Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Saturday, July 7, 2018


* A Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench has summarily dismissed the claims of two Alberta seed potato growers who sought damages against the CFIA on the ground that the CFIA was allegedly negligent in testing for the presence of Potato Cyst Nematode ("PCN"). Based on alleged false positive PCN tests, the CFIA had required the potato growers to destroy their seed potato crops, and prevented them from producing or selling seed potatoes. Both potato producers had applied for and received funding pursuant to a Seed Potato Assistance program partially funded by the Federal Government, which had been established to compensate potato growers for losses sustained as a result of PCN destruction orders and quarantines, and the closure of the US and Mexican borders to the export of Alberta seed potatoes. The claims were summarily dismissed based on the provisions of s. 9 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act which provides that "no proceedings lie against the respect of a claim if.compensation has been paid.out of the Consolidated Revenue respect of.damage or loss and in respect of which the claim is made". (North Bank Potato Farms Ltd. v. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, CALN/2018-017, [2018] A.J. No. 818, Alberta Court of Queen's Bench)


North Bank Potato Farms Ltd. v. Canadian Food Inspection Agency;


Fulltext: [2018] A.J. No. 818;

2018 ABQB 505,

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench,

J.A. Fagnan J.,

June 29, 2018.

Section 9 of Crown Liability and Proceedings Act -- Receipt of Federal Assistance for Crop Quarantine -- Bar Against Subsequent Negligence Action.

North Bank Potato Farms Ltd. and Haarsma Farms Ltd. (collectively, the "Potato Producers") sued The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (the "CFIA") and ABC Laboratory in negligence, claiming the loss of profits, goodwill and land value. The Potato Producers alleged the CFIA had been negligent in testing their land for the presence of Potato Cyst Nemotode ("PCN"), and in concluding that PCN was present in their land, when the tests only disclosed "false positive" results.

The CFIA appealed to the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench from a decision of a Master, who refused to strike out the Potato Producers' pleadings or to summarily dismiss the Potato Producers' claim against the CFIA.

In 2006, the Governments of Quebec, Idaho, Canada and the United States had negotiated and agreed to a protocol on the sampling and surveillance of potato farms for the presence of PCN.

In mid-2007, the CFIA tested soil samples from the Potato Producers' fields for the presence of PCN.

In late 2007 PCN cysts were identified in the test results of potato fields farmed by the Potato Producers.

The Potato Producers were consequently required to destroy their existing seed potatoes and were prevented from producing and selling their crops from the lands on which the cysts were detected, and were required to follow a cleaning protocol for their farm equipment.

In the summer of 2008 the Government of Canada and the Government of Alberta announced the creation of an Alberta Seed Potato Assistance program for seed producers who were directed to destroy seed potatoes, or who are prevented from producing or selling them and to clean their equipment, in accordance with restrictive measures imposed pursuant to the Plant Protection Act, SC 1990, c. 22 and its regulations.

The Government of Canada contributed $8 million to this program and losses directly and indirectly related to the quarantine of their farms and the subsequent border closure to Alberta seed potatoes in the United States and Mexico pursuant to s. 34 of the Financial Administration Act, RSC 1985, c. F-11. Sixty percent of the funding for the program was provided by the Federal Government. The balance of the funding was provided by the Alberta Government. The program was administered by an Alberta agency - Agriculture Financial Services Corporation ("AFSC").

Approximately 120 Notices of Prohibition and Restricted Activity were issued by the CFIA in Alberta with respect to the Potato Producers' fields, and the fields of a number of other potato producers.

The Potato Producers applied for and received assistance in 2008 and 2009 pursuant to the Seed Potato Assistance program.

The CFIA argued that s. 9 and 38 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, RSC 1985, c. C-50 barred the Potato Producers' claim because the Federal Government had already paid the claims, and that because these claims arose from actions authorized and required by the Plant Protection Act. Sections 9 and 38 provide:

9 No proceedings lie against the Crown or a servant of the Crown in respect of a claim if a pension or compensation has been paid or is payable out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund or out of any funds administered by an agency of the Crown in respect of the death, injury, damage or loss in respect of which the claim is made.


38 If a person must, under this Act, do anything or permit an inspector to do anything, Her Majesty in right of Canada is not liable

  1. for any costs, loss or damage resulting from the compliance; or
  2. to pay any fee, including any rent or charge, for what is done or permitted to be done.

The CFIA argued, in the alternative, that the CFIA did not owe a duty of care in negligence to the Potato Producers.

The Master dismissed the CFIA's applications on the basis that the action raised novel but arguable claims, and that a fair and just adjudication could not be made on the record.

Additional Affidavits were filed by the CFIA prior to the appeal hearing before a Queen's Bench Justice.

Decision: Fagnan, J allowed the CFIA's appeal and summarily dismissed the Potato Producers' claims [at para. 81 and 82].

Fagnan, J observed [at para. 48] that while it may be possible to determine in a summary judgment application whether a novel duty of care is owed, it is often preferable to consider novel claims at a trial, on a full factual record, relying on Condominium Corporation No. 0321365 v Cuthbert, 2016 ABCA 46, [2016] A.J. No. 174.

Fagnan, J reviewed the case law with respect to Crown liability in detail at para. 49 to 61.

She observed [at para. 63] that there is no dispute that PCN falls within the definition of a "pest" under the Plant Protection Act, that there was also no dispute that the CFIA had authority to exercise powers under various statutes and regulations, including the Plant Protection Act, to regulate production of seed potatoes, or of the authority of CFIA inspectors, who believe on reasonable grounds that a thing is infested by a pest to issue a Notice of Prohibition including orders of seizure, quarantine, confiscation and destruction.

Fagnan, J also observed [at para. 65 and 66] that it was also not in dispute that the CFIA had an obligation to conduct sampling and surveillance of potato farms to test for the presence of PCN, in order to meet its obligations under the agreement Canada had negotiated with the United States.

Fagnan, J also observed [at para. 70] that the 2008 and 2009 assistance programs administered by AFSC were intended to assist producers in dealing with expenses and losses sustained as a result of quarantine measures imposed by the CFIA and subsequent border closures to Alberta seed potatoes for export.

Fagnan, J held [at para. 72] that there was no doubt that 60% of the funding for the assistance program came from the Federal Consolidated Revenue Fund, and that the critical question was not how the funds under the program was administered, but whether the Potato Producers received benefit of funding from the Consolidated Revenue Fund through the programs.

Fagnan, J rejected the Potato Producers' arguments that the CFIA was required to obtain an acknowledgement or release in relation to the compensation they had received in order to be able to successfully rely on the immunity provided for under s. 9 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act [at para. 73].

Fagnan, J summarized the case law in a number of cases in which the receipt of compensation from the Federal Government triggered the application of s. 9 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act [at para. 77]:

  • ordering destruction of cattle in the face of a lack of evidence to support such a measure, and negligently testing for disease [Langille v Canada (Minister of Agriculture), [1992] 2 FC 208, [1992] FCJ No 139 (CA)]
  • failing to make compensation for a lost herd in a timely way resulting in loss to a restaurant business and mental and physical anguish [Vona v Canada (Minister of Agriculture) (1996), [1996] OJ No 3621 (CA)]
  • allowing bovine tuberculosis to get into Canada and failing to take appropriate actions to eradicate the disease when it was first detected [Begg v Canada, No 808, aff'd, 2005 FCA 362,[2005] FCJ No 1819]
  • failing to intervene in a timely manner to prevent contamination from another producer [Ferme Avicole Kiamike v Canada, 2006 FC 872,[2006] FCJ No. 1107]
  • negligently investigating by way of delays in testing (River Valley Poultry) [River Valley Poultry, 2009 ONCA 326,[2009] OJ No 1605,95 OR (3d) 1, leave denied [2009] SCCCA No 259]
  • failing to guard against importation of diseased cattle [Vancise v Canada (Attorney General) [2018] OJ No 16].

Fagnan, J then concluded [at para 78 and 80] as follows:

[78] In all of these cases, the courts determined that receipt of compensation, even partial compensation, from the federal government triggered the application of s. 9 of the CLPA. This is a consistent body of largely appellate authority. The fact that those cases dealt with livestock rather than potatoes does not mean the law is unsettled in this area.


[80] In this case, the Court is able to reach a fair and just determination on the merits as the summary judgment process allows the Court to make the necessary findings of fact, and to apply the law to the facts. The Respondents received payments in relation to measures imposed following positive PCN test results in 2007. They received the benefit of funding which came from the Consolidated Revenue Fund as part of those payments. While the payments may not have fully compensated the Respondents for all of the loss they suffered as a result of the testing done in 2007, they nevertheless constitute "compensation" paid "in respect of the.damage or loss in respect of which the claim is made" for the purposes of s. 9.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions