Canada: Liquidated Damages

Last Updated: November 20 2008
Article by Dennis Schmidt and Mark Facundo

Assuming a construction contract is in place, it is not uncommon to find a provision that provides for payment of a fixed amount, likely called "liquidated damages", should the contractor fail to complete by an appointed date or within a period specified for completion.

The issue that arises when considering to include such a provision in the construction contract is whether the amount specified is a true assessment or "genuine pre-estimate" of damages suffered by and, therefore, payable to the owner by the contractor as a result of contractor's failure to complete, or whether the amount is in fact a penalty.

In many cases it is difficult to determine at the pre-contracting stage what the owner's potential losses or damages may be and are triggered by the contractor's failure to complete. What is clear is that only those provisions that reflect a "genuine pre-estimate" of damages to be suffered by the owner on breach by the contractor are enforceable.

In other words, those provisions that provide for a payment of penalty by the contractor that are excessive and beyond the actual losses of the owner are generally void and unenforceable. In those instances, the owner's relief is a claim for damages flowing from any loss actually suffered as a result of the contractor's breach.

The danger is generating a provision that ultimately produces recovery for the owner that is far in excess of the actual losses. In that regard, any scenario that puts the owner in a position to recover more than their actual losses or damages incurred will likely result in the provision being struck down as being a penalty regardless of the parties' intentions.

In Canada, the leading case on liquidated damages is an old decision from the U.K. Courts1, which came up with the following as "criteria" or factors to consider when addressing "liquidated damages" provisions:

  • The use of the words "penalty" or "liquidated damages" in the contract is not conclusive or determinative of whether it is in fact one or the other. The Court must find out whether the payment stipulated is in truth a penalty or liquidated damages. In other words, the parties' attempt to call it "liquidated damages" is not conclusive and the Court can still determine that it is a penalty.
  • The essence of a "penalty" is a payment of money stipulated as against the offending party; the essence of "liquidated damages" is a genuine covenanted preestimate of damages to the innocent party. The key is to attempt to estimate what actual loss would be caused by the breach by the offending party and further, whether it is fair and reasonable.
  • The question whether a sum stipulated is penalty or liquidated damages is a question of construction to be decided upon the terms and inherent circumstances of each particular contract, judged at the time of the making of the contract, not at the time of the breach.
  • To assist this task of construction of such provisions various tests have been suggested:
  • It will be held to be penalty if the sum stipulated for is extravagant and unconscionable in amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach.

  • It will be held to be a penalty if the breach consists only in paying a sum of money, and the sum stipulated is a sum greater than the sum which ought to have been paid (i.e. greater than the actual losses of the innocent party).

  • There is a presumption that it is penalty when a single lump sum is made payable by way of compensation, on the occurrence of one or more or all of several events, some of which may occasion serious and others but trifling damage.

The time for assessment or construction of the provision as either a "genuine pre-estimate" of damages or a penalty is as at the time of the contract. In other words, if it is a genuine preestimate of damages or losses of the owner at the time the contract is entered, then it will likely be valid and enforceable.

Likewise, if the contractor is arguing that it is an unfair provision and it is a penalty, the proper time to assess that unfairness must be at the time of entering in to the contract. One would expect that this assessment would favour the owner on the argument that an experienced party such as the contractor would have assessed whether the inclusion of such at provision at the time of pre-contracting was fair and, if not, would either have negotiated against inclusion or would not have entered into the contract at all.

Failing that, the contractor would argue that the provision is not a genuine pre-estimate of damages and the amount expected to pay is greatly in excess of what the actual losses, if at all, have incurred to the owner.

Accordingly, rather than a lump specified sum as a payment for delay or liquidated damages by the contractor upon breach of the contract, the practice has evolved to a provision that provides for payment of a set per diem for delay in completing or failing to deliver the project by the appointed completion date.

However, wording a provision as such is not as easy as it sounds nor does it avoid the will of the Courts to hold contractual provisions that are unfair to the offending party in equity as being unenforceable.

Therefore, a liquidated damages clause must have a mechanism for determining an amount for payment that has some relevance to the actual losses of the owner and resemble a genuine attempt at estimating those losses that have a reasonable likelihood of occurring in the event of a breach.

If the provision does not meet these criteria then the amount payable and the provision in the contract relating thereto are a penalty and are unenforceable.

Alternatively, if the amount is not excessive and bears some resemblance to the actual losses of the owner then the provision will generally be upheld by the Courts as a genuine estimate of damages likely incurred. As long as the amount in the provision is commensurate with the owner's probable actual loss then the provision may likely be valid.

Putting aside the debate over whether the provisions is a genuine estimate of damages or a penalty, the event potentially triggering the provision must be one caused by the contractor or for which it was responsible. As a result, the onus will be on the owner to prove that the event was caused by the contractor. If the owner meets that burden, the amount payable under the provision becomes a debt owing by the contractor.

Other issues to be aware of in the context of liquidated damages provisions is the potential for conduct on the part of the owner to be held as a waiver of the application of the clause or payment of same by the contractor. For example, although not always the case, the taking of possession of the project by the owner may constitute a waiver of the payment of damages for delay.

Another example is in the context of granting an extension of time to complete. Although granting such an extension may be a waiver of the right to enforce liquidated damages provisions, if the contractor fails to perform and deliver by the extended completion date, the owner's right to enforce the payment of liquidated damages may be re-triggered.

Alternatively, if the owner orders extras or make numerous changes to the contract and deliverables, these may be held to be a waiver of the right to enforce and recover liquidated damages if the contractor's ability to complete is directly affected by these changes.

Even in the instances where the parties avoid the lump sum trap but rather base the assessment of "liquidated damages" upon a formula, where the formula results in an amount that is far in excess of any actual loss or damage, the Courts will not hesitate calling that formula "grossly excessive and punitive" or otherwise disproportionate such that it is a formula for a penalty rather than liquidated damages2.

If a contractor fails to complete work by a specific time as required under a contract due to the actions of the owner (e.g. delay by the owner in ordering essential equipment or having it installed), the contractor is relieved of any duty to pay any liquidated damages stipulated in that contract3. In these instances, any time extension clause may also not retain the applicability of any liquidated damage clause relieving the contractor from any liability for liquidated damages.

One way to potentially avoid the provision being held a penalty clause is to provide that the mechanism is a discount on amounts otherwise payable to the contractor. A deduction in the amount payable as liquidated damages4 where a contract for construction provides for a per day deduction on the contract as an amount for delay is a valid mechanism. However, it is important to note that the ability to rely on such a discount may be vitiated in the event that the contractor issues a certificate of completion and acceptance of same by the owner is viewed as a waiver to claim a discount against amounts owing.

Other ways to frame a liquidated damages provision is the form of a surcharge payable by a contractor relating to the cost to repair poor or defective workmanship5. However, caution should be exercised when coming up with the mechanism in which the surcharge is imposed. For example, a clause permitting a deduction of the value of any incomplete portions of work done by a contractor from the contract price plus a surcharge of 50% of that cost as damages would be considered the imposition of a penalty6.

A letter of credit can also be a valid pre-estimate of damage and thus constitute valid liquidated damages. For example, a letter of credit used as a mechanism to guarantee a result may be considered a "genuine pre-estimate of damages" and not a financial penalty7. As a result, drawing down on the letter of credit would be the means by which an owner could enforce that guarantee.

Interestingly, if an owner's actual losses exceed the amount specified as payable in the provision that may serve to the benefit of the contractor who would only be obligated to pay that amount and no more. Any excess losses befall upon the owner's shoulders. In other words, the owner cannot recover the full amount of actual losses because the contract provides that that the agreed upon sum or formula shall be the limit of the contractor's liability to the owner.

Alternatively, if the amount specified in the contract exceeds the actual losses, the amount in the contract may still be payable by the contractor as long as it is not grossly excessive or wholly disproportionate to the actual losses. This serves to he benefit of the owner.

Ultimately, the basis upon which the Courts tend to rest their conclusions is on whether a true construction of the clause was intended to limit damages, both to secure a payment to the owner and the amounts thereof payable by the contractor. If the parties can generate a mechanism that accomplishes this goal then the provision will likely enforceable and will otherwise be upheld.


1. English House of Lords case: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v. New Garage and Motor Company Limited, [1915] A.C. 79.

2. Supreme Court of Canada case: H.F. Clarke Ltd. v. Thermidaire Corp., [1976] 1 S.C.R. 319.

3. Perini Pacific Ltd. v. Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District (1966), 57 D.L.R. (2d) 307 (B.C.C.A), affirmed by [1967] S.C.R. 189.

4. Janse-Mitchell Construction Co. v. Calgary (City), [1919] 3 W.W.R. 150 (S.C.C.).

5. New Home Warranty Program of Manitoba Inc. v. Nagam (1991), 48 C.L.R. 170 (M.B.Q.B.).

6. MacDonald v. Northwest Biscuit Co., [1924] 1 W.W.R. 795 (A.B.C.A.).

7. Edmonton (City) v. Triple Five Corp. (1994), 22 Alta. L.R. (3d) 289 (Q.B.).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
4 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for a complimentary half-day seminar on the following topics:

  • "When “actively employed” is not enough: Employee bonus update", presented by Matthew Curtis and Chelsea Rasmussen
  • "The top 10 labour arbitration cases of the past year", presented by
18 Nov 2016, Seminar, Vancouver, Canada

Ten days following the election, join us for a discussion with Gary Doer, former Canadian Ambassador to the US, and Gordon Giffin, US Ambassador to Canada under Bill Clinton, to discuss how the new President and Congressional makeup will shape US-Canada relations for years to come.

25 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Dentons hosted a panel discussion about the management of liabilities and risks associated with environmental crises, including potential liabilities for directors and officers and provided insight into risk and liability techniques associated with environmental crisis management.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.