Canada: An Online Date To Forget

Last Updated: November 9 2017
Article by Stephen Thiele

The modern era has given those seeking love and romance more tools to find the right partner. Online dating sites are thriving with people hoping to find their perfect "match".

However, the world of online dating is not free from the chances of vulnerable romance-seekers suffering new heartbreaks as a result of fraud. A simple introductory "Hello" typed in an email's subject-line and sent to a complete stranger over the internet can lead to devastating emotional and financial consequences.

Indeed, the recent case of Larizza v. The Royal Bank of Canada, 2017 ONSC 6140, serves as a warning for anyone who uses online dating to fulfill their romantic needs.

The Facts

In this case, Antoinette Larizza, a 54-year-old divorced mother of two adult children entered the world of online dating.

On February 23, 2012 she met Albert Rosenberg online and a few days later met with him in-person.

When the pair physically met, Albert told Antoinette that he was the 56-year-old heir to the Ovaltine empire and that he was a wealthy Swiss-Canadian businessman.

By July of 2012, Albert urged Antoinette to sell her house, quit her $110,000 a year job and move in with him at his Yorkville Avenue penthouse. The penthouse had been leased under an agreement with Antoinette as the tenant and Albert as occupant after Albert's credit check information made the landlord uncomfortable that Albert should be the "tenant" under the lease. The credit check came back showing "insufficient" credit information for Albert.

While Antoinette signed the tenancy agreement, she thought Albert was the tenant.

In September 2012, Antoinette was referred to Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP ("Faskens") for legal advice in connection with a pending marriage to Albert, estate planning and a trust fund.

The referral was made from another law firm who Antoinette understood acted for Albert.

Meanwhile, Antoinette had given large sums of money to Albert, including $5,000 from her savings account and $150,000 from the sale of her home.

In October 2012, she gave Albert $75,000 more.

Albert either told Antoinette that he needed to borrow the money because his own money was tied up abroad or that he would invest the money for her.

In the summer of 2013, Antoinette grew concerned about financial issues. She confronted Albert, who then assaulted her. Albert was arrested whereupon it was discovered that he was a serial fraudster.

Eventually the rent for the penthouse fell into arrears and the landlord commenced an Application before the Landlord and Tenant Board. In turn, Antoinette commenced a civil action against various parties, including the landlord and Faskens.

Antoinette's claim

The action against Faskens alleged liability for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.

Before getting married to Albert, Antoinette had been referred by his lawyers to Faskens to ensure that she received independent representation for a pre-nuptial agreement that Albert was purportedly preparing through Swiss lawyers, for estate planning and for a trust fund.

At the initial meeting with a Faskens lawyer, Antoinette advised of her planned marriage to Albert and that he had planned to buy a $10 million insurance policy, naming Antoinette as the beneficiary for a trust that would benefit both Antoinette and her two daughters.

The Faskens lawyer then wrote to the referring lawyer to explain that Faskens had been retained by Antoinette to provide estate planning advice, to provide advice in relation to the proposed trust and to prepare separate power of attorneys for property and personal care naming Albert as Antoinette's attorney and one of her daughters as the alternate attorney.

Despite making efforts to get instructions and complete the work that they had been retained to do, none of the tasks were completed because Faskens never received a response from their inquiries, particularly about the proposed wedding date.

Legal bills sent to Antoinette were also not paid.

However, when Faskens learned that Antoinette had been a victim of fraud, the accounts were written off.

The claim against the landlord, among other things, sought damages for the new tort of intrusion upon seclusion.

During the application process for renting the penthouse, the landlord had conducted a credit check of Antoinette without any prior authorization.

In support of this claim, Antoinette relied on the landlord's own policy which precluded credit checks without consent, the Credit Reporting Act (the "CRA") and Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act ("PIPEDA").

Claims against landlord dismissed

While the court found that the CRA had not been breached by the landlord, it concluded that PIPEDA had been contravened.

But the statutory breach did not lead to a finding of liability because the information obtained by the landlord was authorized by the CRA.

Also, the information contained in the report was found not to constitute an invasion into Antoinette's personal affairs.

In any event, the court further ruled that the third element of the intrusion upon seclusion tort was not satisfied since the circumstances under which the credit check was conducted would not be considered by the reasonable person as highly offensive, causing humiliation or anguish.

Justice Favreau explained that the credit report had been obtained to determine whether to rent the penthouse to Antoinette and Albert, not for an improper or nefarious purpose.

All other claims against the landlord were dismissed as well, as were the claims against Antoinette's lawyers.

Claims against lawyers dismissed

With respect to the claims against Faskens, Antoinette's primary complaint was that they failed to discover that Albert was a serial fraudster.

Antoinette contended that Faskens should have conducted searches with respect to Albert that would have led to such a revelation.

Also, Antoinette contended that Faskens failed to refer her to a family lawyer as promised and that if this promise had been kept the family law lawyer would have been able to take the necessary steps to protect her interests.

On the contrary, Faskens denied that they had any obligation to conduct any searches to ascertain Albert's identity and that matters never reached a point where it was necessary for Antoinette to be referred to a family law lawyer in connection with a review of the purported pre-nuptial agreement that never materialized.

Also, Faskens denied that their role was to investigate Antoinette's motivations on Albert's behalf, which she alleged involved ensuring that she was not a "gold digger". Antoinette argued that by reviewing her motivations to marry Albert, Faskens was purportedly acting for him

No negligence

With respect to the negligence claim against Faskens, the court determined that their conduct did not fall below their required standard of care to Antoinette or that they caused Antoinette's damages.

Justice Favreau explained that it defied common sense that Faskens was required to conduct an investigation into Albert's background and identity as a matter of course. Indeed, it was found that Faskens would have been prevented from undertaking any credit, criminal or other background check of Albert without his consent because to do so would be contrary to the CRA and PIPEDA.

In any event, it was evident that Faskens' failure to do so was not the cause of Antoinette's damages because by the time Faskens had been retained, Antoinette had quit her job, sold her house, moved in with Albert and given him over $150,000.

No negligent misrepresentation

The claim for negligent misrepresentation against Faskens was dismissed as well because Antoinette failed to submit any evidence of untrue, inaccurate or misleading statements by their lawyers to her.

There was, in particular, no evidence that Faskens lawyers said anything to Antoinette about Albert's reputation or ever represented that they would act for Antoinette on the family law aspects of her matter.

As such, Antoinette was unable to meet

the second element of the tort of negligent misrepresentation.

No breach of contract

The claim against Faskens for breach of contract was dismissed because Antoinette never asserted that it was an explicit term of the contract that they would conduct a background check on Albert and there was no evidence to support such an assertion.

The court also ruled that such a term could not be implied into Faskens' retainer.

No breach of fiduciary duty

Lastly with respect to breach of fiduciary duty, the court noted that the fiduciary duty imposed on a lawyer includes the obligation to provide full disclosure to clients, to act with undivided loyalty and to maintain the client's affairs in confidence.

Justice Favreau also noted that a distinction exists between the improper provision of legal advice and services, which may give rise to a claim in negligence, and circumstances where a lawyer has breached a fiduciary duty such as where a conflict of interest arises.

Here, the only aspect of Antoinette's claim that might have engaged fiduciary duty issues was her allegation that Faskens had been retained to determine if she was a "gold digger".

But Antoinette's comments about this issue were simply speculative.

No evidence existed to support the allegation that the referral to Faskens was meant to be for the benefit of Albert.

In any event, no damages would flow to Antoinette from her claim that Faskens was "vetting" her because even if their loyalty was divided, Justice Favreau concluded that Faskens had no obligation to do a background check on Albert.

Gardiner Roberts representation

In this case, Gavin J. Tighe, partner and certified specialist in civil litigation, and Scott Gfeller, senior litigation associate, successfully represented Faskens on their summary judgment motion.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stephen Thiele
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions