Canada: Explaining The Proposed Revisions To The Divorce Act (Canada)

Today in Ottawa, Federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould introduced a bill that would see significant changes to Canada's Divorce Act. The goals of Bill C-78 are to put the children first, better address family violence, and make the justice system more accessible and efficient for family matters. The proposed changes would also bring the Divorce Act more in line with BC's Family Law Act. This blog looks at a few of the proposed changes in comparison to BC's FLA.

Best Interests of the Child

If Bill C-78 is adopted, the Divorce Act would no longer use the terms "custody" and "access," adopting instead "parenting time," "decision-making responsibility," and "contact" to focus more on the child's needs and realities, terms which have been adopted under the provincial FLA already. The new terms are also meant to be more neutral in tone and focused on resolutions rather than provocation of conflict between parents. In granting orders for parenting time or contact, courts now have a non-exhaustive list of factors to consider to determine what is in the best interests of a child. The list of factors is by and large comparable to the list in BC's FLA with a couple of notable additions. The Divorce Act includes these two factors in its definition of best interests of the child, not included in the FLA:

  1. each spouse's willingness to support the development and maintenance of the child's relationship with the other spouse; and,
  2. the ability and willingness of each person in respect of whom the order would apply to communicate and cooperate, in particular with one another, on matters affecting the child.

The Divorce Act would also maintain its maximum contact rule, another difference from BC's FLA. Under the Divorce Act, courts are to seek to give effect to the principle that a child should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the child's best interests. The two best interest factors and this maximum contact rule indicate that the federal government may not be wholly embracing the idea of putting the children first to the extent the FLA has. These factors and rule may seem to put the parent's interests ahead of the child's when determining interests and parenting time. It will be important to see how courts interpret and apply these provisions before concluding whether they are, in fact, marked distinctions from BC's regime and how the statutory implementation will affect the child and their inherent best interests.

Family Violence

One factor for determining the best interests of the child is family violence. Family violence is defined in the FLA but would have an even broader definition in the new Divorce Act. In BC's FLA, family violence includes physical abuse, sexual abuse, attempts of physical or sexual abuse, psychological or emotional abuse (including threats to other persons, pets, or property; unreasonably restricting a family member's financial or personal autonomy; stalking; and damaging property). The proposed changes to the Divorce Act include all of those factors plus additional factors such has the failure to provide the necessaries of life and the killing or harming of an animal. Bill C-78 also refers generally to "financial abuse" which may be broader than BC's "unreasonable restrictions on, or prevention of, a family member's financial or personal autonomy."

Under BC's FLA, determining the best interests of a child looks at the impact of family violence on the child's safety, whether the violence is directed toward the child or another family member, and whether the actions of the person responsible for the violence indicate he or she cannot adequately care for the child. The proposed changes to the Divorce Act focus on similar factors, but the precise wording of the provisions differ quite significantly. For example, in the FLA, the court is to determine "whether any psychological or emotional abuse constitutes, or is evidence of, a pattern of coercive and controlling behavior directed at a family member" (section 38(d)). The new Divorce Act, on the contrary, uses the language of "whether there is a pattern of coercive and controlling behavior in relation to a family member". These slight differences in syntax may not turn out to matter all that much. But they are at least worth noting at this stage.


The bill also proposes significant changes to the law on relocation. Similar to BC's FLA, the Divorce Act has slightly different procedures for a parent who wants to move with a child depending on whether or not there's an existing order or agreement about parenting time.

In BC, where there is no parenting order or agreement, the court has to determine whether the move is in the best interests of the child at the outset and has to also consider the reasons for the move.

If there is an order or agreement, the applicable law depends on how much parenting time the parents have. If the parents have substantially equal parenting time, the relocating parent has to establish that the move is in the best interests of the child, prove that the move is in good faith, and propose reasonable arrangements with the child's other parent or guardians, all of which is subjective. If the parents don't have substantially equal parenting time, the relocating guardian simply has to prove the elements of good faith and reasonable arrangements; if she or he does, the move will be presumed to be in the child's best interests.

The proposed sections 16.93(1) and 16.93(2) of the Divorce Act operate slightly differently with respect to relocation. First, if there is an order or agreement, and if the parents don't have substantially equal parenting time, the non-relocating parent has to prove that the move is not in the child's best interests in order to prevent the relocation. Essentially, the court will presume the move is in the child's best interests until convinced otherwise. If there is an order or agreement and the parents do have substantially equal parenting time, the relocating parent has to prove that the move is in the child's best interests; again, this is a subjective test. A key difference in these proposed changes is that in order to determine what's in the child's best interests, courts will have to consider the reasons for the move, the impact of the move on the child, and other factors in addition to the general best interests of the child factors. Essentially, BC's elements of good faith and reasonable arrangements are brought within the definition of best interests of the child for the purposes of relocation under the proposed changes to the Divorce Act, making the test more all-encompassing. Similar to the discussion on family violence, this may be a distinction without a difference; only time will tell.

Second, if there is no order or agreement, the burden simply falls to "the parties to the proceeding" to prove whether the move is in the child's best interests. One of the criticisms of BC's approach has been that it's unclear what to make of an interim order or agreement. The proposed changes to the Divorce Act do little to address this, indicating that a court may decide to apply sections 16.93(1) and (2) to an interim order or not.

Out-of-Court Processes

Bill C-78 would require lawyers, mediators, and other family law professionals to promote out-of-court dispute resolution processes unless those processes wouldn't be appropriate in the circumstances. This requirement is analogous to the one found in BC's FLA and is in line with the goal of taking family disputes out of the court system which is adversarial by nature and placing them in the hands of the parties with the assistance of a certified professional. This would make settlements more family focused, keeping the family "together."


The proposed changes to Canada's Divorce Act represent a significant development for family law. The Divorce Act would use more neutral language such as "parenting time" instead of custody and enumerates factors for courts to consider when determining family violence or the best interests of the child. These steps that put children first and seek to minimize conflict as much as possible represent a much-needed update to the Act.

— Articling student Alison Colpitts co-authored this article with Chantal M. Cattermole

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions