Canada: Limitation Periods: Have You Waited Too Long?

Last Updated: December 15 2017
Article by Varoujan Arman


Those unfamiliar with civil litigation may not be aware of the requirement to commence litigation within two years of discovering a claim. In Ontario, this requirement is imposed through provincial legislation called the Limitations Act, 2002. To give a simple example, if a loan becomes due on January 1, 2017 and the borrower defaults, then the lender has until January 1, 2019 to commence a lawsuit. While the lender could still issue a claim with the court after January 1, 2019, the defendant would likely have a full defence available on the basis that the limitation period expired. The likely result would be a prompt and successful motion dismissing the claim together with a costs award against the plaintiff.

In the above example, when the two years started to run, or when the claim was "discovered" in other words, was easy to determine. The claim was discovered on the date the loan became due, and therefore the two years started to run from that date. Things become more complicated when the date of "discovery" of the claim is less clear. For example, consider a property owner who discovers a leak in her recently constructed roof on January 1, 2017. She hires an engineer to investigate the problem, and on March 1, 2017, the engineer advises her that the leak is a result of structural beams in the roof sagging, compromising the integrity of the roof. Does the property owner have until January 1, 2019 to sue the roofing contractor, or until March 1, 2019?  Which of these two dates will be the "discovery" date that triggers the running of the two-year limitation period? 

The question of whether an expert opinion is required to trigger discoverability, and hence the limitation period, has been considered by the courts before. The answer has typically been "no" - a plaintiff or claimant has an obligation during the initial two-year period to investigate their claim to determine how strong the case is and who the appropriate defendants may be. This includes getting the assistance of an expert, if required (i.e. an engineer to study a building, or a doctor to assess the cause of an injury or infection). 

Determining when the limitation period started to run gets even more interesting when the would-be defendant starts assisting the claimant to correct or minimize the problem complained of. In that circumstance, the courts have provided a bit more leeway. That is, a limitation period can sometimes be tolled (put on "pause") while those efforts are underway. The rationale for this is that a relationship should not be jeopardized while corrective action is being taken by requiring the commencement of a lawsuit. However, there are limits to how long the limitation period will be paused while a potential defendant is taking corrective measures.

Steinberg v. Toews Engineering Inc.

In a recent decision in the case of Steinberg v. Toews Engineering Inc., the Court was tasked with considering both of the scenarios described above. The plaintiff was building five custom homes for his family with geothermal heating and cooling systems. The defendant, Toews Engineering, was retained to prepare the required engineering work for the geothermal systems. Upon moving into the homes, the plaintiff and his family members were dissatisfied with the performance of the heating and cooling systems. The plaintiff moved into the first home in September 2007, and the other homes were all occupied by the end of 2009. The plaintiff alleged that the problems were identified immediately. The lawsuit against Toews Engineering was not commenced until June 19, 2013.

Toews Engineering brought a motion for summary judgment to have the action dismissed on the basis that it was commenced beyond the applicable two-year limitation period. The plaintiff defended the motion on two grounds. First, that he did not discover the loss or sufficient facts regarding its cause until he obtained an expert report from another engineering firm on July 29, 2011 (just a month short of two years before the lawsuit was commenced on June 19, 2013).  Part of the plaintiff's argument was also that Toews Engineering continued to reassure him that the problems were not caused by any deficiency in its design work. Second, the plaintiff argued that the limitation period did not run during a prolonged period when Toews Engineering was still working with the plaintiff to try to remedy the alleged deficiencies.

The Court considered the following applicable legal principles derived from past cases:

  • the plaintiff is required to act with due diligence in acquiring facts in order to be fully apprised of the material facts upon which a claim can be based
  • a limitation period commences when the plaintiff discovers the underlying material facts, or alternatively, when the plaintiff ought to have discovered those facts with the exercise of reasonable diligence
  • the discovery of a claim does not depend upon the plaintiff knowing that his or her claim is likely to succeed
  • that having regard to the nature of the injury, loss or damage, a proceeding would be an appropriate means to seek a remedy – "appropriate" means "legally appropriate"

The Court rejected the plaintiff's argument that he did not discover his claim until he received an expert report in July 2011, as there was clear evidence that he blamed Toews Engineering for the alleged deficiencies in 2010. In an email from July of that year, the plaintiff wrote Toews Engineering stating that he believed the systems had design faults. As a result, Justice Gordon found that even if Toews Engineering had consistently taken the position that the alleged deficiencies were not its fault, by the end of August 2010, the plaintiff did not believe what he was being told.

The timing of the events did not favour the plaintiff's second argument that the limitation period did not run while Toews Engineering was trying to address the issues. The Court rejected this argument because the evidence established that by October 2010, any efforts by Toews Engineering to address the plaintiff's complaints had come to an end. A significant piece of evidence in this regard was that the plaintiff refused to sign a full and final release in August 2010, which Toews Engineering had sent him as part of a proposal to perform certain remedial work. More than two years passed from October 2010 (when it was clear that the parties had completely ceased working together) before the action was commenced in June of 2013.

A similar issue was recently considered by the Court of Appeal in Presidential MSH Corporation v. Marr Foster & Co. LLP, 2017 ONCA 325.  In that case, the plaintiff sued the defendant accounting firm for filing its tax returns late, thereby missing out on available tax credits and incurring a loss of approximately half-a-million dollars. The plaintiff did not sue within two years of the CRA's initial denial of the tax credits, but did sue within two years of the CRA's subsequent refusal to alter its assessments in response to the plaintiff's notice of objection made under the Income Tax Act. The Court of Appeal overturned the motion judge's decision dismissing the action as having been brought too late. In doing so, the court stated that an action against a professional may not be appropriate if it can be resolved by the professional without the need for court proceedings.  Accordingly, beginning legal action may be premature if there is an alternative process in place that has not yet been exhausted; in this case, the statutory process for objecting to notices of assessment under the Income Tax Act. However, the Court of Appeal did caution that the date when the alternative process became exhausted must be reasonably certain or ascertainable by the court. 

In dismissing the action in Steinberg v. Toews Engineering Inc., the Court was not without sympathy for the plaintiff. The Court wrote: "From the evidence before me, Mr. Steinberg is an honourable and well-intentioned gentleman.  It may well be that he has suffered a wrong. That he should be deprived of his right to have this wrong addressed is a regrettable but necessary consequence of failing to pursue that right in a diligent manner." 

The decision therefore serves as a reminder of the court's willingness to place reasonable limits on the ability to prosecute a claim after the initial two-year presumptive limitation period has passed. Limitation periods are partly intended to give parties commercial certainty and to encourage parties with legitimate claims to prosecute them in a timely fashion. Potential claimants would be prudent to investigate a problem promptly, including hiring an expert to analyze the issue at an early stage where necessary. Failing to do so could result in the total loss of a right to pursue a claim. Claimants must also be careful not to rely on any assistance being received from potential defendants as a basis to delay the commencement of a lawsuit, as they may find themselves out of time.

Originally published in Commercial Litigation Update: December 2017

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Varoujan Arman
Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada

This year’s program is entitled “An Analysis of Fidelity Claims for the Modern World.” The program will address important substantive and practical issues germane to today’s fidelity claims handling.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions