went into default and a sale of the property did not result in proceeds sufficient to satisfy any outstanding indebtedness that might be owed to the mortgagees. The female plaintiff had consented to the mortgage as the spouse of the male plaintiff.

The mortgage went into default and on March 13, 2012 a notice of sale under the mortgage was served on the plaintiffs. A month later, the male plaintiff advised the mortgagees that he was not a mortgagor and that the family trust was the legal and registered owner of the property.

On November 27, 2012, the mortgagees started an action for possession of the property and for payment in the amount of nearly $900,000 from the male plaintiff. In defending this action, the male plaintiff pled that the family trust owned the property, that a personal claim was unfounded, that the family trust was the mortgagor and that there was no personal liability under the mortgage.

The Court summarily granted the mortgagees' claim for possession on April 18, 2013. Among other things, the Court held that the mortgage was valid, that the plaintiffs failed to meet the burden of proof that a family trust owned the property and that the male plaintiff was the mortgagor, with the female plaintiff consenting to the mortgage as his spouse.

An appeal of this decision was dismissed on October 2, 2013.

On November 4, 2014, the sale of the property was approved and less than two years following the sale, on April 27, 2016, the plaintiffs issued a claim for contribution and indemnity against the lawyers who had provided independent legal advice.

The substance of the claim was that the lawyers were negligent for failing to make clear that the male plaintiff was personally liable under the mortgage.

The Arguments

The lawyers sought to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim on the grounds that their action was statute-barred, that it was an abuse of process, and that, as a matter law, the execution of the mortgage as "trustee" still rendered the male plaintiff personally liable on the mortgage.

With respect to the limitation period argument, the lawyers contended that the potential action against them was discoverable as early as April 2012, or alternatively was discoverable when the plaintiffs were sued in their personal capacity on November 27, 2012 and at the latest when judgment was granted against them on April 18, 2013.

In contrast, the plaintiffs argued that their claim for contribution and indemnity against the lawyers was not discoverable until the court approved the sale of the property on November 4, 2014 because until such time no damages flowed from the lawyers' alleged negligence.

To support their argument, the plaintiffs relied on sections 5(1)(a)(i) and 5(1)(a)(iv) of the Limitations Act, 2002.

Court concludes that action is statute-barred

The court ruled in favour of the defendant lawyers on the grounds that the plaintiffs' claim against them was discoverable on December 2, 2012 when the mortgagees' claim was served, or at the latest on April 18, 2013 when summary judgment had been granted for possession of the property in favour of the mortgagees.

The Court explained that in considering discoverability, it was required to look at both subjective and objective factors.

The start of a limitation period was triggered by the earlier of when a plaintiff first knew of the criteria set out in sections 5(1)(a)(i) to 5(1)(a)(iv) of the Act, or when a reasonable person with the abilities and in the circumstances of the plaintiff first ought to have known of the matters set out in those sections.

The criteria were conjunctive.

While under section 5(2) of the Act, a plaintiff could rebut the presumption that they knew they had a claim on the day an act or omission took place, under section 18(1), in a case where a claim was brought by one alleged wrongdoer against another for contribution and indemnity – like in this case – the day on which the first alleged wrongdoer was served with the claim in respect of which contribution and indemnity was sought, is deemed to be the day the act or omission on which the alleged wrongdoer's claim was based took place.

The court noted that section 18 of the Act formed part of a comprehensive reform of limitation period law in Ontario and that its purpose was to provide that when a party sought contribution and indemnity, the claim on which contribution and indemnity was sought was deemed to be discoverable when a plaintiff was served with the original statement of claim.

This section applied to claims not only between tortfeasors, but between "wrongdoers" for other types of claims.

Applied to this case, the court held that the day the plaintiffs were served in the mortgagees action claiming that they were personally liable under the mortgage was the day that the act or omission they allege against the lawyers took place because the plaintiffs' claim against the lawyers was in substance a claim for contribution and indemnity relating to the claim by the mortgagees against the plaintiffs.

In the mortgagees original claim, it was clearly pleaded that the male plaintiff was personally liable as a mortgagor. Thus, the court reasoned that the plaintiffs were on notice of potential personal exposure under the mortgage once they had been served with the mortgagees claim.

In the alternative, the court found that the plaintiffs' claim against the lawyers was discoverable when the mortgagees were granted summary judgment for possession of the property. On that summary judgment motion, the motions judge had expressly found that the property was owned and controlled by the male plaintiff, and that the male plaintiff was the chargor on the mortgage.

The court in Reichert expressly dismissed the notion that the limitation period for the plaintiffs' claim for contribution and indemnity against the lawyers commenced to run from the date the sale of the property was approved by another judge on the basis that for a claim to be discoverable a plaintiff was only required to know, or reasonable ought to have known, that they suffered damage allegedly caused by the wrongful act or omission of the defendant.

Despite the plaintiffs' argument that the actual amount of their damages were not known until the order for sale was approved, the court held that a plaintiff did not need to know the extent of the damage for the claim to be discoverable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stephen Thiele
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions