Canada: BC Court Of Appeal Restores Human Rights Tribunal Decision To Dismiss Complaint

In Francescutti v. Vancouver (City), 2017 BCCA 242, the British Columbia Court of Appeal restored a human rights tribunal decision to dismiss a complaint brought by a former City of Vancouver employee.  The decision provides useful support for the ability of a respondent to succeed on an application to dismiss a complaint, despite the presence of some conflicting facts raising issues of credibility.

Mr. Francescutti was a long-service employee of the City. In 2012, Mr. Francescutti had a perfect attendance record and was awarded a jacket as a token of recognition.  A few weeks later, the jacket arrived and was stored in the office of the Collections Superintendent.  Mr. Francescutti saw the jacket.  It had a label with his name on it and he took it.  The City believed the jacket had been stolen and commenced an investigation.  Mr. Francescutti did not tell anyone he had taken the jacket, and even asked his supervisor on two occasions what was happening.

The City discovered video surveillance evidence that showed Mr. Francescutti holding the jacket. It held an investigation meeting and confronted him with the evidence.  He finally admitted to having taken the jacket.  The City suspended him from employment pending the conclusion of its investigation.

At a second investigation meeting, Mr. Francescutti produced a medical note attributing his behaviour to mental illness and depression and anxiety in particular. The City discharged him from employment for just cause based on his dishonesty and the breach of trust in the employment relationship.

Mr. Francescutti filed a complaint with the BC Human Rights Tribunal alleging discrimination in employment based on mental disability. The City was successful in an application to dismiss the complaint under section 27(1)(c) of the Human Rights Code, based on the Tribunal's finding that the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success.  The Tribunal member made it clear that she was not making findings of fact in her written decision and simply summarizing the evidence provided by the parties.  The City had obtained its own medical opinion from an occupational health physician who concluded that there was no evidence of a causal link between Mr. Francescutti's medical documentation and his ability to know the difference between right and wrong and the consequences of his actions.

The Tribunal held that there was no nexus between the termination of Mr. Francescutti's employment and his mental health issues. The City provided a reasonable non-discriminatory explanation for the termination.  Mr. Francescutti had lied and breached the trust in the employer-employee relationship.  He had admitted to taking the jacket and lying, and stated that he did not know why he did not tell the City he took it.  He did not raise his mental illness until after the City confronted him with the evidence about his theft and gave him notice he may be discharged.  The Tribunal dismissed his complaint pursuant to section 27(1)(c) of the Code.

BC Supreme Court

Mr. Francescutti applied to the BC Supreme Court for judicial review.

The reviewing judge set aside the Tribunal's decision and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for reconsideration, finding its decision to be patently unreasonable: 2016 BCSC 1191.

The judge concluded that the Tribunal was wrong in holding there was no nexus between the termination of Mr. Francescutti's employment and his disability. The judge held the Tribunal erred when it relied on the City's evidence as opposed to Mr. Francescutti's and made findings of fact which were crucial to its decision in areas where credibility was at issue.  The judge stated that the Tribunal made an error by not considering whether Mr. Francescutti's evidence, considered in the absence of the City's contradictory evidence, met the threshold question of whether the complaint had a reasonable prospect of success.

BC Court of Appeal

The City appealed the judicial review decision to the BC Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal held that the reviewing judge erred in concluding that the Tribunal based its decision on findings of fact, in finding that key issues of credibility required a hearing, and in failing to provide sufficient deference to the tribunal.

The Court noted that it is not for the reviewing court to "re-evaluate the evidence before the Tribunal", and stated that "[e]ven if the court would have come to a different conclusion on the evidence before the Tribunal, this does not mean that the decision is patently unreasonable".

The Court identified the appropriate standard of review of the judicial review decision as correctness and determined the reviewing judge had made several errors.

According to the Court, the judge applied the wrong test under section 27(1)(c) of the Code in suggesting that "the Tribunal did not assess whether, if the evidence and allegations advanced in Mr. Francescutti's case were proven true, his complaint had a reasonable prospect of success".

Under section 27(1)(c), the Tribunal was not required to assess the allegations made and evidence put forward by Mr. Francescutti in the absence of other evidence. The Tribunal is required to assess the whole of the evidence provided by the parties to determine if there is a reasonable prospect the complaint will succeed.  This was precisely what the Tribunal member did.

The reviewing judge also made an error in holding that the Tribunal member incorrectly made findings of fact. The Court held that the Tribunal considered the evidence presented by the parties, none of which established a basis, beyond the realm of conjecture, to support a nexus between Mr. Francescutti's mental health issues and his discharge.  The Tribunal member was entitled to assess the evidence and conclude there was no reasonable possibility that Mr. Francescutti could establish the requisite nexus.  In coming to her conclusion, she did not rely on any of the disputed facts.  Rather, she relied on admitted facts including the fact that Mr. Francescutti took the jacket, lied about his misconduct for approximately a month and only admitting to it when confronted with the video evidence.

As well, the reviewing judge erred in holding that the Tribunal could not weigh credibility at the dismissal stage, and in finding that there were key credibility issues which required a hearing. The Court held that there was no conflict in the medical evidence.  The only conflict was the relevance of Mr. Francescutti's view that his conduct was related to his mental health, and none of the medical evidence supported that contention.  The Court stated:

As noted in Bell, almost every complaint will invoke a credibility question, and the gate-keeping function under s. 27(1)(c) requires an assessment of evidence.  If there are foundational or key issues of credibility, then the matter must go to a hearing.  The reviewing judge here, however, erred in making his own assessment of whether the evidence demonstrated key credibility issues.

Finally, the Court concluded that the reviewing judge did not accord the Tribunal's decision the high degree of deference it deserved. Instead, the judge reweighed the evidence, drew inferences from the evidence, and substituted his view for the Tribunal's.  That was not right.

Previously printed in the LexisNexis Labour Notes Newsletter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Sarah Dickson
Events from this Firm
18 Oct 2018, Seminar, Vancouver, Canada

Recognizing and managing mental health issues in the workplace can be one of the most challenging human resources issues facing employers.

25 Oct 2018, Seminar, Vancouver, Canada

New privacy requirements come into force on November 1, 2018. Organizations that are subject to the federal Personal Information and Protection of Privacy Act will be required to comply with a new mandatory breach reporting regime.

6 Nov 2018, Webinar, Vancouver, Canada

This always-popular webinar is our annual update of some of the key arbitration decisions issued in the previous year.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions