Canada: Court of Appeal Clarifies Alberta Limitations Law

Copyright 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation, July 2008

In its recent and important decision in Bowes v. Edmonton, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered the ultimate 10-year limitation period set out in subsection 3(1)(b) of the Alberta Limitations Act R.S.A. 2000 c. L-12 (the Act). Subsection 3(1)(b) of the Act provides:

3(1) (b) Subject to section 11, if a claimant does not seek a remedial order within 10 years after the claim arose...the defendant, on pleading this Act as a defence, is entitled to immunity from liability in respect of the claim."

Section 3(3) explains when a claim arises for the purpose of subsection 3(1)(b). It states:

3(3) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b),

  1. a claim or any number of claims based on any number of breaches of duty, resulting from a continuing course of conduct or a series of related acts or omissions, arises when the conduct terminates or the last act or omission occurs;

  2. a claim based on a breach of a duty arises when the conduct, act or omission occurs;

  3. a claim based on a demand obligation arises when a default in performance occurs after a demand for performance is made;

  4. a claim in respect of a proceeding under the Fatal Accidents Act arises when the conduct that causes the death, on which the claim is based, occurs;

  5. a claim for contribution arises when the claimant for contribution is made a defendant in respect of, or incurs a liability through the settlement of, a claim seeking to impose a liability on which the claim for contribution can be based, whichever first occurs;

  6. a claim for a remedial order for the recovery of possession of real property arises when the claimant is dispossessed of the real property.

The "new" Alberta Limitations Act was brought into force in Alberta in 1999. The Act sought to remedy the problems associated with "discoverability" and "pigeon-holing" that had existed under historical limitations acts and under the common law, and prescribe a new approach that attempts to balance the interests of fairness as between plaintiffs and defendants. To this end, the Act prescribes two different limitation periods.

The first limitation period codifies the approach taken in modern case law and allows the plaintiff two years to sue from the time that they discover, or should have discovered, the elements allowing him or her to sue. The second limitation period, which period is discussed herein, is longer than the first and provides for a "drop dead" date, after which the plaintiff cannot sue. In the Act, this period is 10 years from the date the claim arose. Thus, the Act attempts to balance the interests of both plaintiffs and defendants. The first limitation period provides that plaintiffs should have an opportunity to "discover" the wrong before being denied the opportunity to sue. The second limitation period, on the other hand, protects defendants from undiscovered causes of action which are discovered far into the future. The two provisions together form a compromise that has been enacted by the legislature in an attempt to further the interests of justice and of society more broadly.

Bowes v. Edmonton considered a negligence claim that had been brought by the plaintiffs, who owned and lived in three adjoining homes in an expensive Edmonton neighbourhood. About 12 years after the homes were built, a section of the riverbank next to the homes quickly collapsed and slid into the deep valley adjoining the homes. The collapse ruined one of the homes, and rendered the other two very dangerous and unsalvageable. The trial Reasons for Judgment found liability, but dismissed the suit as brought after the limitation period expired. On appeal, the finding of liability was overturned, but the conclusion of the trial judge regarding the application of subsection 3(1)(b) of the Act, the section creating the ultimate 10-year limitation period, was upheld and the case was dismissed.

The Court of Appeal's discussion regarding the strict application of this provision is of significant import, as there had previously been some view that the seeming harshness of the result would be ameliorated by judicial activism. This decision establishes that such activism is not to occur.

In his Reasons for Judgment, Mr. Justice Côté acknowledged the policy dilemma which is created by the ultimate 10-year limitation period. In the instant case, the plaintiffs' time to sue expired before they knew that they had a claim, and indeed perhaps even before they had a claim which the law would act upon. From the plaintiff's perspective, Justice Côté acknowledged, the rule is unjust. He stated, the legislation "is enacted to prevent certain plaintiffs from suing on good causes of action". However, he went on to enumerate and discuss a number of policy considerations behind the imposition of the ultimate 10-year limitation period which ameliorate the apparent unjust application of the rule.

First, there is the fact that in order for commerce to function as it does, people and businesses need to be able to move forward. They must be able to plan their affairs without keeping huge reserves against the possibility of old claims arising. The social cost of any other proposition would be too high.

Second, the interests of justice are not served by allowing actions to be brought decades after the wrong has been done. To try and find and test evidence about events decades old is, in the words of the court, "usually roulette, not a serious exploration of the truth."

Third, in liability claims, the defendant is to be held to the standards and methods followed in their respective profession or industry at the time the alleged wrong took place. Both sides will have to call evidence on that topic, and such evidence is difficult to come by years after the fact as those with expertise at the time of the alleged wrong may no longer be practising in that profession.

Finally, the court noted that the ultimate 10-year limitation period was included in the Limitations Act to alleviate the problems associated with legal issues surrounding "discoverability" which existed under the previous law. The application of the rule of discoverability created problems for both defendants and plaintiffs. Plaintiffs did not know when they had to sue or had lost their right to do so, while potential defendants were never safe from the potential of an "undiscoverable" claim arising.

The court noted that all of the above stated policy considerations form the background for the Act, which was put into place to reform the previous state of the law after much research and consideration, including several reports issued by the Institute of Law Research and Reform. These policy considerations are key to the interpretation of the Act which is to be interpreted in its entire context and harmoniously with the scheme and object of the Act. The object of the Act is informed by the application of the Heydon method, which requires the court to consider the mischief in the old law which the new legislation was aimed at. This mischief is reflected in the policy considerations noted above and was also discussed in the Alberta Law Reform Institute report, Limitations, Report No. 55 (Edmonton: December 1989).

Justice Côté noted that, rather than rely upon the common law position regarding a "cause of action", subsection 3(1)(b) has its own express interpretation section at subsection 3(3)(b) which provides that for the purposes of the ultimate 10-year limitation period, the time under the absolute period starts to run from the negligent or wrongful act or omission itself. There is no need to wait for the harm itself to occur. Thus, in the instant case while the slide did not take place until 1999, the allegedly negligent act occurred when the development permit was issued to the homeowners in the 1980s.

Finally, the Alberta Court of appeal noted that "The Legislature is sovereign on this topic, and in my view, it has spoken deliberately and clearly in this area. We cannot amend the Act, nor can we ignore its history or its scheme." This decision seems to support the position that judicial activism is not likely to displace the ultimate 10-year limitation period established by the Act.

In summary, this decision means that Alberta courts will strictly apply the ultimate 10-year limitation period established by the Act as the doctrine of res judicata will make this clear pronouncement of the law difficult to distinguish. While such an application may seem to create an unfair result for plaintiffs such as those in Bowes – since the Act does "prevent certain plaintiffs from suing on good causes of action" – the policy considerations behind the Act reveal that such a strict application of the provision serves justice more broadly. This decision is important for all facets of society, because it creates certainty for both plaintiffs and defendants and eliminates the spectre of costly claims arising far into the future.

The decision, practically, is likely to have the most significant effect on businesses or individuals involved in work with potential "long-tail" consequence, such as those involved in construction or manufacturing. Regardless of when the wrong was discovered, the plaintiff has only 10 years to bring action.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions