Canada: Court Of Appeal Rates Arbitration Clause One Star In Proposed Employment Class Action Against Uber

Last Updated: January 8 2019
Article by Paul-Erik Veel

Heller v Uber Technologies Inc highlights the tension between two competing adjudicative mechanisms, each of which legislatures have encouraged: private arbitration and class actions. Justice Perell's decision gave primacy to parties' ability to agree to arbitration and thereby opt out of class actions, affirming the policy goals underlying arbitration legislation. By contrast, the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision took the opposite approach, affirming the importance of ensuring that arbitration clauses do not defeat the ability of individuals to bring class actions to vindicate the rights of a group.

A frequently litigated issue in Canadian class actions is the extent to which parties can agree in advance to opt out of class actions in favour of private arbitration. In the context of consumer protection claims, provincial legislatures have generally eliminated the ability of defendants to defeat class actions through arbitrations by declaring clauses requiring the parties to submit such disputes to private arbitrations to be void.  However, it has remained an open question as to whether and when courts would enforce arbitration clauses in other contexts, where the effect of such enforcement would be to defeat a proposed class proceeding.

In the employment context, it appeared that at least some courts were prepared to enforce arbitration clauses in contractor agreements, thereby defeating the ability by individuals who claimed that they had been systemically misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees to bring class actions to claim rights under employment standards legislation. As I blogged about last year, Justice Perell's decision in Heller v Uber Technologies Inc signalled that courts could and would enforce arbitration clauses in independent contractor agreements.

However, in its first decision of 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed Justice Perell's decision and allowed the proposed class action against Uber to proceed.

The background to the decision is set out in my previous blog post. In brief, David Heller, an Ontario resident and Uber driver, brought a proposed class action against a series of Uber companies, alleging that he and other proposed class members were improperly classified as "independent contractors" instead of "employees" and that they were thus deprived of the statutory benefits provided by Ontario's Employment Standards Act. In order to become an Uber driver, Mr. Heller had entered into two contracts with two different Uber companies. Each of these contracts contained a clause requiring that disputes be submitted to arbitration. Uber brought a pre-certification motion to stay the proceedings, arguing that Mr. Heller's agreements required him to submit any disputes arising under his agreements to arbitration in the Netherlands.

In a decision released in January of 2018, Justice Perell accepted Uber's position and stayed the proposed class proceeding in favour of arbitration in the Netherlands. Giving expression to the policy goals of the International Commercial Arbitration Act, 2017, Justice Perell held that the agreements between Uber and its drivers were "international commercial agreements" to which the Act applied. Consequently, he held the arbitration clauses were presumptively valid and that any challenges to the arbitrator's jurisdiction should be made before the arbitrator. He also held that the arbitration clauses were not unconscionable.

Mr. Heller appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal set aside the stay and permitted Mr. Heller's proposed class action to continue.

The Court of Appeal first held that Justice Perell's decision was subject to review on a correctness standard. The Court applied this standard of review for two reasons: first, because the central issues regarding the interpretation of various arbitration statutes were questions of law; and second, because the Court was interpreting arbitration clauses in a standard form contract.

The Court of Appeal then held that the arbitration clauses in the agreements between Uber and their drivers were invalid, because they represented an unlawful contracting out of protections granted to employees under the Employment Standards Act. Specifically, the Court held that the arbitration clauses would eliminate the right of an Uber driver to make a complaint to the Ministry of Labour, as permitted under the Employment Standards Act. Because the arbitration clause would have eliminated a right that the drivers had under the ESA, it was unlawful and unenforceable. Importantly, the Court of Appeal held that the arbitration provision was unenforceable, even though the plaintiff was seeking to bring a proposed class action, rather than make a complaint to the Ministry of Labour.

The Court of Appeal also independently held that the arbitration clauses were invalid on the basis that they were unconscionable. In so doing, the Court relied heavily on the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Douez v Facebook, Inc, where the Supreme Court of Canada declined to apply a forum selection clause in favour of California that would have defeated a proposed privacy class action in British Columbia. The Court of Appeal in Heller held that the arbitration clause was unconscionable because:

  • The arbitration clause represented a substantially improvident or unfair bargain, including because it effectively required claimants to pay large up-front costs to take advantage of the arbitration process;
  • There was no evidence the claimant had received any legal advice;
  • There was a significant inequality of bargaining power between the claimant and Uber; and
  • Uber included the arbitration clause in the agreement in order to favour itself.

Consequently, the Court of Appeal concluded that the arbitration clauses were invalid and unenforceable. As a result, it set aside the stay of Mr. Heller's proposed class action.

As I noted previously, the Heller case highlights the tension between two competing adjudicative mechanisms, each of which legislatures have encouraged: private arbitration and class actions. Justice Perell's decision gave primacy to parties' ability to agree to arbitration and thereby opt out of class actions, affirming the policy goals underlying arbitration legislation. By contrast, the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision took the opposite approach, affirming the importance of ensuring that arbitration clauses do not defeat the ability of individuals to bring class actions to vindicate the rights of a group.

The Court of Appeal's decision may strike many as intuitively fair, given the difficulties that individual class members would have in pursuing their claims in private arbitrations.  Yet if that is judged to be desirable, it seems strange that the legislature would not have explicitly precluded the availability of arbitrations for employment disputes, as it has in the consumer protection context. 

Indeed, the natural consequence of the Court of Appeal's decision would appear to be that any arbitration clause in an employment agreement is unenforceable, since any such arbitration clause would preclude an individual from making a complaint to the Ministry of Labour. To hold that all arbitration clauses in employment contracts are unenforceable would not be a sensible result: there are many circumstances where both employers and employees would have legitimate interests in resolving their employment-related disputes in private. 

Given the difficult competing policy issues at play, this remains an area that cries out for legislative clarification.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions