Canada: Individual Acts And Corporate Benefits: Towards A More Expansive Standard For Company Liability

Last Updated: April 19 2018
Article by Michael L. Byers

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision has arguably expanded the scope of a company's liability for the actions of those who control it. While much of the commentary on DBDC Spadina Ltd. v. Walton ("Walton")1 has focused on its analysis of the tort of knowing assistance of breach of fiduciary duty,2 Walton's discussion and application of the 'corporate identification doctrine' – which courts use to attribute a company with the knowledge of its principal – is worth pausing on. Walton makes it easier for litigants to use the corporate identification doctrine as a 'sword' to impose liability to other companies controlled by the same person or persons who have committed wrongful acts.


Walton arose from a multi-million dollar real estate fraud. The Waltons convinced investors (including the appellants and respondents) to invest in companies they incorporated to invest in commercial real estate projects. Each project was to be funded 50% by the Waltons and 50% by investors. The Waltons never actually invested their own money, and moved investors' money through a number of different companies that they controlled. The investors eventually obtained judgments against the Waltons that the Waltons could not satisfy.

A priority dispute between victims of the fraud over the remaining assets held by companies used in the fraudulent scheme ensued, culminating in the Ontario Court of Appeal's Walton decision. The appellants had invested in the 'Schedule B Companies', and sought to execute against the 'Schedule C Properties' held by the 'Schedule C Companies', in which the respondents invested. Justice Newbould's dismissal of the appellants' claims was overturned by the Court of Appeal, albeit with a spirited dissent by Justice Van Rensberg.3

Walton's Relaxation of the Corporate Identification Doctrine

The test for when a corporation will be liable for the acts of its directing mind was set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian Dredge & Dock Co. v. R. ("Canadian Dredge"). In Canadian Dredge, Justice Estey held that a company would be affixed with such liability where the act of a directing mind: (a) was within the field of operation assigned to the individual; (b) was not totally in fraud of the company; and (c) the individual's actions were, by design or result, partly for the benefit of the company.4 Although Canadian Dredge concerned the criminal liability of a corporation, the three-part test set out by Justice Estey was subsequently applied in civil cases.5 In the Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of)6 ("Livent"), which was released in late 2017, the majority questioned the strict application of the Canadian Dredge test in civil cases, and held that courts retained discretion not to strictly apply it where it would not be in the public interest to do so.7

On the authority of Livent, Justice Blair for the majority in Walton held that the Canadian Dredge test (particularly the second and third criteria) should be applied in a "less demanding fashion" in civil cases, particularly those such as Walton that arose from a complex fraud involving a number of victims and corporate actors operated by a fraudster. He rejected the argument that it was necessary to show that each individual company specifically benefitted from the scheme.8 Justice Blair concluded that the Schedule C Companies should be affixed with liability for the actions of their directing minds, and granted judgment in favour of the appellants in the amount of $22,680,852, less certain deductions. In reaching this conclusion, Justice Blair found that a transfer of monies from a 'clearing house' corporate entity used by the Waltons to the Schedule C Companies benefited those companies generally, even if it could not be conclusively demonstrated that it benefitted each specific entity and it did not benefit their shareholders (the respondents, who were also victims of the fraud).9 This grounded the conclusion that the Schedule C Companies had knowledge of the fiduciary duty that Ms. Walton owed to the plaintiffs, and participated in her breach of those duties.10

In her dissenting reasons, Justice Van Rensberg disagreed that "relaxing" the approach to the corporate identification doctrine was warranted on either policy grounds or on the authority of Livent. She was of the view that a specific benefit needed to flow to each Schedule C Company to impose liability on it, and that in any event Livent provided her with the discretion to refrain from applying the corporate identification doctrine, which she would have exercised to dismiss the appellants' claims.11

The majority's application of a less rigid standard allowed Justice Blair to disregard some of the strictures of separate corporate personality and reach what the majority saw as a more fair outcome for the appellants. By concluding that it was not necessary for the appellants to show that each of the Schedule C Companies separately benefitted from the fraud, the majority's approach relieved the appellants of a significant legal and evidentiary burden, allowing them to obtain judgment against the Schedule C Companies without having to trace the flow of funds to them, which is often extremely challenging or impossible in cases involving complex frauds.


Prior to Walton and Livent, the application of the corporate identification doctrine was criticized by some for being muddled and inconsistent.12 While these two decisions have provided some clarity, the combination of a less stringent standard and greater latitude for judicial discretion creates uncertainty as to when the doctrine may apply. Given the importance of the case to commercial litigation generally, and Justice Van Rensberg's strong dissent, the litigious saga of the Waltons' fraud may well end up before the Supreme Court of Canada. If not, it will be interesting to see whether lower courts are willing to follow Justice Blair's reasoning and expand the pool of liable corporate defendants in particular cases.

While Walton is most clearly useful to victims of complex frauds, its potential utility is not limited to such cases. Plaintiffs, particularly sympathetic ones, now have another tool that may be used to pursue other entities within a corporate structure other than the one with which they dealt with directly.


[1] 2018 ONCA 60.

[2] In short, the court held that knowing assistance of breach of fiduciary does not require the plaintiff to trace specific funds to a particular corporate defendant in order to be able to obtain damages against that defendant.

[3] Justice Blair held that Justice Newbould had erred by finding that Ms. Walton was not a directing mind of the Schedule C Companies in light of an earlier finding by Justice Brown (then sitting on the Commercial List of the Superior Court of Justice) that she was.

[4] [1985] 1 S.C.R. 662, 19 C.C.C. (3d) 1 at p 38.

[5] See e.g. Standard Investments Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1985), 22 D.L.R. (4th) 410 (Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal refd (1986), 53 O.R. (3f) 663. Since 2004, amendments to the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c C-46, have made it easier to impose liability on corporations in the criminal context. A corporation may now be liable for the acts of a broadly-defined "senior officer"; it need not be a directing mind: see ss. 2, 22.1.

[6] 2017 SCC 63.

[7] Livent, supra at para 104. The majority in Livent concluded that the defendant auditor could not affix the plaintiff (the receiver of Livent) with knowledge of the fraud committed by Livent's principals in order to avoid liability for a negligent audit.

[8] Walton, supra, at paras 69-73.

[9] Walton, supra, at paras 78-83.

[10] Walton, supra, at paras 78-96.

[11] Walton, supra, at paras 234-237.

[12] See e.g. Darcy L. MacPherson, "The Civil and Criminal Applications of the Identification Doctrine: Arguments for Harmonization", Alberta Law Review, (2007) 45: 1 171.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Michael L. Byers
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions