Canada: A Win For Equality Rights: Trinity Western v. LSUC

On June 15, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered its highly anticipated decisions in Trinity Western University, et al. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, and Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western. By a 7-2 majority in both cases, the Court affirmed that the Ontario and B.C. law societies' (the "Law Societies") decisions not to accredit Trinity Western University's proposed law school were reasonable and represented a proportionate balance between the Charter rights of equality and religious freedom. The SCC endorsed the Law Societies' conclusions that they could not accredit a proposed law school that condones a mandatory covenant that directly discriminates against individuals and groups based on sexual orientation, gender, marital status and religion.


This case dates back to January 2014, when Trinity Western University (TWU), a private evangelical Christian university, asked the LSUC to accredit its proposed law school. The crux of the case stems from TWU's admissions policy, which requires that all students, faculty and staff sign and abide by a Community Covenant based on evangelical Christian notions of Biblical teaching and morality. The Covenant prohibits, among other things, sexual intimacy outside of "marriage between one man and one woman." TWU would deny admission to any student who refused to sign the Covenant.

In April 2014, after considerable and thoughtful deliberations, the LSUC's decided, by resolution of its Benchers, to deny accreditation to TWU's proposed law school because of its mandatory Covenant. TWU and a graduate of TWU's undergraduate program who would have chosen to attend TWU's proposed law school, applied for judicial review, seeking an order declaring that the LSUC's decision was unauthorized and otherwise invalid and approving TWU's application for accreditation. Among other things, TWU argued that the LSUC violated the right to freedom of religion in section 2(a) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Decision of the Ontario Divisional Court

The Ontario Divisional Court dismissed the application for judicial review – confirming the LSUC's jurisdiction to act as it did and determining that LSUC's decision was a reasonable one. The Divisional Court held that the Covenant operated in a discriminatory fashion by requiring individuals to adhere to a particular view and belief system in order to attend TWU. The Divisional Court found that the LSUC's decision not to accredit TWU's proposed law school infringed the appellants' freedom of religion but that the decision was justifiable because the LSUC engaged in a proportionate balancing of the Charter rights and values in play (freedom of religion and equality) and reached a reasonable decision in not accrediting TWU. The Court reasoned that TWU was able to promote its beliefs without coercing others into forsaking their true beliefs in order to have an equal opportunity to a legal education.

The Decision of the Court of Appeal of Ontario

The Court of Appeal also dismissed the appeal, finding that the LSUC's decision to deny accreditation reflected a reasonable balancing of the Charter rights engaged with the statutory objectives of the LSUC, such as ensuring equal access to legal education. In considering TWU's request for a unique and significant public benefit (namely accreditation), the Court of Appeal concluded that the LSUC had to take into account the fact that the Covenant discriminates, and that it had to make its decision about accreditation in light of human rights, Charter rights and Charter values. The Court of Appeal endorsed the LSUC's conclusion that the Covenant could not be countenanced as it is "deeply discriminatory to the LGBTQ community, and it hurts".

The Supreme Court of Canada Ruling

TWU was granted leave to appeal to the SCC, and in a two-day hearing in December 2017, the SCC heard arguments from lawyers for TWU, the law societies of British Columbia and Ontario, as well as from a record number of intervenors, including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, who intervened in support of the LSUC's decision.

In a 7-2 ruling, the majority of the SCC upheld the LSUC's decision to deny accreditation to TWU's proposed law school. The SCC acknowledged that the LSUC is tasked with, among other things, regulating the legal profession in Ontario, ensuring standards of professionalism and competence among lawyers, and fulfilling its various functions according to its duty to protect the public interest. It was clear to the majority of the Court that the LSUC was entitled to conclude that "equal access to the legal profession, diversity within the bar, and preventing harm to the LGBTQ law students were all within the scope of its duty to uphold the public interest in the accreditation context."

The majority of the SCC held that the LSUC's decision to deny accreditation limited the religious freedom of TWU's religious community; however, the decision was reasonable under the Dore/Loyola framework, as it reasonably balanced the severity of the interference with the benefits of the LSUC's statutory objectives. While noting that the Charter right to freedom of religion was engaged in this case, the majority of the SCC held that "it is inimical to the integrity of the legal profession to limit access on the basis of personal characteristics. As a public actor, the LSUC has an overarching interest in protecting the values of equality and human rights in carrying out its functions."

"The LSUC did not limit religious freedom to a significant extent" the majority of the Court held, reasoning that the LSUC's decision only interfered with TWU's ability to operate a law school governed by the mandatory Covenant, which is of minor significance as the Covenant is not "absolutely required to study law in a Christian environment" and "attending a Christian law school is preferred, not necessary, for prospective TWU law students". The majority of the SCC clearly recognized the extent to which the LSUC's decision significantly advanced the LSUC's statutory objectives of ensuring equal access to and diversity in the legal profession, and held that "the LSUC's decision means that TWU's community members cannot impose those religious beliefs on fellow law students, since they have an inequitable impact and can cause significant harm."

The majority concluded that the LSUC chose an interpretation of the public interest, which "mandates access to law schools based on merit and diversity, rather than exclusionary religious practices", and that ultimately, the LSUC's decision "prevents concrete, not abstract, harms to the LGBTQ people and to the public in general."

Our Involvement

Alan D'Silva and Alexandra Urbanski of Stikeman Elliott LLP were counsel for the intervenor, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which intervened in support of the LSUC's position in the case of Trinity Western University, et al. v. Law Society of Upper Canada.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Devry Smith Frank LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Devry Smith Frank LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions