Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Sets Limit On Duty To Consult & Religious Freedom In Ktunaxa V B.C.

Last Updated: November 15 2017
Article by Paul A. Beke and Ashton Butler

In Ktunaxa Nation v British Columbia (Ktunaxa), 2017 SCC 54, the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) recently considered two constitutional rights in the context of land resource development:

1. freedom of religion, under s. 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter)

2. protection of Aboriginal interests, under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (the Constitution).

Specifically, the SCC decided to uphold approval of the Jumbo Glacier ski resort by the B.C. Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (the Minister), despite claims by the Ktunaxa First Nation that the development would breach the Nation's constitutional rights.

Limits of Constitutional Rights Protecting Unproven Aboriginal Claims

Some key points from Ktunaxa are as follows:

1. The duty to consult in s.35 of the Constitution requires that the Crown act honourably. Section 35 grants a right to a proper process, not a right to a particular outcome. The reconciliation of Aboriginal and state interests is a process of "give and take," and outcomes are not guaranteed. Ultimately, when the Crown has consulted adequately, a development may proceed without the consent of an Aboriginal group.

2. Courts look favourably upon extensive consultation and assessment processes that take place throughout a rigourous regulatory process.

3. Section 2(a) of the Charter does not extend to protect the object of religious beliefs (such as Grizzly Bear Spirit). Rather, the right protects freedom to hold and practice religious beliefs.

Long History of Consultation Culminated in a Stark Choice for Minister

The facts in Ktunaxa were that Glacier Resorts Ltd. (Glacier) proposed to build a year-round ski resort in the area the Ktunaxa people call Qat'muk. For over two decades, Glacier pursued an evaluation process with the B.C. government and stakeholders, including the Ktunaxa and Shuswap peoples. Those First Nations each received funding to participate extensively. Early in the process leading to the original approval, the Ktunaxa stated (among other concerns) that Qat'muk was a place of spiritual significance—home to an important population of grizzly bears and to Grizzly Bear Spirit, a principal spirit within Ktunaxa religious beliefs.

After 20 years of review and consultation, the parties seemed to agree in principle on appropriate accommodations. But then, the Ktunaxa adopted a new uncompromising position—that accommodation was impossible because the ski resort would drive Grizzly Bear Spirit from Qat'muk and irrevocably impair their religious practices.

Ultimately, the Minister decided that the negotiated accommodations, approval by the Shuswap and the continued ability of the Ktunaxa to exercise their aboriginal rights made the development plan reasonable. This was particularly so when balanced against the social benefits of the project ($900 million in capital investment, and 750 to 800 direct, permanent jobs). Glacier had committed to accommodating the Ktunaxa, in a variety of ways, including: (1) reducing the development area by 60%, (2) monitoring environmental impacts, (3) reserving the area for continuing traditional practices, and (4) reducing the impact on the grizzly bear population, by removing a ski lift on the west side of the valley, excluding the lower Jumbo Creek area from development, and establishing a wildlife management area. The province also committed to manage the grizzly bear population through existing legislation and policies. After this deep consultation process, the Minister concluded that the extensive accommodations provided to the Ktunaxa minimized impacts on Aboriginal rights, the environment and the grizzly bear habitat.

SCC Explains that Freedom of Religion Does Not Protect Deities

The Ktunaxa applied for judicial review, but the chambers judge, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia, and the SCC all upheld the Minister's approval of the Master Development Agreement between Glacier and B.C. The Ktunaxa had raised two constitutional challenges:

1. a novel claim that the Crown had breached the Ktunaxa's Charter right to freedom of religion, by allowing development, which would cause Grizzly Bear Spirit to flee the Qat'muk area

2. a claim that the Crown had failed to meet its duty to consult the Ktunaxa, under s. 35 of the Constitution.

On the first constitutional challenge, the SCC held that the Ktunaxa had shown sincere belief in the existence and importance of Grizzly Bear Spirit, and belief that permanent development would drive the Spirit away. Nevertheless, the Ktunaxa had failed to show that the development would hinder their religious beliefs or practices. The SCC concluded that the scope of s. 2(a) of the Charter protects neither the presence of Grizzly Bear Spirit, itself, nor the spiritual meaning that the Ktunaxa derive from that presence. The SCC reasoned that the scope of the 2(a) right could not extend further, because that would entangle the courts in the evaluation of the merits and methods of protecting objects of religious belief, such as spirits. Scrutiny and analysis of such profoundly personal beliefs in courtrooms would be inconsistent with the principles underlying freedom of religion.

SCC Confirmed the Right to Consultation is Not a Veto

On the second constitutional challenge, the SCC held that the Minister had reasonably decided that the Crown had met its duty to consult the Ktunaxa; in this case, the Crown had consulted deeply. Under s. 35 of the Constitution, when the Crown has adequately consulted in response to an unproven Aboriginal rights claim, a development may proceed without consent. Here, the Ktunaxa participated in extensive consultation and they received significant accommodations. The Ktunaxa were not seeking further modifications to the development, but rather a ban on permanent development. The Minister encountered a binary choice: approve or ban development. The SCC acknowledged that the Minister's approval might seem tragic to the Ktunaxa, but until Aboriginal rights are proven at trial, "consultation and accommodation, imperfect as they may be, are the best available legal tools in the reconciliation basket."

Concluding Thoughts

In the case of unproven Aboriginal claims, Ktunaxa provides guidance on the limits courts will place on (1) Charter-protected rights, and (2) the constitutional right to consultation by the Crown. Ktunaxa reinforces the SCC's decision in Haida Nation that the duty to consult does not provide unsatisfied claimants a veto over development. In fact, when the Minister has undertaken deep consultation and accommodation efforts, the government may be entitled to approve a development project without consent. In this case, there is no clear winner, with both the developer and the Ktunaxa undoubtedly left feeling frustrated with the process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Miller Thomson LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Miller Thomson LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions