Canada: Arbitration Provision Takes Aim At Competent Authority Deadlock

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Tax, July 2008

Where a taxpayer considers that the assessing actions of one of the Contracting States to the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (the Treaty) will result in double taxation, the taxpayer may present its case to the competent authority of the Contracting State of which the taxpayer is a resident. This triggers a process under which the competent authorities of the two states must endeavour to reach a resolution of the issue that is mutually acceptable to both competent authorities. The basic principles that govern this process are set out in Article XXVI – Mutual Agreement Procedure, commonly known as "MAP," and in Article IX. This provision also governs cases submitted for an Advance Pricing Agreement, which the governments undertake as competent authorities.

Prior to the Fifth Protocol to the Treaty (the Protocol), there has not been any satisfactory mechanism for resolving situations where the competent authorities were unable to reach a mutual agreement under the MAP. The Protocol amends the MAP to introduce mandatory arbitration in order to ensure timely resolution of MAP cases, as was emphasized in the introduction of the Protocol to the Foreign Relations Committee of the U.S. Senate by the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (emphasis added):

"[U]nresolved competent authority proceedings appear to be a multinational occurrence. As a general matter, it is beneficial to resolve tax disputes effectively and efficiently. The new arbitration procedures included in the proposed protocol are intended to ensure that the mutual agreement procedures occur pursuant to a schedule and that all cases are resolved within a limited time period.

We understand that there are a significant number of competent authority cases pending between the U.S. and Canada, and that, historically, a substantial number of double taxation cases have not been satisfactorily resolved by the U.S. and Canadian competent authorities... While many expect that the proposed mandatory and binding arbitration procedures will be successful in resolving recurring issues and will encourage the competent authorities to settle cases without resort to arbitration, it will take time to ascertain if these procedures are effective or if unexpected problems arise."

The form of arbitration introduced by the Protocol is so-called "baseball" or "last best offer" arbitration whereby each of the two competent authorities provides a proposed resolution to an arbitration panel. The arbitration panel is then restricted to choosing between one of the two proposed resolutions. The benefits that the Treaty negotiators hoped to achieve from the last best offer method of arbitration was also addressed in the introductory comment of the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, as follows:

"The last best offer approach is intended to induce the competent authorities to moderate their positions, including before arbitration proceedings would commence, and this to increase the possibility of a negotiated settlement."

Many of the important details with respect to the procedure governing an arbitration proceeding are set out in the exchange of notes attached as Annex A to the Protocol (the Arbitration Note). Paragraph 11 of the Arbitration Note provides that, unless any concerned person (essentially any taxpayer affected by the determination in either Contracting State) does not accept the decision of the arbitration board, the determination of the board constitutes a resolution by mutual agreement under Article XXVI of the Treaty and, consequently, is binding on both Contracting States. Each concerned person must, within 30 days of receiving the determination from the competent authority to which the case was first presented, advise that competent authority whether the person accepts the determination. The failure to advise the competent authority within the requisite time is considered a rejection of the determination.

There are three conditions that must be met before arbitration commences. The first condition is that tax returns have been filed either in the U.S. or Canada with respect to the tax years in issue. The second is that the case is not one that the competent authorities both agree, before the date on which arbitration proceedings would otherwise begin, is not suitable for arbitration. The third is that the taxpayer and all other "concerned persons" whose tax liability would be directly affected by the arbitration, as well as their advisers, agree to keep confidential all information received from the competent authorities and the arbitration board, other than the determination of the board. The latter condition effectively provides the affected taxpayers with a veto over whether arbitration is commenced by the competent authorities.

Where the competent authorities are unable to reach agreement, and subject to the taxpayer providing the requisite promise of confidentiality, arbitration proceedings are to begin two years after the "commencement date" unless the competent authorities have each previously agreed to a different date. For these purposes the "commencement date" is defined as the earliest date on which the competent authorities have both received the information necessary to undertake substantive consideration for a mutual agreement. The Arbitration Note sets out (and the Technical Explanation (TE) echoes) the information required by the competent authorities, including cases that were initially submitted to the competent authorities as a request for an Advance Pricing Agreement, as follows:

"In the case of the U.S., this information is (i) the information that must be submitted to the U.S. competent authority under Section 4.05 of Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B. 1035 (or any applicable successor publication), and (ii) for cases initially submitted as a request for an Advance Pricing Agreement, the information that must be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service under Rev. Proc. 2006-9, 2006-2 I.R.B. 278 (or any applicable successor publication). In the case of Canada, this information is the information required to be submitted to the Canadian competent authority under Information Circular 71-17 (or any applicable successor publication)."

The new arbitration provision is available for cases already under consideration by the competent authorities under the MAP article, as well as new cases arising after the date of the Protocol. The TE clarifies that for such cases, the "commencement date" that starts the two-year clock for the submission of an existing case to arbitration is the date on which the Protocol enters into force. However, by mutual agreement, the competent authorities can waive the two-year wait and move existing cases to arbitration on a faster timeline. In this regard, it is notable that the TE states that "the competent authorities are encouraged to develop and implement procedures for arbitration by January 1, 2009, and begin scheduling arbitration of otherwise unresolvable MAP cases in inventory (and meeting agreed criteria) prior to the two years from entry into force."

In addition to the conditions described above, arbitration is only available in cases that involve the application of those articles of the Treaty that the competent authorities have agreed upon by exchange of notes. In the Arbitration Note, Canada and the U.S. agree that arbitration should apply to the application of the provisions of the Treaty in respect of the residence of an individual, the existence of a permanent establishment, the attribution of business profits to a permanent establishment, transfer-pricing adjustments, and the apportionment of royalties to exempt and taxable amounts, along with other provisions that the competent authorities may agree to in the future. The competent authorities may agree that a particular case is not suitable for arbitration, but must do so before the arbitration proceeding for that case begins. It is expected that transfer-pricing adjustments levied by one of the countries against a taxpayer or a related party will be the most common subject of contentious disputes that result in arbitration.

The Arbitration Note and the TE each provide that the determination reached by an arbitration board shall be limited to a determination regarding the amount of income, expense or tax reportable to the Contracting States. The treatment of any associated interest or penalties shall be determined by applicable domestic law of the Contracting States. Further, although the determination of the arbitration board in a particular case shall be binding on the Contracting States in that case, it shall not state a rationale and shall have no precedential value.

The Arbitration Note provides that that the arbitration board must apply the following authorities in making its determination: (a) the provisions of the Treaty; (b) any agreed commentaries or explanations of Canada and the U.S. concerning the Treaty (presumably including the TE); (c) the laws of the U.S. and Canada to the extent they do not conflict; and (d) relevant OECD Commentary, Guidelines or Reports reporting relevant analogous portions of OECD Model Tax Convention.

The competent authorities are permitted to resolve the case by mutual agreement while it is before the arbitration board and thereby terminate the arbitration proceeding. Indeed, it is likely that the fact the entire position of one of the competent authorities will be rejected in its entirety by the arbitration panel will be a compelling influence on the two governments to come to a negotiated settlement either before arbitration begins or after the submission of proposed resolutions to the board, but before its final determination. In addition, the taxpayer may withdraw the request for competent authority relief under the MAP, which has the effect of terminating the arbitration proceeding.

Each arbitration board will consist of three members, one appointed by each Contracting State within sixty days of the commencement of the arbitration and the third (who serves as chair) appointed by agreement of the other two members. Both Canada and the U.S. agree to develop a non-exclusive list of individuals with familiarity in international tax matters who may potentially serve as the chair of the board. The TE states that it is agreed that the third member ordinarily should not be a citizen of either Canada or the U.S. The Arbitration Note provides that if the third member is not agreed to within a further 60 days, a Contracting State shall ask the highest ranking member of the Secretariat at the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration of the OECD who is not a citizen of either Contracting State, to appoint the chair.

Once the chair of the arbitration board is in place, each Contracting State has 60 days to submit its position in writing and a further 60 days to submit a written response to the position of the other Contracting State. If a state fails to make an initial submission within the deadline, the position of the other state is taken as binding. The arbitration board is granted the authority to adopt any procedures necessary for the conduct of its business, provided that the procedures are not inconsistent with the MAP set out in the Treaty or the exchange of notes. The arbitration board must deliver its determination in writing within six months of the appointment of its chair.

The strict timelines established by, and the initial procedural matters agreed upon in, the Arbitration Note accompanying the Protocol are an encouraging first step in the establishment of a system for the efficient resolution of contentious issues involving Canadian taxpayers and related parties in the U.S. However, in practice, there may be numerous taxpayers with disputes that have already been subject to the MAP process for well in excess of the two years required for arbitration to commence. It will be equally critical that Canada and the U.S. swiftly devote sufficient resources to the process, move to identify potential arbitrators and develop any requisite additional procedural rules in order to ensure that arbitration in fact operates as a viable alternative for resolving disputes in a timely manner.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.