Securities class action filings have hit record highs in the United States. In 2016, the United States observed the highest number of securities class action filings since "the early 2000s dot-com crash."[1] By July of this year, 246 new securities class actions claims were filed in U.S. federal courts.[2] This phenomenon comes as little surprise; these numbers reflect the recent upward trend in securities class action claims observed over the past number of years in the United States.
Canada, on the other hand, is not yet experiencing the same trend. In 2016, nine new securities class action claims were filed. With the exception of 2015, this figure is lower than the number of claims filed in any year annually since 2010.[3] These lower numbers of claims may be explained by differences in the litigation climate or incentive structures for plaintiff's counsel. What is clear is that companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) tend to face less litigation risk. From 2011 to 2016, 44 securities class actions were filed against companies listed on the TSX. This translates to a litigation risk of about 0.5% per year.[4] In comparison, companies listed on the major securities exchanges in the United States faced a litigation risk of approximately 3.1% per year over the same period.[5]
Canadian dual-listed companies, however, face increased risk. Six out of the nine class actions filed in Canada in 2016 involved companies that were also sued in parallel in the United States.[6] In fact, since 2006, approximately half of all securities class actions launched in the United States against Canadian companies have a corresponding claim in Canada.[7]
This data appears to suggest that Canadian companies listed both on Canadian and American securities exchanges are at a higher risk of securities class action lawsuits than companies listed solely on the TSX.
The author would like to thank Fahad Diwan, Student-At-Law, for his contribution to this article.
[1] Bradley A.
Heys & Robert Patton, "Trends in Canadian Securities Class
Actions: 2016 update" (2016) NERA Economic Consulting Report
at 1.
[2] Stefan
Boettrich & Svetlana Starykh, "Securities Class Actions:
2016 Full-Year Review and Mid-2017 Flash Update" (24 July
2017), Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and
Financial Regulation, online:
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/07/24/securities-class-actions-2016-full-year-review-and-mid-2017-flash-update/.
[3] Supra
note 1 at 2.
[4] Ibid.
[5]
Ibid.
[6]
Ibid at 6.
[7] Ibid
at 7.
About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world's preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.
Law around the world
nortonrosefulbright.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.