Canada: Court Of Appeal Rules On Latest Contaminated Lands Case: Huang v Fraser Hillary's Limited

On June 8, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its latest decision dealing with liability for contaminated lands: Huang v. Fraser Hillary's Limited.1 This decision pits an owner of contaminated property, Mr. Huang, against a dry cleaner business who contaminated Mr. Huang's property, Fraser Hillary's Limited (FHL).

Mr. Huang owns two commercial properties in Ottawa at 1255 Bank Street and 1263 Bank Street that are directly south of FHL's property at 1235 Bank Street. From 1960 onwards, FHL operated a dry cleaning business at 1235 Bank Street. Mr. Hillary, the president and sole director of FHL, owns a residence at 36 Cameron Avenue, adjacent to 1235 Bank Street.2

Spills of dry cleaning solvents containing tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) were known to have occurred between 1960 and 1974 at FHL's dry cleaning operation. In 1974, FHL bought new equipment and used new practices that eliminated the potential for subsequent spills.3

In 2002, Mr. Huang discovered TCE at his properties and claimed against FHL and Mr. Hillary.4 Mr. Huang sued under five separate causes of action:, nuisance, s. 99(2) liability under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA),5 negligence, trespass, and strict liability.6

Trial Decision

At trial, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (ONSC) held FHL liable in nuisance and under EPA, s. 99(2). The ONSC awarded Mr. Huang over $1.8 million in damages for the cost to remediate Mr. Huang's properties.7 The ONSC did not find Mr. Hillary liable as homeowner of 36 Cameron.

Nuisance – The ONSC found that FHL had caused an interference with Mr. Huang's use or enjoyment of land that was both substantial and non-trivial. 8 In making this determination, the Court considered factors including:

  • the contamination was present above MOECC standards and continued to migrate
  • the contaminants had the potential to cause adverse effects
  • Mr. Huang was unable to redevelop his properties until they were remediated, and
  • the cost of remediation was significant.9

The ONSC did not find Mr. Hillary personally liable under nuisance because he did not own land abutting 1255 Bank or 1263 Bank. Additionally, Mr. Hillary was not liable for permitting a nuisance to continue as Mr. Hillary did not know about the contamination until after Mr. Huang's properties were already contaminated.10

EPA, s. 99 – In finding FHL liable under EPA, s. 99, the ONSC rejected FHL's arguments that EPA, s. 99 could not be applied retrospectively. FHL had argued that the spills occurred from 1960 to 1974, well before the section of the EPA came into force in 1985.11 Further, FHL argued that "the language of the EPA does not expressly or implicitly provide that it operates retrospectively."12

The ONSC found that applying EPA, s. 99(2) did not constitute a retrospective application but rather a prospective application as it "enables such a right to compensation at this time or in the future for loss or damage incurred as a direct result of such spills."13 The ONSC further noted that "the intent of the legislature is to afford compensation now for spills, which would obviously include earlier spills."14

The ONSC found that Mr. Hillary was not liable under EPA, s. 99 in his capacity as homeowner of 36 Cameron. This was because Mr. Hillary was not the owner or person having charge, management or control of the pollutant before the first discharge.15

Negligence – The ONSC found that while both FHL and Mr. Hillary owed Mr. Huang a duty of care, neither defendant breached its standard of care until about 2013. Mr. Huang had not demonstrated any additional harm or loss suffered as a result of the defendants' inaction post 2013.

Trespass – The ONSC dismissed Mr. Huang's claim under trespass, finding that the PCE and TCE had entered Mr. Huang's property indirectly.16

Strict Liability – The ONSC held that the use of PCE and TCE was not a "non-natural" or "special" use of FHL's property. Accordingly, Mr. Huang's claim under strict liability was unfounded.

Damage Award – The ONSC awarded damages for the cost to remediate Mr. Huang's properties. The ONSC preferred the remediation strategies that were most likely to put the plaintiff back in its original position had the tort not occurred.17

Appeal – FHL appealed the ONSC judgment on the grounds that the ONSC erred in finding FHL liable for damages under EPA, s. 99(2) and in nuisance. Mr. Huang cross appealed on the grounds that the ONSC erred in finding the defendants not liable in trespass, strict liability, and negligence, and in dismissing the claim against Mr. Hillary.

Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal (ONCA) dismissed both appeals from the trial judgment.18

The ONCA agreed with the ONSC that FHL should be liable in nuisance. In doing so, the ONCA dismissed FHL's argument that foreseeability of harm is a required element of nuisance that the trial judge had failed to consider. The ONCA based its finding on the lack of any binding Canadian authority requiring foreseeability as a constituent element of nuisance.19

The ONCA also upheld the ONSC's finding that Mr. Hillary was not liable in nuisance since his residential property at 36 Cameron was not the source of the contaminant.20

The ONCA rejected FHL's arguments about the retrospective application of the EPA, Part X. The ONCA held that the trial judge did not retrospectively apply the EPA, and that there was an "ongoing obligation under s. 93 of the EPA to remediate the damage."21 Even though the spills occurred before Part X of the EPA came into force, the ONCA noted that FHL's obligations under the legislation are ongoing.22

The ONCA upheld the ONSC's assessment and award for damages based on the cost to remediate Mr. Huang's properties.23

Key Takeaways

The ONCA decision confirms that foreseeability is not a constituent element of the tort of nuisance. In making this finding, the ONCA conducted a review of Canadian and international jurisprudence on nuisance.

The ONCA applied EPA, s. 93 and s. 99 to a spill that occurred before Part X was proclaimed into force. This is an important application of Part X in the developing body of jurisprudence on s. 99, on the heels of ONCA's groundbreaking decision in Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson.24 The ONCA confirmed that EPA, s. 93 triggers an ongoing obligation to remediate damage, even though the spills occurred before the enactment of Part X of the EPA.

The ONCA's decision to award damages for the cost to remediate continues a line of decisions on damages to compensate for environmental harm. The ONCA accepted the trial judge's selection of remediation strategies that were most likely to restore Mr. Huang to the position he would have been in had the contamination not occurred.25 Courts are trending towards awarding restoration costs as the appropriate measure of damages rather than diminution in value of property. In doing so, courts are sending a message about the importance of fully compensating plaintiffs and restoring them to their original positions –a fundamental principle of tort damages.26

Finally, Mr. Hillary was only sued in his capacity as an owner of 36 Cameron and not as an officer and director of FHL. It would have been interesting to see whether the courts would have found liability against Mr. Hillary had he been sued in his capacity as an officer and director.


1 Huang v Fraser Hillary's Limited, 2018 ONCA 527 [Huang ONCA].

2 Huang v Fraser Hillary's Limited, 2017 ONSC 1500 at para 1-4 [Huang ONSC].

3 Huang ONCA at para 7.

4 The claim against Mr. Hillary was in his capacity as the owner of 36 Cameron and not as an officer and director of FHL.

5 RSO 1990, c E 19.

6 Huang ONSC at para 5.

7 Huang ONCA.

8 Huang ONSC at para 125. 

9 Huang ONSC at para 125.

10 Ibid at para 149.

11 Ibid at paras 78-79.

12 Ibid at para 80.

13 Ibid at para 84.

14 Ibid at para 99.

15 Ibid at para 103.

16 Ibid at paras 52-55. 

17 Huang ONCA at para 42.

18 Huang ONCA.

19 Ibid at para 22.

20 Ibid at para 28.

21 Ibid at para 31.

22 Ibid.

23 Ibid at para 42. 

24 Midwest Properties Ltd. v Thordarson, 2015 ONCA 819.

25 Ibid at para 42.

26 Athey v Leonati [1996] 3 SCR 458, [1996] SCJ No 102. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Charles Birchall
Victoria Chai
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions