Canada: Alberta/British Columbia Joint Expert Panel On Pension Standards Report - Part 2

This article is part of a series: Click Alberta/British Columbia Joint Expert Panel On Pension Standards Report - Part One for the previous article.


Defined Benefit Funding Rules

Recommendation 8.1.1-A Pension standards should continue to require both solvency and going-concern valuations, with reasonable requirements that protect benefit security while not being overly onerous for sponsors, as further described below:

Going-concern funding requirements

Recommendation 8.1.1-B Current going-concern funding rules should continue to apply and be determined by the plan actuary and the plan sponsor, based on the plan's funding policy (see also Section 7.1 "Governance standards" above), actuarial standards of practice and regulatory requirements.

Solvency funding requirements

Recommendation 8.1.1-C Solvency funding rules should be developed on the following bases:

  • Asset valuations should be based on pure market measures (with no smoothing of assets).
  • Liability valuations should be prepared on a pure wind-up basis, assuming annuity purchases for persons receiving or eligible for immediate pensions and termination (commuted) values otherwise. Benefits provided at the discretion of the administrator/trustee/plan sponsor should not be included in the valuation.
  • Assumptions should be based on the actuarial standards for calculating commuted values that would be adopted in the legislation. (See also Recommendation 6.1-G above.) No additional margins or provisions for adverse deviation (PfADs) should be required, other than those already implicit in the commuted value.
  • Amortization of any solvency deficiency should continue to be over five years; however, assets to satisfy the deficiency could include letters of credit or assets in a PSF. (See Recommendations 8.1.2-A and 8.1.2-C below.)
  • Solvency valuations should be required annually unless, at any valuation, plan solvency was 110 percent or greater, in which case the next valuation would not be required for three years.

Ownership and Use of Surplus

Pension Security Funds

Recommendation 8.1.2-A Pension standards legislation should permit the establishment of a "pension security fund" (PSF) that would be separate from but complementary to the regular pension fund, on the following bases:

  • Contributions required to meet going-concern funding
  • obligations should be forwarded to the regular pension fund as under current practice.
  • Contributions required to meet solvency obligations over and above the going-concern obligations could be forwarded to the PSF.
  • The PSF should be:
  • tax sheltered, held separate from the sponsor's assets and protected from creditors;
  • accessible to the plan sponsor with regulator consent:
  • as long as the sum of the regular pension fund plus the PSF (after access by the sponsor) exceeds the funds required to meet solvency requirements, with a five percent cushion, and the withdrawal is spread over a five-year period (20 percent of the excess per year)
  • based on a current valuation within one year of the most recent valuation date
  • but only if an actuarial certification that there has not been a material change since the valuation date is provided
  • returned to the plan sponsor on plan windup, to" the extent not needed to meet benefit obligations and windup expenses.
  • The PSF could also hold voluntary sponsor contributions greater than those required to meet solvency obligations, to assist in managing contribution volatility.
  • The PSF could be structured as a trust, insurance contract or other financial funding medium acceptable under the federal Income Tax Act. (See Section 10.1 "Income tax rules" below.)
  • The governments should consult with the CIA regarding detailed rules on PSFs (including certification requirements and frequency of valuations).

Contribution holidays/surplus withdrawals – regular fund

Recommendation 8.1.2-B Contribution holidays in relation to, and surplus withdrawals from the regular pension fund would be permitted, on the following bases:

  • Contribution holidays should be permitted unless explicitly prohibited in the plan terms.
  • Surplus withdrawal from the regular fund should continue to be permitted subject to regulator consent and only if the plan permits it or the members consent.
  • Contribution holidays and surplus withdrawals should be restricted to ensure that they do not reduce surplus assets to less than five percent of the value of the liabilities as of the most recent review date.
  • The financial position of the plan should be required to be updated (based on changes in interest rates and actual investment returns) before the withdrawal can be made or the contribution holiday can commence.
  • Both contribution holidays and surplus withdrawals should be required to be spread over five years (20 percent of the excess per year).
  • For the holiday or the withdrawal to continue after the first year, the financial position of the plan, the calculation of the five percent buffer and the amount of the surplus available should be required to be updated annually in a similar manner.
  • Where a PSF had been established, a contribution holiday should be permitted in the regular pension fund:
  • to the extent that funds are in excess of going-concern requirements; and
  • as long as the sum of the regular pension fund plus the PSF (after the contribution holiday) exceeds the funds needed under the solvency valuation based on a 105 percent threshold.

See Section 10.1 for recommendations relating to income tax limits on surplus assets.

Letters of credit

Recommendation 8.1.2-C Letters of credit should continue to be permitted for use in securing solvency deficiency obligations.

Legacy surplus issues

Recommendation 8.1.2-D Plans with "legacy" surplus issues should be permitted to "ring-fence" such issues by allowing the older plans to be frozen and new plans to be established with clear contractual provisions relating to surplus issues to "wrap around" the frozen plan, on the following bases:

  • The terms and conditions of the new plan with respect to surplus use and withdrawal should be subject to contract law.
  • The existing plans, whose surplus use and withdrawal rules were governed by trust law, should be permitted to be closed to new entrants and frozen with respect to accruals of further service and recognition of salary increases.
  • Recognition of vesting and other entitlements in the old plan should be required for the purpose of establishing benefit entitlements in the new plan, and vice versa.
  • Benefits in the new plan should include recognition of salary increases with respect to service accrued in the frozen plan.
  • There should be no requirement to wind up the "legacy" plan, but rather it would continue and form part of the members' ultimate benefits from the two combined plans, continuing to pay out benefits until all liabilities are discharged.

Utilization o fPlan Assets

General rules

Recommendation 8.1.3-A The governments should adopt the following principles in the legislation for asset utilization:

  • Established property rights to surplus that is in a plan at termination should not be tampered with.
  • At all times if a pension plan sponsor and members want to define their "deal" regarding surplus ownership and utilization in some other fashion, they should not be precluded from doing so.
  • Surplus in an ongoing plan should be available to the plan sponsor for contribution holidays unless the plan explicitly prohibits it.
  • Withdrawal of surplus by the plan sponsor should take place only if the plan permits it or the employees agree; the withdrawal should be subject to regulator approval.
  • Surplus in new "wrap-around" plans and in PSFs should be dealt with as described in the Recommendations under Section 8.1.2 above.

The governments should build upon these principles as the body of common law evolves with subsequent court decisions.

Partial plan terminations

Recommendation 8.1.3-B The following rules should apply with respect to surplus use and distribution on partial plan terminations:

  • Vesting of benefits should be automatic for all members affected by a partial termination but vesting should not include a right to surplus assets unless the plan specifically provides for it.
  • Partial terminations should continue to be required, subject to the criteria in the current legislation (termination of an identifiable group, etc.).
  • Administrators should be required to notify the regulator of a plan termination rather than being required to file a special report; the actuary of a DB plan should also report the event on a subsequent regular valuation.

Plan mergers and divisions

Recommendation 8.1.3-C The following rules should apply to plan mergers and divisions:

  • A plan should be permitted, but not required, to transfer a proportion of the surplus equal to the ratio of the liabilities for the transferred members to the total of the plan's liabilities.
  • The money transferred into the transferee plan should be allowed to be used according to the terms of the new plan.

Plan expenses

Recommendation 8.1.3-D Plan expenses should be payable from the plan fund unless the plan text specifically provides otherwise. This default rule would supplement the current standard requiring all plan texts to contain a provision indicating how plan expenses will be paid. It would address problems in old plans with unclear or nonexistent wording.

DB/DC contribution holidays

Recommendation 8.1.3-F Where a plan has been converted from DB to DC leaving a legacy DB provision in place within the plan, surplus arising with respect to the DB provision should be available for employer contribution holidays in the DC portion of the plan as long as the DB and DC segments are part of the same trust (to the extent that the plan assets are subject to a trust).

Specified Contribution Target Benefit Plans (SCTB)

Funding rules for SCTBs

Recommendation 8.2.1-A A new category should be created in the pension legislation for funding and disclosure for single and multi-employer plans with similar characteristics, called specified contribution target benefit plans. The essential characteristics of such a plan are:

  • Contributions are limited to specified employer and employee contributions ("specified" by the parties to the deal, whether through a collective bargaining agreement or another method).
  • Employer(s) are limited in their liability to providing the specified contributions.
  • There is a formula benefit set out in the plan document but it is subject to reduction if funding is not sufficient and can therefore be considered a target benefit.

Recommendation 8.2.1-B There should be a single funding test for the purpose of setting minimum funding standards. It should be a "going-concern plus" test:

  • Going-concern liabilities should be estimated using "best estimates" of long-term going-concern assumptions, following generally accepted actuarial practice.
  • The actuary should have to demonstrate that the plan has an appropriate PfAD. The variables at issue could include, but not necessarily be limited to:
  • distribution of liabilities between active and deferred/retired members,
  • degree of mismatch between assets and liabilities, and
  • variability of hours worked

The greater the volatility of the above variables, the greater the PfAD needed. The result would be a target going-concern funded ratio of 100 percent at minimum, rising with the degree of PfAD.

  • The funding rules should either specify the magnitude of the PfAD or incorporate actuarial standards addressing the same issue. As actuarial standards are yet to be developed in this area, the CIA should be asked to develop such standards or at least to advise legislators on appropriate PfAD standards.

Recommendation 8.2.1-C To determine the size of the PfAD and the prescription for remediating problems, the funding rules should require that stress testing be performed as part of the actuarial valuation:

  • The standards should require the actuary to perform all appropriate scenario tests which must include both stochastic tests, and specified deterministic scenarios.
  • Standards for stochastic testing should have to state what level of statistical confidence would be required.
  • Where the plan would be vulnerable to the failure or withdrawal of one or more employers, that scenario should be included in the stress testing. Proportionate and appropriate protection should be factored in when there is an apparent significant chance of wind-up.
  • It is important that the actuarial profession be engaged to develop stress testing metrics. Actuarial standards do not currently exist in this area; therefore, the CIA should be asked to create such standards. If the profession declines to create such standards, the legislation should impose them based on advice from actuarial consultants.

Recommendation 8.2.1-D If going-concern liabilities plus any necessary PfAD are greater than assets, deficiencies should be required to be eliminated by increasing contributions and/or reducing benefits so as to restore the plan to the target funded ratio. The remediation should be required to be achieved with regular, consistent and timely treatment:

  • The plan should have to demonstrate that contributions would be sufficient to amortize unfunded liabilities over 15 years or the "expected average remaining service life", whichever is less. The other rules relating to unfunded liabilities would continue to apply:
  • Once identified, an unfunded liability should be required to be amortized in that length of time or less and should not be allowed to be combined with more recently established unfunded liabilities so as to extend the amortization period beyond the original maximum period.
  • Gains should be required to be applied to the oldest-established unfunded liability first, with the result that either the payments would be lowered or eliminated, or the same payments would continue but the unfunded liability would be amortized more quickly.
  • If funding levels indicated above are not met, the " plan's funding status should be required to be adjusted immediately by contribution increases, changes in plan design (e.g. benefit reductions or increased eligibility requirements) or a combination of those. The trustees should have the primary responsibility to exercise even-handedness in making any changes in plan design.

Benefit improvements for SCTBs

Recommendation 8.2.2-A The legislation should also require that a reasonable method be used for costing benefit improvements: benefit improvements should be valued on the same going-concern-plus basis as required for the minimum funding standards.

Recommendation 8.2.2-B No benefit improvement should be permitted unless there is at least a 100 percent going-concern-plus funded ratio and no benefit improvement should be allowed that would reduce the plan's funded status below the fund's target ratio.

Recommendation 8.2.2-C To provide more flexibility in plan design, temporary benefit improvements should be permitted, subject to the general limitation that there must be a going-concern-plus surplus. These improvements must be accompanied by full disclosure to plan members of the temporary nature of the benefit and who is entitled to receive it. Such improvements should be subject to Recommendation 8.2.2-B limiting benefit improvements.

Valuations for SCTBs

Recommendation 8.2.3-A The current standards for frequency of valuations should be retained. The regulator should continue to have discretion to require more rigourous and/or more frequent valuations and/or additional stress testing as part of risk-based monitoring.

Recommendation 8.2.3-B In any SCTB plan where the probability of wind-up is higher, the actuary should be required to take into account the wind-up scenario in setting the going-concern-plus assumptions. The more probable the windup scenario the closer the going-concern-plus valuation should be to a wind-up valuation.

Recommendation 8.2.3-C The valuation filed with the regulator should state the target funded ratio and how it was calculated, including making the PfAD explicit.

Recommendation 8.2.3-D The valuation should be required to include an estimate of the amount that would be required to settle all liabilities at that point in time (settlement valuation), and state the settlement ratio.

Transfer values

Recommendation 8.2.5-A An individual's termination benefit should be valued using the same assumptions as were used in the most recent valuation, that is, on a going-concern-plus basis.

Recommendation 8.2.5-B The maximum termination benefit any individual may receive should be 100 percent of the going-concern liability. Even if the current funded ratio is over 100 percent to meet the plan's target funded ratio, the maximum payment should be 100 percent. If the ratio is less than 100 percent, terminating members who elect to remove their funds should receive a pro-rated amount, based on the funded ratio at that time. There should be no later "catch-up" payment to bring their payment to 100 percent of the target benefit.

SCTB governance

Recommendation 8.2.6-A Our recommendations relating to governance standards in Section 7.1, and trustee/fiduciary education in Section 7.1.1, should be adopted to complement these funding rules. We do not endorse any single governance structure as the most suitable.

Recommendation 8.2.6-B As indicated in Recommendation 7.1-C, a funding policy should be a mandatory element of the governance policy for these plans. Some of the special requirements related to funding policies for SCTBs should include:

  • There should be a policy on benefit increases.
  • The legislation should require that the actuary, in the actuarial report, opine that there is nothing in the funding policy that is inconsistent with sound actuarial practice for the particular plan.

Recommendation 8.2.6-C The governing fiduciary should be required to certify that the plan has been managed in accordance with its governance policy, funding policy and investment policy.

Recommendation 8.2.6-D There should be a requirement for an annual assessment by the governing fiduciary of the plan's administration, its compliance with legislated minimum standards, governance, funding and investment policies, and the performance of the trustees, administrative staff and significant external professionals. The assessment should be in writing and available to the regulator upon request, but should not be required to be filed.

Recommendation 8.2.6-E Governing fiduciaries should be required to obtain the education and training required in order to properly meet their responsibilities. (See also Recommendation 7.1.1-B.)

Recommendation 8.2.6-F Governing fiduciaries should be required to ensure that those with administrative responsibilities with respect to the plan are appropriately trained.


Locking In

Recommendation 9.1-A Unlocking of funds subject to pension standards legislation in Alberta and British Columbia should only be permitted on the following bases:

  • Pension funds should remain locked in so long as the individual is still an active member of the plan.
  • SCTBs should retain the ability to set rules regarding when an individual is or is not a terminated member.
  • It should be optional whether a plan permits unlocking.
  • If a plan permits unlocking, individuals who are at least age 50 should be permitted to unlock either 25 percent or 50 percent of their entitlements, on a one-time basis, at or after termination of employment. The unlocked amount could be transferred to a non-locked in RRSP, while the locked in portion could be transferred to a LIRA or locked-in RRSP.
  • If the plan is silent on unlocking, then 50 percent unlocking at age 50 or over at the member's election should be the default.
  • There should be no change to the existing rule that plans may disallow portability within 10 years before normal retirement.
  • For transition purposes, individuals subject to the current Alberta legislation who are age 50 or over at the time the new legislation is enacted should be "grandfathered" under that rule regardless of the option selected for the plan going forward.
  • There should be no change to the existing unlocking rules (subject to harmonization) with respect to:
  • shortened life expectancy;
  • non-residency in Canada; and
  • small amounts.
  • Financial hardship unlocking should be applicable in both provinces using the Alberta model.


Income Tax Rules

Recommendation 10.1-A The governments should actively advocate that the federal government change various tax rules that impact the pension system, including:

  • raising the maximum contribution/benefit limits (to be more competitive with other major industrialized economies with which we compete for human resource talent)
  • raising the maximum funding limits for DB plans to encourage more generous funding of such plans and improve benefit security, by allowing surpluses of up to 25 percent, except for Individual Pension Plans, where the current ten percent maximum excess would remain
  • advocating any changes required to federal tax and bankruptcy and insolvency laws to support establishment of the Pension Security Fund
  • updating the rules applicable to the maximum transfer values for DB to DC plans to allow larger amounts to be transferred tax-free
  • making the tax rules flexible enough to accommodate new plan designs that meet the principles of general application under next-generation pension standards legislation
  • allowing contributions by employees to broad-based plans to be deductible where their employer opts not to participate (See Sections 6.3 and 11)
  • allowing self-employed individuals to make contributions to a registered pension plan

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Issues

Recommendation 10.4-A There should not be a pension benefit guarantee fund established in Alberta and British Columbia.

Recommendation 10.4-B The governments should encourage the federal government to extend the "super priority" secured creditor status to all due but unpaid contributions, including solvency deficiency or unfunded liability special payments, but not to extend such status to such amounts that are unamortized but not yet due.

Recommendation 10.4-C The governments should encourage the federal government to provide the PSF with the same treatment under federal bankruptcy and insolvency legislation as applies to the regular pension fund of a pension plan. (See also Section 8.1.1 "DB funding rules" above.)

Recommendation 10.4-D The deemed trust rules in pension standards legislation need to be clarified to ensure that monies held for pension contributions are treated in the same manner as earned but unpaid wages under provincial employment standards legislation and, in situations other than bankruptcy, are not available to satisfy other creditors.


Recommendation 11-A The governments should establish a Steering Committee made up of experts in pension plan administration, governance and investment to examine the feasibility of establishing a multi-employer pension plan available to all employers and employees working in our provinces. The Steering Committee should have a mandate not only to make specific plan design recommendations but also to suggest the means by which key participants (especially employers and employees) in the ABC Plan operation would work together to ensure their buy-in to the ABC Plan's purposes and objectives. We also encourage the Steering Committee to consult with other provinces who may be considering similar plans.

Recommendation 11-B The ABC Plan design should be based on a simple DC formula with, generally, matching employer and employee contribution rates. Although the Panel recommends an entry level participation rate of a minimum of three percent of employee's earnings, the Plan design should be flexible enough to allow both employers and employees to make contributions without matching contributions from each other in order to encourage increased savings by all ABC Plan participants.

Recommendation 11-C All employers and workers, including self-employed individuals earning employment or self-employment income in either Alberta or British Columbia, should be eligible to participate in the Plan. All employers and employees should be automatically enrolled in the ABC Plan but the employer and/or their employees should be allowed to opt out of participation if they so choose. Employees whose employer has opted out should still be automatically enrolled without employer contributions unless they choose to opt out. Self-employed individuals in our provinces should also be encouraged to participate in the Plan. Auto-enrolment is not recommended – rather, participation by self-employed individuals should be on an opt-in basis.

Recommendation 11-F Governance of the ABC Plan should be at arm's length from government. There are several models of pension governance that the governments could consider.

Recommendation 11-H Administration of the Plan should be at arm's length from government. The board of governors would ultimately be responsible for deciding how best to structure the administration of the Plan.

Recommendation 11-I The Panel does not recommend that employers or employees contributing to the ABC Plan have any investment choice. Rather, the Panel recommends investment of the Plan assets would be subject to the policy direction of the board of governors.

Recommendation 11-J The Plan's design could include auto-annuitization, spreading out annuity purchases over time to minimize longevity risk and retirement end-date sensitivities which would help mitigate risks of market volatility.

Recommendation 11-L Contributions to the ABC Plan should be locked in similar to the locking-in rules applicable to any registered pension plan in our provinces.

Recommendation 11-M Vesting of employer contributions to the ABC Plan should be immediate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

This article is part of a series: Click Alberta/British Columbia Joint Expert Panel On Pension Standards Report - Part One for the previous article.
Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.