Canada: IP Monitor - Measure Twice And Cut Once: Federal Court Dismisses Trademark Case For Insufficient Evidence

Trademark owners are increasingly using an abbreviated process – the application – to enforce their rights. Applications avoid the costs and delay of discovery and the complexities of trial. This litigation strategy can be effective if a trademark owner carefully marshals its evidence at the outset. Evidentiary gaps can be fatal, as demonstrated in Justice Locke's recent decision in EAB Tool Company Inc. v Norske Tools Ltd., 2017 FC 898.


EAB owns a series of registered trademarks (both a word mark and several designs) for the trademark EXCHANGE-A-BLADE. EAB sells saw blades that customers can return when dull and trade in on new sharpened blades. In October 2016, Norske entered the Canadian market providing the same service under the trademark TRADE-A-BLADE. EAB commenced the application complaining of trademark infringement, passing off and unfair competition. Justice Locke found that none of these claims were made out.

The history between the parties and their predecessors is lengthy and complicated. In brief, EAB started business in 1976 and became the Canadian distributor for Sibkis Trade-A-Blade Inc. using Sibkis' TRADE-A-BLADE trademark. The relationship between EAB and Sibkis terminated in 1978. EAB continued using the TRADE-A-BLADE trademark until 1982 when, at Sibkis' instance, it stopped using TRADE-A-BLADE and began using the EXCHANGE-A-BLADE trademark instead. Tellingly, there was evidence elicited on cross-examination that EAB switched to the EXCHANGE-A-BLADE trademark to distinguish itself from TRADE-A-BLADE.

Although Sibkis had obtained a Canadian trademark registration for TRADE-A-BLADE, the mark was not used in Canada and the registration was expunged in 1996 for failure to renew. Norske purchased Sibkis' assets in December 2015 and began selling products under the TRADE-A-BLADE mark in Canada. Norske also promotes itself as "THE ORIGINAL EXCHANGE SYSTEM." Norske applied for two Canadian trademarks for TRADE-A-BLADE; these applications were approved by the Trademarks Office, advertised and are being opposed by EAB.

Confusion between the marks?

In analyzing EAB's trademark infringement claim, Justice Locke quickly focused on whether the marks were confusing. Applying the statutory test in subsection 6(5) of the Trade-marks Act from the perspective of a casual consumer in a hurry who sees the impugned mark when he or she has not more than an imperfect recollection of the registered mark and does not give the matter any scrutiny nor examine the similarities and differences between the marks, the court found there was no confusion. 

  • Neither mark was considered to be inherently distinctive. Accordingly, they were only entitled to a narrow ambit of protection such that even small differences would be sufficient to diminish the likelihood of confusion. Additionally, the court noted that in the case of weak marks, some confusion may be inevitable without sanction.
  • Considering that the EXCHANGE-A-BLADE mark had been in use since 1982, that the goods, services and business of EAB and Norske were essentially the same, and that there was nothing about the nature of the trade to differentiate the marks, all three of these factors favoured EAB.
  • The court then turned to the most important factor in assessing confusion: the degree of resemblance between the trademarks or trade names in appearance or sound or in ideas suggested by them. The court recognized that both marks share the common "-A-BLADE" element, and EXCHANGE and TRADE are synonyms. However, it applied the well-established proposition that the first part of mark is often the most important in assessing distinctiveness and found the marks looked and sounded different. Recognizing that TRADE-A-BLADE and EXCHANGE-A-BLADE are similar in the idea suggested by them, the court found the difference was significant given the low ambit of protection that inherently non-distinctive marks are entitled to, especially since the difference is at the beginning of the mark.
  • Interestingly, the court was also influenced by the fact the applications for the TRADE-A-BLADE word and design mark were both approved by the Trademarks Office and EXCHANGE-A-BLADE was originally registered over TRADE-A-BLADE (which was on the register when the EXCHANGE-A-BLADE mark was applied for).
  • In considering the surrounding circumstances, the court found that a lack of evidence of actual confusion was not determinative because the marks had only been in concurrent use for one month when the application was filed and three months when the applicant's evidence was prepared. Such a short period was not considered telling.
  • EAB argued Norske had "carefully orchestrated [a] plan to emulate [EAB's] product line, packaging, credit system and hire its employees to gain access to [EAB's] customers." This was of no consequence. The court found that EAB's evidence on this point was weak, as was the jurisprudential basis for the complaint, noting "There is nothing inherently improper in emulating a successful business model or in hiring away a competitor's employees."

Given a lack of confusion, the court dismissed EAB's infringement claim.

Passing off and unfair competition

The court also rejected EAB's complaint under paragraph 7(a) of the Trade-marks Act. Paragraph 7(a) provides that no person shall make a false or misleading statement tending to discredit the business or goods or services of a competitor. The elements of that cause of action are: (a) a false and misleading statement; (b) tending to discredit the business, goods or services of a competitor; and (c) resulting damage.

The court noted it is not necessary to establish that the false or misleading statement was made with malice or knowledge of its falsity but that a trademark owner must show that the tendency of the statement is to discredit and that it has suffered damage as a result.

EAB's complaint focused on Norske's use of the phrase "THE ORIGINAL EXCHANGE SYSTEM." EAB argued this was false and misleading because it suggested EAB was not the first to offer a blade exchange system in Canada. Norske defended its use of the phrase on the basis that it traced its rights to Sibkis and that Sibkis was (albeit through EAB as distributor) in fact the "original" saw blade trade-in business in Canada.

This tenuous argument was rejected. The court found that the representation was false and misleading; Sibkis had abandoned its TRADE-A-BLADE trademark; and it was disingenuous for Norske to claim to be the "original." However, EAB's case failed for lack of evidence that it had suffered damage as a consequence of Norske's claim. Justice Locke held that evidence as to damage has to be directly attributable to the false or misleading statement and not result from competition generally.

While EAB's passing off claim was also dismissed because there was no confusion, the court did highlight the differences between a trademark infringement action – which compares the registered trademark and the impugned trademark – and a passing off action – where the marks as used are compared. Comparing the marks as used, the court was struck by the stark differences between the parties' respective colour schemes and their different packaging.

Subparagraph 7(d)(i) of the Trade-marks Act prohibits anyone from describing the character, quality, quantity or composition of their goods or services in manner that is materially false and likely to mislead the public. While the court found that Norske's claim to be THE ORIGINAL EXCHANGE SYSTEM was materially false, it dismissed EAB's claim because the evidence failed to establish a causal link between Norske's use of this phrase and the EAB's lost sales.

The take-aways

This decision is important for several reasons. First, it highlights the speed with which trademark disputes can be determined on application – the parties had a decision within 11 months. Trademark infringement actions will typically take more than two years. Second, it is a timely review of the distinctions between the various causes of action that trademark owners have to protect their brands. Finally, it is a cautionary tale – trademark owners who elect to proceed by way of application need to be ready to put a compelling case forward. Where claims are based on the unfair competition provisions of section 7 of the Trade-marks Act, some evidence of actual damage will be required.

About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world's preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see

Law around the world

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions