ARTICLE
22 November 2018

Federal Government To Implement Wells v. Canada (Attorney General) And Reassess 58,000 Applications For Membership In The Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation

GW
Gowling WLG

Contributor

Gowling WLG is an international law firm built on the belief that the best way to serve clients is to be in tune with their world, aligned with their opportunity and ambitious for their success. Our 1,400+ legal professionals and support teams apply in-depth sector expertise to understand and support our clients’ businesses.
Yesterday, representatives of the federal government and the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation of Newfoundland announced that - as a result of the litigation advanced by Gowling WLG - it will reassess approximately 58,000 membership applications ...
Canada Government, Public Sector

Yesterday, representatives of the federal government and the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation of Newfoundland announced that - as a result of the litigation advanced by Gowling WLG - it will reassess approximately 58,000 membership applications for membership denied on the basis of the evidentiary criteria set aside in Wells v. Canada.

The federal government also announced that it will now enter into exploratory discussions regarding the unfair treatment of veterans, RCMP officers, and other groups who have been particularly adversely effected by the enrollment criteria.

According to a press release issued by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, "individuals affected by the Wells v. Canada decision will be contacted by mail in January 2019 with information on how to submit additional documents to have their application reassessed. Those who wish to have their applications reviewed will be asked to submit the form and documents with a postmark no later than 100 days after receipt of their letter."

Jaimie Lickers and John Wilson of Gowling WLG's Indigenous Law Group were honoured to represent David Wells and Sandra Wells in these matters through the generous support of the Mi'kmaq First Nations Assembly of Newfoundland. Click here for more information on the Wells v. Canada decisions.

Read the original article on GowlingWLG.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More