ARTICLE
18 December 2017

Sunrise Propane Appeals Against Conviction And Fines Dismissed

FR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP

Contributor

For more than 40 years, we have invested in the success of each of our clients, leading them toward the achievement of their business and legal goals. The team focused nature of our firm means that clients benefit from our collective experience and the tailored approach we bring to each matter. At Fogler, Rubinoff LLP we pride ourselves on our exceptional client service, resourcefulness, and our entrepreneurial spirit. With expertise in over twenty areas of practice and across numerous industries, we see ourselves as a centralized resource for our clients. Our clients include financial institutions, publicly traded corporations, securities dealers, emerging companies, construction companies, real estate developers and lenders, franchisors, First Nations, and family-owned enterprises and individuals. To learn more about how we can assist with your business and legal needs visit: foglers.com.
On November 27, 2017 the Ontario Superior Court dismissed all appeals against conviction and sentence relating to Sunrise Propane Energy Group under both Ontario provincial environmental...
Canada Environment

 On November 27, 2017 the Ontario Superior Court dismissed all appeals against conviction and sentence relating to Sunrise Propane Energy Group under both Ontario provincial environmental and occupational health and safety law (see 2017 ONSC 6954). On January 25, 2016 Ontario Court Judge Chapin had fined Sunrise Propane Energy Group - the operator, a numbered company - the holder of the lease, the insurance policy and the licence under the Technical Safety and Standards Authority, and two directors of the company, a total of $5.3 million for a propane gas explosion. The explosion killed an employee and caused the overnight evacuation of some 12,000 neighbouring residents. Homes in the northwestern part of Toronto were uninhabitable for over a year, a car dealership business was ruined, there had been structural damage to buildings, disruption of local work and business and the temporary closure of a child-care centre. The trial judge's reasons for judgment on the original finding of guilt, all affirmed on appeal, can be found at 2013 ONCJ 358. My summary of those reasons can be found in Fogler Rubinoff's Website under Events and Resources at http://www.foglers.com/uploads/press/file/103/Environment_Energy_Law_July_19.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More