Canada: Supreme Court Defers To Law Societies In Denial Of TWU's Law School

Last Updated: July 4 2018
Article by Jason Kully and Gregory Sim

In the related decisions of Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western University, 2018 SCC 32, and Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 33, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that the Law Societies of British Columbia and Ontario could deny accreditation to Trinity Western University's (TWU) proposed law school. This is the final word in a long-running legal battle of particular interest to the legal profession and to members of the LGBTQIA community. Professional regulatory organizations will also be interested in the Supreme Court's comments on the role of regulators and the deference owed to regulator's academic accreditation decisions.

Trinity Western University (TWU) is a private Christian university located in British Columbia. All students and faculty at TWU must follow a religious-based code of conduct, known as a "covenant", that allows sexual intimacy only between a man and a woman who are married. TWU had long sought to open a law school. This proved to be contentious in the legal community due to the covenant.

The Law Society of British Columbia and the Law Society of Ontario decided not to accredit TWU's proposed law school, a decision that fell within their role as the gatekeepers to the profession. The Law Societies' decisions were challenged on the grounds that the decisions violated freedom of religion and other rights protected by the Charter.

After proceeding through the superior courts of British Columbia and Ontario, the issue before the Supreme Court of Canada was whether the Law Society of British Columbia's and the Law Society of Ontario's decisions not to accredit TWU's proposed law school contravened the Charter.

The majority of the Court stated that it was required to determine if the Law Societies' decisions were reasonable and, that to be considered reasonable, the decisions had to strike a proportionate balance between the limitation on the religious rights of TWU and its community and the Law Societies' statutory objective.

In determining that TWU's proposed law school should not be accredited, the Law Societies had concluded that TWU's covenant imposed inequitable barriers on entry to the school and that this also imposed inequitable barriers on entry to the profession, which risked decreasing diversity in the bar. The Law Societies concluded that approving the law school would also harm LGBTQIA individuals. For these reasons, approval of the school would undermine the public interest in the administration of justice.

The majority of the Supreme Court concluded it was reasonable for the Law Societies to conclude that promoting equality by ensuring equal access to the legal profession, supporting diversity within the bar, and preventing harm to LGBTQIA law students were valid means by which they could pursue their overarching statutory duty of protecting the public interest. The "public interest" is a broad concept and what it requires depends on the particular circumstances. Accordingly, it was appropriate to consider these issues in determining the requirements for admission to the legal profession, including whether a law school should be accredited. The Court observed that the Law Societies were entitled to deference in determining how the public interest mandate would be furthered as such deference reflects legislative intent, acknowledges the law society's institutional expertise, follows from the breadth of the "public interest", and promotes the independence of the bar.

The Court next had to decide whether it was reasonable for the Law Societies to deny approval of TWU's law school given the impact the denial had on the freedom of religion.

Since the decision to deny approval was a discretionary administrative decision that engaged the Charter, the Law Societies' decisions were reviewed based on the administrative law framework set out in Doré v Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, and Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 12. Under this framework, an administrative decision will be reasonable if it reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter right or value with the statutory mandate. This approach recognizes that an administrative decision-maker, exercising a discretionary power under a home statute, typically brings expertise to the balancing of a Charter protection with the statutory objectives at stake. The Court observed that deference is warranted when determining whether the decision reflects a proportionate balance.

The majority of the Court found the decisions of the Law Societies to refuse to accredit TWU's law school struck a proportionate balance and were reasonable. The majority also observed that the benefits of protecting the public interest, including maintaining equal access to and diversity in the legal profession and preventing the risk of significant harm to the LGBTQIA community, were important. The majority also noted that the limitation on religious rights was relatively minor, as the Law Societies did not stop anyone from following their own religious beliefs and instead only prevented the beliefs from being imposed on students of the law school. Finally, the majority noted that the Law Societies had only two choices: either approve or not approve the schools, thereby limiting the balancing.

Beyond their recognition of the importance of diversity and equality, the majority decisions offer important insights for professional regulators, including:

  1. A professional regulator is entitled to deference when it is determining how to best fulfill its role of protecting the public interest. In the context of an accreditation decision, a determination of the public interest may include promoting diversity, removing inequitable barriers, and reviewing educational programs to ensure the values of profession are not harmed by the program. Further, the "public interest" is broad and may vary based on the circumstances. This recognizes that regulators, as the body entrusted with the self-regulation of a profession, are in a unique position to determine what is important to the profession and to the public it serves.
     
  2. Deference will be afforded to professional regulators even when the regulator's decision engages the Charter and important considerations such as religious liberty and equality for the LGBTQIA community. The Supreme Court stated that a regulator is in the best position to balance a Charter right or value with the regulator's statutory objective. Further, when an administrative decision engages the Charter, reasonableness and proportionality become synonymous. This does not mean that the administrative decision-maker must choose the option that least limits the Charter right or value. The question for the reviewing court is always whether the decision falls within a range of reasonable outcomes. This affords regulators and their tribunals significant authority to address and oversee all aspects of the profession, including Charter rights and values.
     
  3. A professional regulator is not required to provide formal reasons for all types of decision-making. The majority of the Supreme Court stated there was no requirement for the Law Societies to give reasons for the accreditation decision and proceeded to examine the record to determine the rationale for the decision. This is a significant recognition by the Supreme Court that some types of administrative decisions are not required to be explained with detailed reasons, even when significant considerations such as the public interest and Charter rights and values are engaged.  

The Supreme Court of Canada's decisions represent another high-water mark in the recognition of the deference that should be afford to professional regulators in light of their expertise and the broad mandate entrusted to them by the legislature. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Devry Smith Frank LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Devry Smith Frank LLP
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions