Canada: Distinguishing Between A Tax And A Regulatory Charge And The Return Of Improperly Collected Money

Last Updated: July 16 2008
Article by Barbara A. McIsaac, Benjamin Mills and David M. Porter

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2018

Section 53 of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides that "Bills for appropriating any Part of the Public Revenue, or for imposing any Tax or Impost, shall originate in the House of Commons."

This provision gives effect to a central principle of parliamentary democracies that taxation cannot occur without representation and, thus, that any measure imposing a tax must originate in the legislature. Taxation powers, therefore, cannot arise incidentally in regulations or other delegated legislation.

As a result, where legislation provides that a minister or an agency is permitted to collect "fees" by way of regulation (which will prescribe the amount to be paid and the terms of payment), that minister or agency cannot misuse the power to levy fees to levy what is in fact and in law a tax.

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has incrementally developed jurisprudence that seeks to answer two questions that flow from Section 53 and the potential misuse of the power to levy fees.

The first question is: when is a levy a tax as opposed to some other regulatory charge?

That question has been answered by the SCC's decision in 620 Connaught Ltd v. Canada (Attorney General) 2008 SCC 7 (620), which sets out an analytical framework to distinguish a tax from a regulatory charge.

The second question is: what happens to the amounts collected, if the levy is a tax that did not originate in the legislature? That question has been answered in Kingstreet Investment Ltd. v. New Brunswick [2007] 1 S.C.R. 3 (Kingstreet), which provides that, subject to limitation periods and remedial legislation, the Crown is required to return the money to the person from whom it was improperly collected.

620 — When is a Levy a Tax?

In 620, the SCC articulated a clear analytical framework to determine whether a levy is a tax as opposed to a regulatory charge. The purpose of the analysis is to distil the levy to its dominant or most important characteristics (as opposed to its incidental features), and to identify its primary purpose. The analysis follows a two-stage process whereby a court first considers whether the levy has the attributes of a tax and then considers whether the levy is connected to a regulatory scheme.

Stage I — Does the levy have the characteristics of a tax?

The first step in the analysis is to determine whether the levy has the characteristics of a tax by considering whether it is:

  1. enforceable by law — this element will be met when there is a legal requirement to pay or practical compulsion in the sense that failing to pay would result in the withholding of some license or authorization issued by the government to engage in some activity or business or some other penalty;

  2. imposed under the authority of the legislature — this element will be met when the charge purports to be imposed pursuant to the authority of some legislation;

  3. levied by a public body — the levy cannot originate from a private entity; and

  4. intended for a public purpose — this requirement will be met when the purpose of the levy is to collect funds for some public purpose.

As noted by the SCC in 620, these characteristics will likely apply to most government levies. It is therefore necessary to ask whether each of these elements are the dominant characteristics of the levy or whether they are only incidental. If they are only incidental, then the levy will not be considered a tax. Also, it is important to keep in mind that these factors were first articulated by the SCC in 1931 in Lawson v. Interior Tree Fruit and Vegetable Committee of Direction [1931] S.C.R.357 at a time when government regulation and the accompanying fees were not as pervasive as they are now.

Assuming that these requirements are met, a court will then turn its mind to the second part of the analysis and consider whether the levy is connected to a regulatory scheme.

Stage II — Is the levy connected to a regulatory scheme?

The second element of the analysis was developed more recently by the SCC in Eurig Estates (Re) [1998] 2 S.C.R. 565 and Westbank First Nation v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority [1999] 3 S.C.R. 134. This element requires the court to consider whether the levy is "unconnected to any form of a regulatory scheme" or is "necessarily incidental to a broader regulatory scheme." When the levy is not connected to any regulatory scheme, it will be a tax. When the levy is connected to some regulatory scheme in some necessary manner, it will be a regulatory charge.

To determine whether the levy is connected to a regulatory scheme, a court should look for the presence of some or all of the following indicia:

  1. a complete, complex and detailed code of regulation;

  2. a regulatory purpose that seeks to effect certain behaviour;

  3. the presence of actual or properly estimated costs of the regulation; and

  4. a relationship between the person being regulated and the regulation, where the person being regulated either benefits from, or causes the need for, the regulation.

As noted by the SCC in 620, the first three considerations establish the existence of the regulatory scheme while the fourth consideration establishes that the regulatory scheme is relevant or connected to the person being regulated. A relationship between the scheme and the person being regulated will exist when the revenues collected via the levy are tied to the costs of the regulatory scheme (i.e., there is some reasonable nexus between the funds collected by the levy and the costs of funding the regulatory scheme), or where the levy itself has a regulatory purpose (i.e., encouraging or discouraging certain behaviour).

The fourth consideration has the most room for the application of judicial discretion as it requires a court to consider the sufficiency of the relationship between the regulatory scheme and the person paying the levy, and whether that relationship is direct or indirect. The resulting concern for those seeking to challenge the imposition of a levy on the basis that it is an unconstitutional tax for want of authorization from the legislature is that a court will broadly define the regulatory scheme and will not strictly apply the requirement for a direct connection between the person being regulated and the regulatory scheme.

However, in 620, the SCC has made it clear that the relationship between the scheme and the person paying the levy must be sufficient and direct. In its decision in 620, the SCC adopted the reasons of the Federal Court of Appeal, which held that the regulatory scheme was sufficiently and directly related to the person paying the levy as the amounts collected were applied in a manner that brought a direct benefit to the person's business. In 620, restaurant and bar owners were required to pay a levy on the alcoholic beverages they sold in Jasper National Park. The amounts collected were used to fund the operation of Jasper National Park where the alcoholic beverages were sold. Therefore, the amounts were applied in a manner that would increase the person's potential customer base (i.e., there was a direct benefit). What is particularly important is that the Federal Court of Appeal stated, and the SCC agreed, that the person would only receive an indirect benefit if the amounts collected went to funding the national park system generally or to funding the central administration of national parks, thereby reinforcing the need for a direct connection.

Taxes and regulatory charges distinguished from user fees and proprietary charges

In 620, the SCC distinguished between a tax, as defined above (and which must originate in the legislature) and a regulatory charge, a user fee and a proprietary charge.

The SCC defined a "regulatory charge" as a levy imposed in relation to rights or privileges awarded or granted by the Crown. The funds collected under the regulatory scheme to which the levy relates are used to finance the scheme or to alter individual behaviour.

In contrast, the SCC defined a "user fee" as a fee charged by the Crown for use of government services or facilities. In order for a levy to be a "user fee" a clear connection must exist between the quantum charged and the cost to government in providing the services or facilities such that the user fee charged does not exceed the cost to government of providing the service or facilities.

Also in 620, the SCC identified "proprietary charges" as a fourth category of levies. A "proprietary charge" is a levy charged for goods or services supplied by the Crown in a commercial context. Citing commentators, the SCC identified charges such as royalties or rents for the exploitation of provincially owned natural resources as examples of proprietary charges.

Kingstreet — What Happens to the Amounts Collected?

If a court concludes that the levy is a tax as opposed to a regulatory charge and also concludes that the tax was not enacted by the legislature in accordance with the Section 53 of the Constitution Act, 1867, the issue then becomes what to do about the amounts improperly collected.

In Kingstreet, the SCC simply held that the amounts collected are to be returned to the person from whom they were collected.

In a unanimous decision, the SCC forcefully held that illegally collected taxes must be returned to the person who paid them, subject to limitation periods and remedial legislation. The SCC held that to permit the Crown to retain an ultra vires tax would be to condone a breach of the rule of law. By adopting a rule that grants a constitutional right to recover illegally collected taxes, the SCC expressly rejected earlier jurisprudence that appeared to immunize public authorities from restitutionary claims with respect to monies collected under invalid legislation. This is an important finding as the result of a challenge to an illegally imposed tax is not simply relief against future payments but can result in the return of amounts paid.

McCarthy Tétrault Notes:

Individual businesses operating in Canada, and industry associations, should closely scrutinize any levies that they, or their members, are paying to public authorities — and should consider whether those levies can be properly characterized as a tax. If a levy can be characterized as a tax, businesses or industry associations should determine whether that levy has been properly authorized by the legislature.

Examples of instances where "fees" have been later determined to be taxes include "fees" related to the purchase of fuel in British Columbia, having a will probated in Ontario and the sale of alcohol in New Brunswick.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions