Canada: Ont. Super. Ct. Summarily Dismisses Slip And Fall Claim Because No Objective Evidence Of An Unsafe Condition And No Breach Of Maintenance Obligations

Last Updated: October 16 2017
Article by Michael S. Teitelbaum

Posted in Occupiers' Liability In Hamilton v. Ontario Corporation #2000533 o/a Toronto Community Housing Corporation, Ontario Superior Court Justice Sanfilippo summarily dismissed this occupiers' liability action in which the then 67-year old plaintiff tenant alleges she slipped and fell on the vinyl floor in the corridor outside her apartment on the fourth floor of her building. She had been living in the building for nine years.

His Honour held that "[i]n the absence of any objective evidence of any unsafe condition, and after assessment of the housekeeping protocols in place by the TCHC for the upkeep of the Building in general and the corridor specifically, there is no basis on which to find any breach of duty of care by the TCHC that could be found to have caused Mrs. Hamilton's slip and fall".

His Honour reviewed summary judgment law at paras. 12-16, and occupiers' liability law at paras. 30-33. In respect of the latter, he noted  that in order "[t]o succeed in a claim against an occupier for injury sustained in a slip and fall, the plaintiff must 'pinpoint some act or failure on the part of the occupier that caused the plaintiff's injury'".

His Honour stated in part:

[22] In the Notice Letter, Mrs. Hamilton stated that she "suddenly slipped on the vinyl floor in the corridor which was quite shiny and slippery."

[23] In the Hamilton Affidavit, Mrs. Hamilton testified to her subjectively-held belief that the floor was slippery but without any reference to visual observation of the floor being shiny. She states as follows:

When I slipped, I slipped on something and went up in the air and fell on my right arm. I slipped with one foot. I recall there being dirt on my clothes from the flooring when I fell. ... I do not recall what I slipped on but I do recall it being slippery.

[24] In her discovery testimony, Mrs. Hamilton provided no evidence of any observation of any hazard on the corridor floor and no mention of observing anything "shiny". The plaintiff testified to her belief that she "slid on something". The Notice Letter was not referenced. Pertinent extracts from the examination evidence are as follows: 

Q. 127: What did you fall on?

A. I'm honestly not sure.
...
Q. 135: You said that you slipped on something, and you didn't know what it was, you said?

A. I don't. No.
...
Q. 240. Again, you didn't notice anything unusual when you were walking --...

A. No.
...
Q. 245. You didn't see any water or any spills at that time?

A. I can't recall.

Q. 246. Is it flat, the hallway?

A. Yes, it's flat.

Q. 247. Any other observations of the hallway when you fell?

A. No, not at the time. I can't recall.

Q. 248. What do you think caused your fall?

A. I'm not sure. ... There had to be something on the floor that I did not see. I can't recall.
...

Q. 253-255: You said that you – can you tell me how you fell?

A. I was just walking down with my keys in my hand ... And maybe one letter in the same hand. And I'm walking down, and all of a sudden, my feet just went up like that. I just went up in the air and just – fell. I slid on something. I don't know what it was. ...

[25] Mrs. Hamilton testified that the lighting of the corridor presented no problem in sight lines (Q. 140-141), she has no recollection of feeling any wetness, or indeed anything, on the floor (Q. 135-137) and she does not recall the weather that day (Q. 238). No one witnessed her fall (Q. 239, 283). Her son, who attended to her after her fall, did not detect anything on the floor (Q. 282).

[26] The plaintiff's evidence at its highest is that she detected some dirt on her clothing as she rested on the floor after her fall (Q. 259-262). There is no description of the amount or location of the dirt or, indeed, any evidence on which to determine on a balance of probabilities that the dirt had any role in the incident.

[27] Mrs. Hamilton testified to her history of complaints, made over the term of her tenancy, of general lack of cleanliness and upkeep of the Building. She called the maintenance office and forwarded letters, which were testified to but not placed in evidence. These complaints show Mrs. Hamilton's subjectively-held belief of the Building's lack of cleanliness and upkeep. She also produced photographs, taken after the incident, of spills in the corridor. However, she did not connect these conditions with the conditions of the corridor on May 7, 2012. 

[28] Mrs. Hamilton's testimony did not connect any of her maintenance complaints to the day of the incident or even the days leading to May 7, 2012. Mrs. Hamilton's subjectively-held belief is that there had to be something on the floor, undetected by her before or after her fall, which caused her to slip and fall, but she is unable to identify any hazard or unsafe condition that day.

[29] The plaintiff is obligated to put her "best foot forward", to "lead with trump" in tendering evidence of a condition that caused the premises not to be reasonably safe. The evidence, taken in its totality, shows that there is no genuine issue for trial on the issue of proof of an unsafe condition in the vinyl-floored corridor outside of Mrs. Hamilton's apartment on May 7, 2012. Mrs. Hamilton is not able to identify any unsafe condition that is alleged to have caused her to slip and fall.
...

[44] Having considered the plaintiff's submissions, including the case law relied upon by the plaintiff, I do not accept that the inference sought by the plaintiff can be drawn in the facts of this case. An inference of causation must be based on objective facts, not subjective rationalization.

[45] By way of example, in Musselman v. 875667 Ontario Inc., 2010 ONSC 3177, 93 C.L.R. (3d) 58 (Ont. S.C.J.), the plaintiff's fall down a staircase was not witnessed by anyone. The objective evidence established that the staircase was in an "overall unsafe condition" and was "overall grossly incompliant" with the applicable building codes and by-laws. On the basis of evidence of the generally unsafe condition of the staircase, the court drew an inference that the generally unsafe staircase caused the fall.

[46] Reference was made in Musselman to Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, wherein the inference of causation was similarly determined based on objective evidence. In doing so, the court stated that an inference cannot be based on conjecture or speculation, citing Caswell v. Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd. (1939), [1940] A.C. 152 (U.K. H.L.), at p. 169: "Inference must be carefully distinguished from conjecture or speculation. There can be no inference unless there are objective facts from which to infer the other facts which it has sought to establish."

[47] In Kamin v. Kawartha Dairy Ltd. (2006), 79 O.R. (3d) 284 (Ont. C.A.) [Kamin], the plaintiff sustained personal injury when she tripped in a parking lot that was found to be unreasonably unsafe, resulting in a determination that the occupier failed to meet the standards required by section 3(1) of the Occupier's Liability Act, but nonetheless failed in her action as the plaintiff could not identify the precise location of the fall. This determination was reversed on appeal on the basis that too high an onus had been set on the issue of causation, which need not be determined by "scientific precision", and that the facts of the case supported an inference that the trip and fall must have resulted from a breach of duty by the occupier. The Court of Appeal stated as follows, at para. 8:

 Had the trial judge not erred in her causation analysis by setting too high an onus for the appellant to meet, there was ample evidence on which to find that the appellant's injuries were caused, or materially contributed to, by the respondent's negligence. This is particularly so given that there was no evidence of any other possible reason for her to have fallen. In my view, the trial judge erred in failing to find, or to draw the only reasonable inference, that on all the evidence the respondent's negligence caused or materially contributed to the appellant's fall and her resulting injuries.

[48] This action advanced on behalf of Mrs. Hamilton does not have the factual elements present in Kamin, where there was considerable, uncontradicted objective evidence that the entire parking lot in which the trip occurred was in very poor, unsafe condition, uneven, chipped and in need of resurfacing. There is no objective evidence here of an unsafe condition in the corridor at or even proximate to where the plaintiff slipped and fell, or indeed otherwise on the floor or in the Building generally. This case does not have an evidentiary basis on which to find a breach of duty of care by the TCHC to which a causation analysis of the nature set out in Kamin could be applied.

[49] This case bears more similarity to Nandlal v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2014 ONSC 4760, CarswellOnt 11129, aff'd 2015 ONCA 166, 2015 CarswellOnt 3228, where the plaintiff slipped and fell at the threshold of a flight of stairs at a TTC station. The plaintiff did not see any debris or hazard on the tile stair at the location of her fall, but had noticed debris in the station on prior occasions and elsewhere on the station on the day in question. There was no evidence of defect in the location where the plaintiff fell. The Court of Appeal dismissed the argument that the lower court judge had erred in refusing to draw an inference based on the evidence before him that the top of the staircase where Mrs. Nandlal fell was in a state of non-repair. The distinguishing element from Kamin was the lack of objective evidence of unsafe and generally unmaintained conditions in or about the area of the fall. 

[50] The plaintiff's lack of any objective evidence to pinpoint an unsafe condition at the incident site, or even in the fourth-floor corridor, leads to the determination that this case cannot succeed. The plaintiff's evidence at its highest is that the floor was slippery, but there is no objective evidence of anything that might have caused the floor to have been slippery or unsafe that day.

G. Conclusion

[51] I have determined that there is no genuine issue requiring trial on the issue of liability. It is fair and just to determine the liability issue in this action summarily pursuant to Rule 20.

[52] The plaintiff subjectively believes that her slip and fall was caused by a slippery vinyl floor in the corridor outside her apartment but, by reason of the absence of any objective evidence, the plaintiff has failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that an unsafe condition existed on May 7, 2012. There is no objective evidence of anything that could have caused the floor to be slippery. Even broadly, there is no evidence of a general lack of maintenance in the fourth-floor corridor that day that could give rise to an objective determination of an unsafe condition to which Mrs. Hamilton's slip and fall could be connected causally or by reasonable inference.

[53] There is a subjective belief by Mrs. Hamilton that her slip and fall must have been caused by something and that lack of maintenance must be the cause. That Mrs. Hamilton had issues with the maintenance of the Building by the TCHC in the past, or detected spills in the corridor at times after the incident, does not reasonably allow for an inference to be drawn that Mrs. Hamilton's injury was caused by an unsafe condition on May 7, 2012.

[54] In the absence of any objective evidence of any unsafe condition, and after assessment of the housekeeping protocols in place by the TCHC for the upkeep of the Building in general and the corridor specifically, there is no basis on which to find any breach of duty of care by the TCHC that could be found to have caused Mrs. Hamilton's slip and fall.

[55] Summary judgment is granted dismissing the plaintiff's claim.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions