Canada: Giving Legal Effect To Emails – Can Emails Satisfy The Requirements To Extend Limitation Periods Under The Limitations Act?

Last Updated: August 21 2017
Article by David Gerecke and Julian Nahachewsky (Articling Student)

E-mail conversations are often relatively informal and the participants, especially when they are not lawyers, can take prior discussions as a "given" rather than fully and expressly repeating them to ensure they have legal effect.

Recently, in I.D.H. Diamonds NV v Embee Diamond Technologies Inc., 2017 SKQB 79, the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench considered the legal effect of such informal e-mail discussions and whether they could be relied upon to be an acknowledgment of a debt so as to extend a limitations period under Saskatchewan's The Limitations Act (the "Act").

Mr. Justice Layh held that debt may be considered to have been acknowledged even if not expressly referenced. In addition, emails can satisfy the formal requirements that such acknowledgments be in writing and signed.

Factual Background

In February 2011, Embee Diamond Technologies Inc. ("Embee") purchased 352.73 carats of raw diamonds from I.D.H. Diamonds NV ("IDH"). A deposit was to be paid on delivery of the diamonds with the balance due and payable within 30 days of delivery. The initial deposit was paid in March 2011 and another small payment made a year later but since 2012 Embee had made no further payments. After approximately three years of discussion and e-mail correspondence, it became evident that Embee could not repay the sum it owed to IDH.

During the course of the three years, the e-mails sent by Mike Botha of Embee generally took the form of an update on Embee's efforts to obtain financing. In various emails, Embee would make statements such as "I am doing whatever I can to pay you as soon as possible" or "your money will be transferred the moment it is available" or "Financing is still underway ...". Some emails referenced paying "the amount owing to IDH" and some did not. Some emails were in response to inquiries from IDH about when it would be paid. Generally, references would be to "the funds" or "the money", without any specific reference to the amount of the debt or source of the obligation. There appear to have been at least two dozen emails exchanged along those lines during the three years.

On September 11, 2015, IDH sued Embee to recover the money it was owed. Embee argued that IDH's claim was statute barred by the two year limitations period set out in the Act.

The court was faced with two main issues: 1) whether the debt had to be expressly mentioned in a communication for it to be an acknowledgment of the debt, and 2) whether the emails satisfied the requirements of the Act of being "signed" and "in writing".

The Limitations Act Provisions

The relevant portions of section 11 of the Act state the following:

11(1) If a person acknowledges the existence of a claim for payment of a debt ... the act or omission on which the claim is based is deemed to have taken place on the day on which the acknowledgment was made.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an acknowledgment:

  1. subject to subsections (3), (7) and (8), must be in writing and must be signed by the person making it or the person's agent; and
  2. must be made, before the expiry of the limitation period applicable to the claim, to the claimant ... .

The Circumstances Count

The first requirement under s.11 is that there be an acknowledgment of the debt owed. Embee argued that the e-mails were not an acknowledgment of debt as no e-mail had mentioned the exact amount owing within a two year period. Justice Layh rejected that, taking a much more pragmatic approach that took the broader circumstances into account:

[30] The above series of e-mails satisfies me that Mike Botha repeatedly acknowledged the existence of a debt. As advised by Maher D.C.J. in Gilroy, I have looked to the circumstances in which the e-mails were exchanged and have construed Mr. Botha's e-mails in the way he intended I.D.H. to construe them. Mr. Botha never intimated anything but an ongoing debt obligation. He often reassured I.D.H. that payment was imminent. He offered different arrangements to see if Embee's obligations might be satisfied. I see no need for Embee to have acknowledged a specific quantum of debt ...

Thus, the Court concluded that, through the ongoing e-mail discussions wherein it was clear what debt or commitment or obligations were being referred to, the nature of the emails suggested a continual acknowledgement of the existence of a debt owed by Embee to IDH.

Given that reasoning, it appears that Saskatchewan's courts can be expected to take a practical approach to the evaluation of broader context in determining whether debts have been acknowledged under section 11 of the Act. The types of email exchanges that occurred in this case are now the norm, rather than the exception, for how business parties communicate with one another about these sorts of issues.

The Formal Requirements: "in writing" and "signed"

Section 11 of the Act also requires that an acknowledgment of debt be "in writing" and "signed."

The "in writing" requirement was easily satisfied because The Electronic Information and Documents Act, 2000 (Saskatchewan) ("EIDA") provides as follows in section 8:

8 A requirement pursuant to any law that any information or document be in writing is satisfied if the information or document:

  1. is in an electronic form; andli is accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference.

Justice Layh held that the e-mails were both in electronic form and accessible as to be usable for subsequent reference and thus met the "in writing" requirement of the Act.

With respect to "signed" requirement, the emails sent before mid-2015 contained two things to identify the sender. First, there was the normal name, title and address information that is included at the foot of emails sent by many business people, as follows:

Second, immediately below that address the emails consistently included the following (which essentially would be logo images for Embee):

Embee argued that it had adopted formal electronic signatures for its officers, such as the following (which was not used in an email with IDH before 2015, by which point the limitation period would have expired if the "signatures" depicted above would not be considered to have met the Act's formal requirements):

Thus, the core issue was whether a name and address "box" combined with a logo, as used in everyday emails, would meet the "signed" requirement. Section 14(1) of EIDA states the following about electronic signatures:

14(1) A requirement pursuant to any law for the signature of a person is satisfied by an electronic signature

EIDA defines "electronic signature" as "information in electronic form that a person has created or adopted in order to sign a document and that is in, attached to or associated with the document".

In evaluating whether an ordinary email between two parties would be considered to be "signed", Justice Layh looked to the purpose of the requirements for signatures, being identification of the person who was sending the document (identifying the source and authenticity) and establishing the sender's approval of the document's contents. After review of some case law, he concluded that even absent specific legislation concerning electronic signatures, courts have treated electronic signatures as valid under longstanding common law principles, similar to other modifications such as crosses, initials and rubber stamps.

Justice Layh outlined four requirements that were satisfied by the emails sent by Embee:

  • the presence of some type of "information" on the emails;
  • that information may be in electronic form;
  • the information must have been "created or adopted by the person in order to sign a document"; and
  • the information must be "attached to or associated with the document."

The Court held that Embee's emails to IDH satisfied those conditions and left no doubt as to their authorship or authenticity. In particular, the Court pointed to the consistent presence of the normal name, title and address information and the "logo" image with the diamond images and the "Sirius Star" words.

Embee's use of more formal digital signatures on two other documents (one letter in 2012 and one email in 2015) did not persuade the Court in any way that the lack of formality on the everyday emails established a lack of authenticity or intention to disavow the contents of those emails. Rather, the Court stated:

[63] ... I find the series of emails bear several items of information and indicia to establish that the contents were created or adopted by Mike Botha. Several distinguishing features of the emails, including a registered trademark and the repeated designs and phrases are proof of their authorship. Nor has Embee suggested that it did not author any of the emails.

As a result, the emails were held to be "signed" and "in writing", and to have created a continual acknowledgement of the existence of the debt.


  • This is a highly practical and pragmatic decision as it demonstrates how the courts are adapting and interpreting historic legislation in a manner that accommodates and realizes technological advancements in a meaningful way. Since the court upheld IDH's position, they indicated that "signed" and "in writing" can be satisfied even with an informal e-mail "signature" that may consist of little more than the sender's name and address information. Obviously, the more information that is present to satisfy a court as to the authenticity, the better.
  • This case also illustrates how the courts allow businesses to adapt to modern realities, without sacrificing their legal rights. Courts will now consider the broader context of the correspondence between parties when trying to determine whether an acknowledgment of debt has been made. This contextual analysis adds another layer of protection for parties as the court will take a look at the "big picture" and how it relates to the evidence brought forth at trial for an acknowledgment of debt.


We have learnt that this decision is under appeal and the appeal is set to be heard in mid-September. We will keep you apprised of any developments as they become available.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David Gerecke
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions